交换系统和程序对接受 CAPD 的 ESKD 患者长期腹膜炎的影响:一项回顾性队列比较研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Iranian journal of kidney diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-20
Phongsak Dandecha, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai
{"title":"交换系统和程序对接受 CAPD 的 ESKD 患者长期腹膜炎的影响:一项回顾性队列比较研究。","authors":"Phongsak Dandecha, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis utilizes two distinct double-bag exchange systems (ANDY-Disc from Fresenius Medical Care in Bad Homburg, Germany, and DIANEAL from Baxter in Deerfield, IL). These systems are widely used across the globe. The long-term outcomes of peritonitis with different types of treatment are still questionable. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the long-term impact of these two distinct exchange procedures on the true peritonitis rate and the technique durability in real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients, treated with a double-bag exchange system in a Songklanagarind Hospital, located in the south of Thailand from January 2009 to December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of peritonitis by treatment arm (ANDY-disc and DIANEAL). Secondary outcomes included the pathogenic organism causing peritonitis, time to the first peritonitis, and survival technique between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peritonitis rate for patients using the ANDY-disc in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was 0.28 episodes per patient-year, while the DIANEAL group had a rate of 0.29 episodes per patient-year. There was no difference in the peritonitis rate between the two groups (P = .816). Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis accounted for 33.4% in the ANDY-disc arm and 43.7% in the DIANEAL arm. The 10-year technique survival was 86.1% in the ANDY-Disc group and 73.5% in the DIANEAL group; this did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ANDY-Disc and DIANEAL exchange systems are comparable in the long-term incidence of peritonitis. Both systems have similar long-term technique survival. However, this should be confirmed by a high-quality trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":14610,"journal":{"name":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","volume":"18 4","pages":"212-220"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Exchange Systems and Procedure on Long Term Peritonitis in ESKD Patients Undergoing CAPD :A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Phongsak Dandecha, Atthaphong Phongphithakchai\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peritoneal dialysis utilizes two distinct double-bag exchange systems (ANDY-Disc from Fresenius Medical Care in Bad Homburg, Germany, and DIANEAL from Baxter in Deerfield, IL). These systems are widely used across the globe. The long-term outcomes of peritonitis with different types of treatment are still questionable. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the long-term impact of these two distinct exchange procedures on the true peritonitis rate and the technique durability in real-world settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and twenty patients, treated with a double-bag exchange system in a Songklanagarind Hospital, located in the south of Thailand from January 2009 to December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of peritonitis by treatment arm (ANDY-disc and DIANEAL). Secondary outcomes included the pathogenic organism causing peritonitis, time to the first peritonitis, and survival technique between the two systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The peritonitis rate for patients using the ANDY-disc in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was 0.28 episodes per patient-year, while the DIANEAL group had a rate of 0.29 episodes per patient-year. There was no difference in the peritonitis rate between the two groups (P = .816). Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis accounted for 33.4% in the ANDY-disc arm and 43.7% in the DIANEAL arm. The 10-year technique survival was 86.1% in the ANDY-Disc group and 73.5% in the DIANEAL group; this did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ANDY-Disc and DIANEAL exchange systems are comparable in the long-term incidence of peritonitis. Both systems have similar long-term technique survival. However, this should be confirmed by a high-quality trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"volume\":\"18 4\",\"pages\":\"212-220\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian journal of kidney diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian journal of kidney diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:腹膜透析使用两种不同的双袋交换系统(德国巴德洪堡费森尤斯医疗用品公司的ANDY-Disc和伊利诺伊州迪尔菲尔德百特公司的DIANEAL)。这些系统在全球广泛使用。不同类型治疗腹膜炎的长期疗效仍有疑问。因此,我们进行了一项回顾性队列比较研究,以评估这两种不同的交换程序对真实腹膜炎率和实际环境中技术耐久性的长期影响:研究纳入了 2009 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月在泰国南部 Songklanagarind 医院接受双袋交换系统治疗的 120 名患者。主要结果是治疗组(ANDY-disc 和 DIANEAL)的腹膜炎发生率。次要结果包括引起腹膜炎的病原体、首次腹膜炎的时间以及两种治疗方法的存活率:结果:在持续非卧床腹膜透析(CAPD)中使用 ANDY-Disc 的患者腹膜炎发病率为 0.28 次/年,而 DIANEAL 组的发病率为 0.29 次/年。两组腹膜炎发病率无差异(P = .816)。革兰氏阳性菌腹膜炎在 ANDY-Disc 组中占 33.4%,在 DIANEAL 组中占 43.7%。ANDY-Disc组的10年技术存活率为86.1%,DIANEAL组为73.5%;这没有达到统计学意义:结论:在腹膜炎的长期发生率方面,ANDY-Disc 和 DIANEAL 交换系统不相上下。两种系统的长期技术存活率相似。不过,这一点应通过高质量的试验来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Exchange Systems and Procedure on Long Term Peritonitis in ESKD Patients Undergoing CAPD :A Retrospective Comparative Cohort Study.

Introduction: Peritoneal dialysis utilizes two distinct double-bag exchange systems (ANDY-Disc from Fresenius Medical Care in Bad Homburg, Germany, and DIANEAL from Baxter in Deerfield, IL). These systems are widely used across the globe. The long-term outcomes of peritonitis with different types of treatment are still questionable. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective comparative cohort study to assess the long-term impact of these two distinct exchange procedures on the true peritonitis rate and the technique durability in real-world settings.

Methods: One hundred and twenty patients, treated with a double-bag exchange system in a Songklanagarind Hospital, located in the south of Thailand from January 2009 to December 2020 were included. The primary outcome was the incidence rate of peritonitis by treatment arm (ANDY-disc and DIANEAL). Secondary outcomes included the pathogenic organism causing peritonitis, time to the first peritonitis, and survival technique between the two systems.

Results: The peritonitis rate for patients using the ANDY-disc in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) was 0.28 episodes per patient-year, while the DIANEAL group had a rate of 0.29 episodes per patient-year. There was no difference in the peritonitis rate between the two groups (P = .816). Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis accounted for 33.4% in the ANDY-disc arm and 43.7% in the DIANEAL arm. The 10-year technique survival was 86.1% in the ANDY-Disc group and 73.5% in the DIANEAL group; this did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion: The ANDY-Disc and DIANEAL exchange systems are comparable in the long-term incidence of peritonitis. Both systems have similar long-term technique survival. However, this should be confirmed by a high-quality trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian journal of kidney diseases
Iranian journal of kidney diseases UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Iranian Journal of Kidney Diseases (IJKD), a peer-reviewed journal in English, is the official publication of the Iranian Society of Nephrology. The aim of the IJKD is the worldwide reflection of the knowledge produced by the scientists and clinicians in nephrology. Published quarterly, the IJKD provides a new platform for advancement of the field. The journal’s objective is to serve as a focal point for debates and exchange of knowledge and experience among researchers in a global context. Original papers, case reports, and invited reviews on all aspects of the kidney diseases, hypertension, dialysis, and transplantation will be covered by the IJKD. Research on the basic science, clinical practice, and socio-economics of renal health are all welcomed by the editors of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信