评估大型学术医疗系统中中心静脉相关血流感染风险的种族、民族和社会经济差异。

IF 3 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lindsey B Gottlieb, Radhika Prakash-Asrani, William Dube, Zanthia Wiley, Giancarlo Licitra, Scott K Fridkin
{"title":"评估大型学术医疗系统中中心静脉相关血流感染风险的种族、民族和社会经济差异。","authors":"Lindsey B Gottlieb, Radhika Prakash-Asrani, William Dube, Zanthia Wiley, Giancarlo Licitra, Scott K Fridkin","doi":"10.1017/ice.2024.133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) while accounting for inherent differences in CLABSI risk related to central venous catheter (CVC) type.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute care facilities within an academic healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult inpatients from January 2012 through December 2017 with CVC present for ≥2 contiguous days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe variability in demographics, comorbidities, CVC type/configuration, and CLABSI rate by patient's race and ethnicity. We estimated the unadjusted risk of CLABSI for each demographic and clinical characteristic and then modelled the effect of race on time to CLABSI, adjusting for total parenteral nutrition use and CVC type. We also performed exploratory analysis replacing race and ethnicity with social vulnerability index (SVI) metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32,925 patients with 57,642 CVC episodes met inclusion criteria, most of which (51,348, 89%) were among non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black patients. CVC types differed between race/ethnicity groups. However, after adjusting for CVC type, configuration, and indication in an adjusted cox regression, the risk of CLABSI among non-Hispanic Black patients did not significantly differ from non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.51). The odds of having a CLABSI among the most vulnerable SVI subset compared to the less vulnerable was no different (odds ratio [OR] 0.95; 95% CI: 0.75-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find a difference in CLABSI risk between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients when adjusting for CLABSI risk inherent in type and configuration of CVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing for race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in a large academic health system.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsey B Gottlieb, Radhika Prakash-Asrani, William Dube, Zanthia Wiley, Giancarlo Licitra, Scott K Fridkin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2024.133\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) while accounting for inherent differences in CLABSI risk related to central venous catheter (CVC) type.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort analysis.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Acute care facilities within an academic healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adult inpatients from January 2012 through December 2017 with CVC present for ≥2 contiguous days.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We describe variability in demographics, comorbidities, CVC type/configuration, and CLABSI rate by patient's race and ethnicity. We estimated the unadjusted risk of CLABSI for each demographic and clinical characteristic and then modelled the effect of race on time to CLABSI, adjusting for total parenteral nutrition use and CVC type. We also performed exploratory analysis replacing race and ethnicity with social vulnerability index (SVI) metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32,925 patients with 57,642 CVC episodes met inclusion criteria, most of which (51,348, 89%) were among non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black patients. CVC types differed between race/ethnicity groups. However, after adjusting for CVC type, configuration, and indication in an adjusted cox regression, the risk of CLABSI among non-Hispanic Black patients did not significantly differ from non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.51). The odds of having a CLABSI among the most vulnerable SVI subset compared to the less vulnerable was no different (odds ratio [OR] 0.95; 95% CI: 0.75-1.2).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We did not find a difference in CLABSI risk between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients when adjusting for CLABSI risk inherent in type and configuration of CVC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.133\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2024.133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究种族和民族与中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)之间的关系:研究种族和民族与中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)之间的关系,同时考虑与中心静脉导管(CVC)类型相关的CLABSI风险的固有差异:设计:回顾性队列分析:患者:2012 年 1 月起的成人住院患者:患者:2012年1月至2017年12月期间,CVC连续使用≥2天的成人住院患者:我们按患者的种族和民族描述了人口统计学、合并症、CVC 类型/配置和 CLABSI 感染率的差异。我们估算了每个人口统计学和临床特征的 CLABSI 未调整风险,然后模拟了种族对 CLABSI 发生时间的影响,并对总肠外营养的使用和 CVC 类型进行了调整。我们还进行了探索性分析,用社会脆弱性指数(SVI)指标替代了种族和民族:32,925 名患者的 57,642 次 CVC 使用符合纳入标准,其中大部分(51,348 次,89%)为非西班牙裔白人或非西班牙裔黑人患者。不同种族/族裔群体的 CVC 类型各不相同。然而,在调整后的 cox 回归中对 CVC 类型、配置和适应症进行调整后,非西班牙裔黑人患者发生 CLABSI 的风险与非西班牙裔白人患者并无显著差异(调整后危险比 [aHR] 1.19;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.94, 1.51)。最脆弱的 SVI 亚群与较不脆弱的亚群相比,发生 CLABSI 的几率没有差异(几率比 [OR] 0.95;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.75-1.2):结论:在对CVC类型和配置所固有的CLABSI风险进行调整后,我们没有发现非西班牙裔白人和非西班牙裔黑人患者的CLABSI风险存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing for race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infection risk in a large academic health system.

Objective: To examine the relationship between race and ethnicity and central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) while accounting for inherent differences in CLABSI risk related to central venous catheter (CVC) type.

Design: Retrospective cohort analysis.

Setting: Acute care facilities within an academic healthcare system.

Patients: Adult inpatients from January 2012 through December 2017 with CVC present for ≥2 contiguous days.

Methods: We describe variability in demographics, comorbidities, CVC type/configuration, and CLABSI rate by patient's race and ethnicity. We estimated the unadjusted risk of CLABSI for each demographic and clinical characteristic and then modelled the effect of race on time to CLABSI, adjusting for total parenteral nutrition use and CVC type. We also performed exploratory analysis replacing race and ethnicity with social vulnerability index (SVI) metrics.

Results: 32,925 patients with 57,642 CVC episodes met inclusion criteria, most of which (51,348, 89%) were among non-Hispanic White or non-Hispanic Black patients. CVC types differed between race/ethnicity groups. However, after adjusting for CVC type, configuration, and indication in an adjusted cox regression, the risk of CLABSI among non-Hispanic Black patients did not significantly differ from non-Hispanic White patients (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94, 1.51). The odds of having a CLABSI among the most vulnerable SVI subset compared to the less vulnerable was no different (odds ratio [OR] 0.95; 95% CI: 0.75-1.2).

Conclusions: We did not find a difference in CLABSI risk between non-Hispanic White and non-Hispanic Black patients when adjusting for CLABSI risk inherent in type and configuration of CVC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信