18F-FDG PET/MRI 对背部手术失败综合征评估的附加值:与非对比 MRI 的比较。

IF 2.1 4区 医学
Japanese Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1007/s11604-024-01679-0
Yu-Shiou Weng, Chi-Tun Tang, Wei-Chou Chang, Guo-Shu Huang, Chuang-Hsin Chiu, Shih-Wei Chiang, Chia-Wei Lee, Yi-Chih Hsu
{"title":"18F-FDG PET/MRI 对背部手术失败综合征评估的附加值:与非对比 MRI 的比较。","authors":"Yu-Shiou Weng, Chi-Tun Tang, Wei-Chou Chang, Guo-Shu Huang, Chuang-Hsin Chiu, Shih-Wei Chiang, Chia-Wei Lee, Yi-Chih Hsu","doi":"10.1007/s11604-024-01679-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given increasing research suggesting the utility of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in identifying the pain generator of low back pain, our study aims to assess its effectiveness in evaluating the source of pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by comparing the performance of fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/MRI with conventional MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with FBSS who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and MRI of the lumbar vertebrae and lower extremities for undetermined sources of pain. We assessed 1) The diagnostic reliability and efficacy of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI according to correct differential diagnosis, affected level, and affected side of the pain source compared to the findings of selective root or peripheral nerve block or revision lumbar spine surgery; and 2) The association between standardized uptake value (SUV) and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) threshold and accuracy of the suspected pathology on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30 included patients, the diagnostic accuracy of pain source recognition was higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI than for MRI alone (1.0 vs. 0.4 in spinal disease and 0.8 vs. 0 in lower extremity disease, both p < 0.05). SUVR values of 1.4-1.5 showed the highest accuracy (0.93), higher than the accuracy obtained using the SUV threshold (0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI added value to MRI alone in detecting of hypermetabolic activity associated with pain from spinal and non-spinal sources.</p>","PeriodicalId":14691,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"509-519"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Added value of 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI for evaluation of failed back surgery syndrome: comparison with non-contrast MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Shiou Weng, Chi-Tun Tang, Wei-Chou Chang, Guo-Shu Huang, Chuang-Hsin Chiu, Shih-Wei Chiang, Chia-Wei Lee, Yi-Chih Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11604-024-01679-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Given increasing research suggesting the utility of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in identifying the pain generator of low back pain, our study aims to assess its effectiveness in evaluating the source of pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by comparing the performance of fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) PET/MRI with conventional MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with FBSS who underwent <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET and MRI of the lumbar vertebrae and lower extremities for undetermined sources of pain. We assessed 1) The diagnostic reliability and efficacy of MRI and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI according to correct differential diagnosis, affected level, and affected side of the pain source compared to the findings of selective root or peripheral nerve block or revision lumbar spine surgery; and 2) The association between standardized uptake value (SUV) and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) threshold and accuracy of the suspected pathology on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 30 included patients, the diagnostic accuracy of pain source recognition was higher for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI than for MRI alone (1.0 vs. 0.4 in spinal disease and 0.8 vs. 0 in lower extremity disease, both p < 0.05). SUVR values of 1.4-1.5 showed the highest accuracy (0.93), higher than the accuracy obtained using the SUV threshold (0.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong><sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/MRI added value to MRI alone in detecting of hypermetabolic activity associated with pain from spinal and non-spinal sources.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14691,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"509-519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01679-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-024-01679-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的鉴于越来越多的研究表明正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)可用于确定腰背痛的致痛源,我们的研究旨在通过比较氟-18标记的氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)PET/MRI与传统磁共振成像的性能,评估其在评估腰背手术失败综合征(FBSS)患者疼痛源方面的有效性:我们回顾性分析了因疼痛来源不明而接受 18F-FDG PET 和腰椎及下肢 MRI 检查的 FBSS 患者的数据。我们评估了 1) MRI 和 18F-FDG PET/MRI 与选择性根或周围神经阻滞或腰椎翻修手术结果相比,根据疼痛源的正确鉴别诊断、受累水平和受累侧进行诊断的可靠性和有效性;以及 2) 标准化摄取值(SUV)和标准化摄取值比(SUVR)阈值与 18F-FDG PET/MRI 可疑病理的准确性之间的关联:结果:在纳入的 30 名患者中,18F-FDG PET/MRI 对痛源识别的诊断准确率高于单纯 MRI(脊柱疾病为 1.0 比 0.4,下肢疾病为 0.8 比 0,均为 p 结论:18F-FDG PET/MRI 在检测与脊柱和非脊柱痛源相关的高代谢活动方面比单纯 MRI 更有价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Added value of 18Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI for evaluation of failed back surgery syndrome: comparison with non-contrast MRI.

Objectives: Given increasing research suggesting the utility of positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) in identifying the pain generator of low back pain, our study aims to assess its effectiveness in evaluating the source of pain in patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) by comparing the performance of fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/MRI with conventional MRI.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with FBSS who underwent 18F-FDG PET and MRI of the lumbar vertebrae and lower extremities for undetermined sources of pain. We assessed 1) The diagnostic reliability and efficacy of MRI and 18F-FDG PET/MRI according to correct differential diagnosis, affected level, and affected side of the pain source compared to the findings of selective root or peripheral nerve block or revision lumbar spine surgery; and 2) The association between standardized uptake value (SUV) and standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) threshold and accuracy of the suspected pathology on 18F-FDG PET/MRI.

Results: Among 30 included patients, the diagnostic accuracy of pain source recognition was higher for 18F-FDG PET/MRI than for MRI alone (1.0 vs. 0.4 in spinal disease and 0.8 vs. 0 in lower extremity disease, both p < 0.05). SUVR values of 1.4-1.5 showed the highest accuracy (0.93), higher than the accuracy obtained using the SUV threshold (0.87).

Conclusion: 18F-FDG PET/MRI added value to MRI alone in detecting of hypermetabolic activity associated with pain from spinal and non-spinal sources.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Radiology
Japanese Journal of Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
自引率
4.80%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Radiology is a peer-reviewed journal, officially published by the Japan Radiological Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a forum for the publication of papers documenting recent advances and new developments in the field of radiology in medicine and biology. The scope of Japanese Journal of Radiology encompasses but is not restricted to diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, radiation oncology, nuclear medicine, radiation physics, and radiation biology. Additionally, the journal covers technical and industrial innovations. The journal welcomes original articles, technical notes, review articles, pictorial essays and letters to the editor. The journal also provides announcements from the boards and the committees of the society. Membership in the Japan Radiological Society is not a prerequisite for submission. Contributions are welcomed from all parts of the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信