估算疫苗接种的影响:疫苗影响建模联合会第一阶段的经验教训。

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.15556.1
Katy A M Gaythorpe, Xiang Li, Hannah Clapham, Emily Dansereau, Rich Fitzjohn, Wes Hinsley, Daniel Hogan, Mark Jit, Tewodaj Mengistu, T Alex Perkins, Allison Portnoy, Emilia Vynnycky, Kim Woodruff, Neil M Ferguson, Caroline L Trotter
{"title":"估算疫苗接种的影响:疫苗影响建模联合会第一阶段的经验教训。","authors":"Katy A M Gaythorpe, Xiang Li, Hannah Clapham, Emily Dansereau, Rich Fitzjohn, Wes Hinsley, Daniel Hogan, Mark Jit, Tewodaj Mengistu, T Alex Perkins, Allison Portnoy, Emilia Vynnycky, Kim Woodruff, Neil M Ferguson, Caroline L Trotter","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.15556.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Estimates of the global health impact of immunisation are important for quantifying historical benefits as well as planning future investments and strategy. The Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) was established in 2016 to provide reliable estimates of the health impact of immunisation. In this article we examine the consortium in its first five-year phase. We detail how vaccine impact was defined and the methods used to estimate it as well as the technical infrastructure required to underpin robust reproducibility of the outputs. We highlight some of the applications of estimates to date, how these were communicated and what their effect were. Finally, we explore some of the lessons learnt and remaining challenges for estimating the impact of vaccines and forming effective modelling consortia then discuss how this may be addressed in the second phase of VIMC. Modelled estimates are not a replacement for surveillance; however, they can examine theoretical counterfactuals and highlight data gaps to complement other activities. VIMC has implemented strategies to produce robust, standardised estimates of immunisation impact. But through the first phase of the consortium, critical lessons have been learnt both on the technical infrastructure and the effective engagement with modellers and stakeholders. To be successful, a productive dialogue with estimate consumers, producers and stakeholders needs to be underpinned by a rigorous and transparent analytical framework as well as an approach for building expertise in the short and long term.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"8 ","pages":"97"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467163/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating the impact of vaccination: lessons learned in the first phase of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium.\",\"authors\":\"Katy A M Gaythorpe, Xiang Li, Hannah Clapham, Emily Dansereau, Rich Fitzjohn, Wes Hinsley, Daniel Hogan, Mark Jit, Tewodaj Mengistu, T Alex Perkins, Allison Portnoy, Emilia Vynnycky, Kim Woodruff, Neil M Ferguson, Caroline L Trotter\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/gatesopenres.15556.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Estimates of the global health impact of immunisation are important for quantifying historical benefits as well as planning future investments and strategy. The Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) was established in 2016 to provide reliable estimates of the health impact of immunisation. In this article we examine the consortium in its first five-year phase. We detail how vaccine impact was defined and the methods used to estimate it as well as the technical infrastructure required to underpin robust reproducibility of the outputs. We highlight some of the applications of estimates to date, how these were communicated and what their effect were. Finally, we explore some of the lessons learnt and remaining challenges for estimating the impact of vaccines and forming effective modelling consortia then discuss how this may be addressed in the second phase of VIMC. Modelled estimates are not a replacement for surveillance; however, they can examine theoretical counterfactuals and highlight data gaps to complement other activities. VIMC has implemented strategies to produce robust, standardised estimates of immunisation impact. But through the first phase of the consortium, critical lessons have been learnt both on the technical infrastructure and the effective engagement with modellers and stakeholders. To be successful, a productive dialogue with estimate consumers, producers and stakeholders needs to be underpinned by a rigorous and transparent analytical framework as well as an approach for building expertise in the short and long term.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"97\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467163/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gates Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15556.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.15556.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

估算免疫接种对全球健康的影响对于量化历史效益以及规划未来投资和战略非常重要。疫苗影响建模联盟(VIMC)成立于 2016 年,旨在为免疫接种的健康影响提供可靠的估算。在本文中,我们将考察该联盟的第一个五年阶段。我们详细介绍了如何定义疫苗影响、估算疫苗影响所使用的方法,以及为支持产出的稳健可重复性所需的技术基础设施。我们重点介绍了迄今为止估算结果的一些应用情况,以及这些结果的传播方式和效果。最后,我们探讨了在估算疫苗影响和组建有效建模联盟方面的一些经验教训和仍然存在的挑战,然后讨论了如何在 VIMC 的第二阶段解决这些问题。建模估算不能取代监测;但是,建模估算可以检查理论上的反事实,并突出数据缺口,以补充其他活动。VIMC 已经实施了一些战略,对免疫接种的影响进行可靠的、标准化的估计。但通过联合体第一阶段的工作,我们在技术基础设施以及与建模者和利益相关者的有效接触方面都吸取了重要的经验教训。要想取得成功,与估算消费者、生产者和利益相关者进行富有成效的对话,需要有严格透明的分析框架以及短期和长期的专业知识建设方法作为支撑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimating the impact of vaccination: lessons learned in the first phase of the Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium.

Estimates of the global health impact of immunisation are important for quantifying historical benefits as well as planning future investments and strategy. The Vaccine Impact Modelling Consortium (VIMC) was established in 2016 to provide reliable estimates of the health impact of immunisation. In this article we examine the consortium in its first five-year phase. We detail how vaccine impact was defined and the methods used to estimate it as well as the technical infrastructure required to underpin robust reproducibility of the outputs. We highlight some of the applications of estimates to date, how these were communicated and what their effect were. Finally, we explore some of the lessons learnt and remaining challenges for estimating the impact of vaccines and forming effective modelling consortia then discuss how this may be addressed in the second phase of VIMC. Modelled estimates are not a replacement for surveillance; however, they can examine theoretical counterfactuals and highlight data gaps to complement other activities. VIMC has implemented strategies to produce robust, standardised estimates of immunisation impact. But through the first phase of the consortium, critical lessons have been learnt both on the technical infrastructure and the effective engagement with modellers and stakeholders. To be successful, a productive dialogue with estimate consumers, producers and stakeholders needs to be underpinned by a rigorous and transparent analytical framework as well as an approach for building expertise in the short and long term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信