Misael Caloz, Sébastien Tran, Max Gau, Edouard Romano, Nikolaos Koutsouvelis, Pelagia G. Tsoutsou
{"title":"从多靶点、单中心、脑立体定向放射外科治疗的患者分段内运动推导边缘。","authors":"Misael Caloz, Sébastien Tran, Max Gau, Edouard Romano, Nikolaos Koutsouvelis, Pelagia G. Tsoutsou","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy and remain a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used and is frequently delivered by hypo-fractionnated volumetric modulated arc therapy using non-coplanar beams, where geometric accuracy and planning margins are a major concern.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>To give a practical analysis of intrafraction patient motion for multi-target, single isocentre, brain SRS treatments and to derive adapted GTV-to-PTV margins.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Data of 154 lesions, spread over 85 fractions from 56 patients treated in our institution with the Varian HyperArc SRS solution was processed. Intrafraction patient motion were recorded using an Optical Surface Monitoring System during irradiation. The present study focuses on small tumor volumes, roughly equal or inferior to 1.5 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msup>\n <mi>cm</mi>\n <mn>3</mn>\n </msup>\n <annotation>${\\rm cm}^3$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>, and frameless mask-based immobilization. For each treatment session, a tumor displacement vector matrix was calculated from the patient drifts as a function of time. Data were combined together into a representative treatment scenario and the dosimetric impact of GTV displacement was calculated.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Recommended margins due to patient motion range between 0.3 and 1 mm, depending on the distance tumor-isocentre, and the desired GTV edge dose coverage. Those values should be added quadratically with other sources of uncertainty, such as mechanical isocentre and kV-MV misalignment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Thorough analysis of intrafraction patient motion was performed, the dosimetric impact was calculated for different scenarios, and adequate GTV-to-PTV margins were derived. These values vary according to the distance isocentre-to-GTV, as well as the desired dose coverage, and should be chosen adequately.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Margin derivation from intrafraction patient motion of multi-target, single isocentre, brain stereotactic radiosurgery treatments\",\"authors\":\"Misael Caloz, Sébastien Tran, Max Gau, Edouard Romano, Nikolaos Koutsouvelis, Pelagia G. Tsoutsou\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy and remain a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used and is frequently delivered by hypo-fractionnated volumetric modulated arc therapy using non-coplanar beams, where geometric accuracy and planning margins are a major concern.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>To give a practical analysis of intrafraction patient motion for multi-target, single isocentre, brain SRS treatments and to derive adapted GTV-to-PTV margins.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Data of 154 lesions, spread over 85 fractions from 56 patients treated in our institution with the Varian HyperArc SRS solution was processed. Intrafraction patient motion were recorded using an Optical Surface Monitoring System during irradiation. The present study focuses on small tumor volumes, roughly equal or inferior to 1.5 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msup>\\n <mi>cm</mi>\\n <mn>3</mn>\\n </msup>\\n <annotation>${\\\\rm cm}^3$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>, and frameless mask-based immobilization. For each treatment session, a tumor displacement vector matrix was calculated from the patient drifts as a function of time. Data were combined together into a representative treatment scenario and the dosimetric impact of GTV displacement was calculated.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Recommended margins due to patient motion range between 0.3 and 1 mm, depending on the distance tumor-isocentre, and the desired GTV edge dose coverage. Those values should be added quadratically with other sources of uncertainty, such as mechanical isocentre and kV-MV misalignment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thorough analysis of intrafraction patient motion was performed, the dosimetric impact was calculated for different scenarios, and adequate GTV-to-PTV margins were derived. These values vary according to the distance isocentre-to-GTV, as well as the desired dose coverage, and should be chosen adequately.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11540056/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14405\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14405","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Margin derivation from intrafraction patient motion of multi-target, single isocentre, brain stereotactic radiosurgery treatments
Background
Brain metastases are the most common intracranial malignancy and remain a substantial source of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. Linear accelerator based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is widely used and is frequently delivered by hypo-fractionnated volumetric modulated arc therapy using non-coplanar beams, where geometric accuracy and planning margins are a major concern.
Purpose
To give a practical analysis of intrafraction patient motion for multi-target, single isocentre, brain SRS treatments and to derive adapted GTV-to-PTV margins.
Methods
Data of 154 lesions, spread over 85 fractions from 56 patients treated in our institution with the Varian HyperArc SRS solution was processed. Intrafraction patient motion were recorded using an Optical Surface Monitoring System during irradiation. The present study focuses on small tumor volumes, roughly equal or inferior to 1.5 , and frameless mask-based immobilization. For each treatment session, a tumor displacement vector matrix was calculated from the patient drifts as a function of time. Data were combined together into a representative treatment scenario and the dosimetric impact of GTV displacement was calculated.
Results
Recommended margins due to patient motion range between 0.3 and 1 mm, depending on the distance tumor-isocentre, and the desired GTV edge dose coverage. Those values should be added quadratically with other sources of uncertainty, such as mechanical isocentre and kV-MV misalignment.
Conclusion
Thorough analysis of intrafraction patient motion was performed, the dosimetric impact was calculated for different scenarios, and adequate GTV-to-PTV margins were derived. These values vary according to the distance isocentre-to-GTV, as well as the desired dose coverage, and should be chosen adequately.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic