四维动态通气 CT 对边缘可切除局部晚期食管癌的临床实用性。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1
Shioto Oda, Hirofumi Kuno, Takeo Fujita, Takashi Hiyama, Daisuke Kotani, Tomohiro Kadota, Shingo Sakashita, Tatsushi Kobayashi
{"title":"四维动态通气 CT 对边缘可切除局部晚期食管癌的临床实用性。","authors":"Shioto Oda, Hirofumi Kuno, Takeo Fujita, Takashi Hiyama, Daisuke Kotani, Tomohiro Kadota, Shingo Sakashita, Tatsushi Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT (4DCT) for assessing resectability in borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (BR-LAEC) and confirmed the pathological validity of the 4DCT results in surgery without prior treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients (107 men; median age, 68 [range, 43-89] years) diagnosed with BR-LAEC on initial conventional CT (i-CT). These patients were initially classified into three categories: BR1 (closer to resectable), BR2 (resectability not assessable), or BR3 (closer to unresectable). Subsequent 4DCT reclassified patients as either resectable or unresectable within 1 week of i-CT. We analyzed the diagnostic shift induced by 4DCT. Additionally, 18 patients who underwent surgery without prior treatment were evaluated using 4DCT and pathological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4DCT reclassified patients with BR-LAEC as resectable (57.0%; 73/128) and unresectable (43.0%; 55/128). Of 53 patients initially classified as BR1, 32.1% (17/53) were reclassified as unresectable, and of 47 patients initially classified as BR3, 46.8% (22/47) were reclassified as resectable. Among 28 patients initially classified as BR2, 53.6% (15/27) were reclassified as resectable and 46.4% (13/27) as unresectable. In the surgery-only cohort of 18 patients, 9 were initially classified as BR1 and 9 as BR2, and all were reclassified as resectable. These patients were pathologically confirmed to have resectable disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>4DCT may provide information complementary to that provided by initial conventional CT in assessing resectability among patients with BR-LAEC, and could be a useful adjunct tool for guiding clinical decisions in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"434-444"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868203/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical usefulness of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT for borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Shioto Oda, Hirofumi Kuno, Takeo Fujita, Takashi Hiyama, Daisuke Kotani, Tomohiro Kadota, Shingo Sakashita, Tatsushi Kobayashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT (4DCT) for assessing resectability in borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (BR-LAEC) and confirmed the pathological validity of the 4DCT results in surgery without prior treatment.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients (107 men; median age, 68 [range, 43-89] years) diagnosed with BR-LAEC on initial conventional CT (i-CT). These patients were initially classified into three categories: BR1 (closer to resectable), BR2 (resectability not assessable), or BR3 (closer to unresectable). Subsequent 4DCT reclassified patients as either resectable or unresectable within 1 week of i-CT. We analyzed the diagnostic shift induced by 4DCT. Additionally, 18 patients who underwent surgery without prior treatment were evaluated using 4DCT and pathological outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4DCT reclassified patients with BR-LAEC as resectable (57.0%; 73/128) and unresectable (43.0%; 55/128). Of 53 patients initially classified as BR1, 32.1% (17/53) were reclassified as unresectable, and of 47 patients initially classified as BR3, 46.8% (22/47) were reclassified as resectable. Among 28 patients initially classified as BR2, 53.6% (15/27) were reclassified as resectable and 46.4% (13/27) as unresectable. In the surgery-only cohort of 18 patients, 9 were initially classified as BR1 and 9 as BR2, and all were reclassified as resectable. These patients were pathologically confirmed to have resectable disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>4DCT may provide information complementary to that provided by initial conventional CT in assessing resectability among patients with BR-LAEC, and could be a useful adjunct tool for guiding clinical decisions in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"434-444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11868203/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01678-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在评估四维动态通气 CT(4DCT)在评估边缘可切除局部晚期食管癌(BR-LAEC)可切除性方面的临床意义,并证实 4DCT 结果在未经治疗的手术中的病理学有效性:我们回顾性地检查了128例患者(107例男性,中位年龄68岁[43-89岁]),这些患者在初次常规CT(i-CT)检查中被诊断为BR-LAEC。这些患者最初被分为三类:BR1(接近可切除)、BR2(可切除性无法评估)或 BR3(接近不可切除)。随后的 4DCT 在 i-CT 1 周内将患者重新分类为可切除或不可切除。我们分析了 4DCT 引起的诊断转变。此外,我们还使用 4DCT 和病理结果评估了 18 例未经事先治疗而接受手术的患者:4DCT将BR-LAEC患者重新分类为可切除(57.0%;73/128)和不可切除(43.0%;55/128)。在最初被分类为 BR1 的 53 例患者中,32.1%(17/53)被重新分类为不可切除;在最初被分类为 BR3 的 47 例患者中,46.8%(22/47)被重新分类为可切除。在最初被归类为BR2的28名患者中,53.6%(15/27)被重新归类为可切除,46.4%(13/27)被重新归类为不可切除。在仅进行手术的 18 例患者中,9 例最初被归类为 BR1,9 例被归类为 BR2,所有患者均被重新归类为可切除。这些患者均经病理证实为可切除疾病:结论:在评估BR-LAEC患者的可切除性时,4DCT可提供与初始常规CT互补的信息,可作为一种有用的辅助工具来指导这类患者的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical usefulness of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT for borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of four-dimensional dynamic ventilation CT (4DCT) for assessing resectability in borderline resectable locally advanced esophageal cancer (BR-LAEC) and confirmed the pathological validity of the 4DCT results in surgery without prior treatment.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed 128 patients (107 men; median age, 68 [range, 43-89] years) diagnosed with BR-LAEC on initial conventional CT (i-CT). These patients were initially classified into three categories: BR1 (closer to resectable), BR2 (resectability not assessable), or BR3 (closer to unresectable). Subsequent 4DCT reclassified patients as either resectable or unresectable within 1 week of i-CT. We analyzed the diagnostic shift induced by 4DCT. Additionally, 18 patients who underwent surgery without prior treatment were evaluated using 4DCT and pathological outcomes.

Results: 4DCT reclassified patients with BR-LAEC as resectable (57.0%; 73/128) and unresectable (43.0%; 55/128). Of 53 patients initially classified as BR1, 32.1% (17/53) were reclassified as unresectable, and of 47 patients initially classified as BR3, 46.8% (22/47) were reclassified as resectable. Among 28 patients initially classified as BR2, 53.6% (15/27) were reclassified as resectable and 46.4% (13/27) as unresectable. In the surgery-only cohort of 18 patients, 9 were initially classified as BR1 and 9 as BR2, and all were reclassified as resectable. These patients were pathologically confirmed to have resectable disease.

Conclusions: 4DCT may provide information complementary to that provided by initial conventional CT in assessing resectability among patients with BR-LAEC, and could be a useful adjunct tool for guiding clinical decisions in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信