成本不同的头孢曲松品牌对大肠埃希菌的体外表现:坦桑尼亚姆贝亚一家三级转诊医院的启示。

IF 3.7 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/jacamr/dlae162
Anthony Nsojo, Christopher Mbotwa, Linus Rweyemamu, Godlove Mbwanji, Frank Wilson, Lutengano George, Davance Mwasomola, Clement N Mweya, Issakwisa Mwakyula
{"title":"成本不同的头孢曲松品牌对大肠埃希菌的体外表现:坦桑尼亚姆贝亚一家三级转诊医院的启示。","authors":"Anthony Nsojo, Christopher Mbotwa, Linus Rweyemamu, Godlove Mbwanji, Frank Wilson, Lutengano George, Davance Mwasomola, Clement N Mweya, Issakwisa Mwakyula","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlae162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Tanzania, ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. However, there is quite a significant variation in cost for numerous ceftriaxone brands, leading to the perception that pricier options are more effective. Yet, limited empirical data support this perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five ceftriaxone brands with a wide price range were tested <i>in vitro</i> against a ceftriaxone-sensitive <i>Escherichia coli</i> clinical isolate using microdilution and spectrophotometry. Brands were evaluated across a spectrum of concentrations. Bacterial growth inhibition was measured using optical density. Analysis of variance was used to compare the bacterial optical densities among the brands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All brands were comparable at all tested concentrations, with peak inhibition above 1.95 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite significant price disparities, low-cost and high-cost ceftriaxone brands demonstrated similar <i>in vitro</i> performance against <i>E. coli</i>. This challenges the notion that higher-priced options offer better performance. Further, <i>in vivo</i> studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472144/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"<i>In vitro</i> performance of cost differentiated ceftriaxone brands against <i>Escherichia coli</i>: insights from a tertiary referral hospital in Mbeya, Tanzania.\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Nsojo, Christopher Mbotwa, Linus Rweyemamu, Godlove Mbwanji, Frank Wilson, Lutengano George, Davance Mwasomola, Clement N Mweya, Issakwisa Mwakyula\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlae162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Tanzania, ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. However, there is quite a significant variation in cost for numerous ceftriaxone brands, leading to the perception that pricier options are more effective. Yet, limited empirical data support this perception.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five ceftriaxone brands with a wide price range were tested <i>in vitro</i> against a ceftriaxone-sensitive <i>Escherichia coli</i> clinical isolate using microdilution and spectrophotometry. Brands were evaluated across a spectrum of concentrations. Bacterial growth inhibition was measured using optical density. Analysis of variance was used to compare the bacterial optical densities among the brands.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All brands were comparable at all tested concentrations, with peak inhibition above 1.95 mg/L.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite significant price disparities, low-cost and high-cost ceftriaxone brands demonstrated similar <i>in vitro</i> performance against <i>E. coli</i>. This challenges the notion that higher-priced options offer better performance. Further, <i>in vivo</i> studies are recommended to validate these findings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472144/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae162\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlae162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在坦桑尼亚,头孢曲松是最常用的处方抗生素之一。然而,许多头孢曲松品牌的价格差异很大,导致人们认为价格高的抗生素更有效。然而,支持这种观点的经验数据却很有限:方法:使用微量稀释法和分光光度法对五种价格差异较大的头孢曲松品牌进行了体外测试,以检测对头孢曲松敏感的大肠埃希菌临床分离株。对不同浓度的品牌进行了评估。使用光密度测量细菌生长抑制率。方差分析用于比较各品牌的细菌光密度:结果:在所有测试浓度下,所有品牌的抑菌效果都相当,抑菌峰值高于 1.95 mg/L:结论:尽管价格相差悬殊,但低价和高价头孢曲松品牌对大肠杆菌的体外表现相似。这对价格越高性能越好的观点提出了质疑。建议进一步开展体内研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
In vitro performance of cost differentiated ceftriaxone brands against Escherichia coli: insights from a tertiary referral hospital in Mbeya, Tanzania.

Background: In Tanzania, ceftriaxone is one of the most commonly prescribed antibiotics. However, there is quite a significant variation in cost for numerous ceftriaxone brands, leading to the perception that pricier options are more effective. Yet, limited empirical data support this perception.

Methods: Five ceftriaxone brands with a wide price range were tested in vitro against a ceftriaxone-sensitive Escherichia coli clinical isolate using microdilution and spectrophotometry. Brands were evaluated across a spectrum of concentrations. Bacterial growth inhibition was measured using optical density. Analysis of variance was used to compare the bacterial optical densities among the brands.

Results: All brands were comparable at all tested concentrations, with peak inhibition above 1.95 mg/L.

Conclusions: Despite significant price disparities, low-cost and high-cost ceftriaxone brands demonstrated similar in vitro performance against E. coli. This challenges the notion that higher-priced options offer better performance. Further, in vivo studies are recommended to validate these findings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信