机器人辅助直肠切除术的人工智能混合生存评估系统:回顾性队列研究

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1200/PO.24.00089
Shiqian Zhang, Ge Zhang, Ming Wang, Song-Bin Guo, Fuqi Wang, Yun Li, Kaisaierjiang Kadier, Zhaokai Zhou, Pengpeng Zhang, Hao Chi, Chuchu Zhang, Quanbo Zhou, Pin Lyu, Shuaiya Zhao, Shuaixi Yang, Weitang Yuan
{"title":"机器人辅助直肠切除术的人工智能混合生存评估系统:回顾性队列研究","authors":"Shiqian Zhang, Ge Zhang, Ming Wang, Song-Bin Guo, Fuqi Wang, Yun Li, Kaisaierjiang Kadier, Zhaokai Zhou, Pengpeng Zhang, Hao Chi, Chuchu Zhang, Quanbo Zhou, Pin Lyu, Shuaiya Zhao, Shuaixi Yang, Weitang Yuan","doi":"10.1200/PO.24.00089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach for patients with rectal cancer in recent years; although good postoperative patient recovery with accurate prediction is a guarantee of adaptive surveillance management, there is still a lack of easy-to-use prognostic tools and risk scores designed specifically for those patients undergoing RAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the electronic health records of 506 RAP participants, including a National Specialist Center for da Vinci Robotic Colorectal Surgery (NSCVRCS) meta cohort, and an independent external validation Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital cohort. In the NSCVRCS meta cohort, patients were divided into a discovery cohort (70%, n = 268), where the best-fit model was applied to model our prediction system, RAP-AIscore. Subsequently, an internal validation process for RAP-AIscore was conducted using a replication cohort (30%, n = 116). The study designed and implemented a large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) hybrid framework to identify the best strategy for building a survival assessment system, the RAP-AIscore, from 132 potential modeling scenarios through a combination of iterative cross-validation, Monte Carlo cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling. The 10 variables most relevant to clinical interpretability were identified on the basis of the AI hybrid optimal model values, which helps provide reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consistent evaluation of discrimination, calibration, generalization, and prognostic value across cohorts reaffirmed the accuracy and robust extrapolation capability of this system. The 10 feature variables most associated with clinical interpretability on the basis of Shapley values were identified, facilitating reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a promising and informative tool, the RAP-AIscore, which can be explained through nomograms for interpreting clinical outcomes. It facilitates postoperative risk stratification management and enhances clinical management of prognosis for RAP patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"8 ","pages":"e2400089"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial Intelligence Hybrid Survival Assessment System for Robot-Assisted Proctectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shiqian Zhang, Ge Zhang, Ming Wang, Song-Bin Guo, Fuqi Wang, Yun Li, Kaisaierjiang Kadier, Zhaokai Zhou, Pengpeng Zhang, Hao Chi, Chuchu Zhang, Quanbo Zhou, Pin Lyu, Shuaiya Zhao, Shuaixi Yang, Weitang Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO.24.00089\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach for patients with rectal cancer in recent years; although good postoperative patient recovery with accurate prediction is a guarantee of adaptive surveillance management, there is still a lack of easy-to-use prognostic tools and risk scores designed specifically for those patients undergoing RAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used the electronic health records of 506 RAP participants, including a National Specialist Center for da Vinci Robotic Colorectal Surgery (NSCVRCS) meta cohort, and an independent external validation Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital cohort. In the NSCVRCS meta cohort, patients were divided into a discovery cohort (70%, n = 268), where the best-fit model was applied to model our prediction system, RAP-AIscore. Subsequently, an internal validation process for RAP-AIscore was conducted using a replication cohort (30%, n = 116). The study designed and implemented a large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) hybrid framework to identify the best strategy for building a survival assessment system, the RAP-AIscore, from 132 potential modeling scenarios through a combination of iterative cross-validation, Monte Carlo cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling. The 10 variables most relevant to clinical interpretability were identified on the basis of the AI hybrid optimal model values, which helps provide reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consistent evaluation of discrimination, calibration, generalization, and prognostic value across cohorts reaffirmed the accuracy and robust extrapolation capability of this system. The 10 feature variables most associated with clinical interpretability on the basis of Shapley values were identified, facilitating reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study introduces a promising and informative tool, the RAP-AIscore, which can be explained through nomograms for interpreting clinical outcomes. It facilitates postoperative risk stratification management and enhances clinical management of prognosis for RAP patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e2400089\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00089\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO.24.00089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的近年来,机器人辅助直肠切除术(RAP)已成为直肠癌患者的主要手术方式;虽然术后患者恢复良好且预测准确是适应性监测管理的保证,但目前仍缺乏专为RAP患者设计的易于使用的预后工具和风险评分:本研究使用了506名RAP参与者的电子病历,包括国家达芬奇机器人结直肠手术专科中心(NSCVRCS)的元队列和独立外部验证的中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院队列。在NSCVRCS元队列中,患者被分为发现队列(70%,n = 268),其中最佳拟合模型被用于建立我们的预测系统RAP-AIscore。随后,利用复制队列(30%,n = 116)对 RAP-AIscore 进行了内部验证。该研究设计并实施了一个大规模人工智能(AI)混合框架,通过迭代交叉验证、蒙特卡罗交叉验证和引导重采样相结合的方法,从 132 种潜在建模方案中找出建立生存评估系统 RAP-AIscore 的最佳策略。在人工智能混合最佳模型值的基础上,确定了与临床可解释性最相关的 10 个变量,这有助于为新患者提供可靠的预后生存指导:结果:对不同队列的区分度、校准、泛化和预后价值的一致评估再次证明了该系统的准确性和强大的外推能力。根据沙普利值确定了与临床可解释性最相关的 10 个特征变量,从而为新患者提供了可靠的预后生存指导:本研究介绍了一种前景广阔、信息丰富的工具--RAP-AIscore,它可以通过提名图来解释临床结果。它有助于术后风险分层管理,加强对 RAP 患者预后的临床管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Artificial Intelligence Hybrid Survival Assessment System for Robot-Assisted Proctectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Purpose: Robotic-assisted proctectomy (RAP) has emerged as the predominant surgical approach for patients with rectal cancer in recent years; although good postoperative patient recovery with accurate prediction is a guarantee of adaptive surveillance management, there is still a lack of easy-to-use prognostic tools and risk scores designed specifically for those patients undergoing RAP.

Methods: This study used the electronic health records of 506 RAP participants, including a National Specialist Center for da Vinci Robotic Colorectal Surgery (NSCVRCS) meta cohort, and an independent external validation Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital cohort. In the NSCVRCS meta cohort, patients were divided into a discovery cohort (70%, n = 268), where the best-fit model was applied to model our prediction system, RAP-AIscore. Subsequently, an internal validation process for RAP-AIscore was conducted using a replication cohort (30%, n = 116). The study designed and implemented a large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) hybrid framework to identify the best strategy for building a survival assessment system, the RAP-AIscore, from 132 potential modeling scenarios through a combination of iterative cross-validation, Monte Carlo cross-validation, and bootstrap resampling. The 10 variables most relevant to clinical interpretability were identified on the basis of the AI hybrid optimal model values, which helps provide reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.

Results: The consistent evaluation of discrimination, calibration, generalization, and prognostic value across cohorts reaffirmed the accuracy and robust extrapolation capability of this system. The 10 feature variables most associated with clinical interpretability on the basis of Shapley values were identified, facilitating reliable prognostic survival guidance for new patients.

Conclusion: This study introduces a promising and informative tool, the RAP-AIscore, which can be explained through nomograms for interpreting clinical outcomes. It facilitates postoperative risk stratification management and enhances clinical management of prognosis for RAP patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信