采用、接受和使用决策支持工具,促进基层医疗机构及时开展癌症检查。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sophie Chima, Barbara Hunter, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Natalie Lumsden, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Jon Emery
{"title":"采用、接受和使用决策支持工具,促进基层医疗机构及时开展癌症检查。","authors":"Sophie Chima, Barbara Hunter, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Natalie Lumsden, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Jon Emery","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmae046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexities of diagnosing cancer in general practice has driven the development of quality improvement (QI) interventions, including clinical decision support (CDS) and auditing tools. Future Health Today (FHT) is a novel QI tool, consisting of CDS at the point-of-care, practice population-level auditing, recall, and the monitoring of QI activities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Explore the acceptability and usability of the FHT cancer module, which flags patients with abnormal test results that may be indicative of undiagnosed cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with general practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs), from practices participating in a randomized trial evaluating the appropriate follow-up of patients. Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) was used to analyse and interpret the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of practices reported not using the auditing and QI components of the tool, only the CDS which was delivered at the point-of-care. The tool was used primarily by GPs; GPNs did not perceive the clinical recommendations to be within their role. For the CDS, facilitators for use included a good workflow fit, ease of use, low time cost, importance, and perceived knowledge gain. Barriers for use of the CDS included accuracy, competing priorities, and the patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDS aligned with the clinical workflow of GPs, was considered non-disruptive to the consultation and easy to implement into usual care. By applying the CP-FIT theory, we were able to demonstrate the key drivers for GPs using the tool, and what limited the use by GPNs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":" ","pages":"1048-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11642683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adoption, acceptance, and use of a decision support tool to promote timely investigations for cancer in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Chima, Barbara Hunter, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Natalie Lumsden, Craig Nelson, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Jon Emery\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/fampra/cmae046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The complexities of diagnosing cancer in general practice has driven the development of quality improvement (QI) interventions, including clinical decision support (CDS) and auditing tools. Future Health Today (FHT) is a novel QI tool, consisting of CDS at the point-of-care, practice population-level auditing, recall, and the monitoring of QI activities.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Explore the acceptability and usability of the FHT cancer module, which flags patients with abnormal test results that may be indicative of undiagnosed cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Interviews were conducted with general practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs), from practices participating in a randomized trial evaluating the appropriate follow-up of patients. Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) was used to analyse and interpret the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of practices reported not using the auditing and QI components of the tool, only the CDS which was delivered at the point-of-care. The tool was used primarily by GPs; GPNs did not perceive the clinical recommendations to be within their role. For the CDS, facilitators for use included a good workflow fit, ease of use, low time cost, importance, and perceived knowledge gain. Barriers for use of the CDS included accuracy, competing priorities, and the patient population.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CDS aligned with the clinical workflow of GPs, was considered non-disruptive to the consultation and easy to implement into usual care. By applying the CP-FIT theory, we were able to demonstrate the key drivers for GPs using the tool, and what limited the use by GPNs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1048-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11642683/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae046\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmae046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:全科癌症诊断的复杂性推动了质量改进(QI)干预措施的发展,包括临床决策支持(CDS)和审计工具。未来健康今天(FHT)是一种新型 QI 工具,由护理点的 CDS、实践人群层面的审核、召回和 QI 活动的监控组成:探讨 FHT 癌症模块的可接受性和可用性,该模块可标记出检查结果异常的患者,这些异常结果可能表明患者患有未确诊的癌症:方法:对全科医生(GP)和全科护士(GPN)进行访谈,访谈对象是参与随机试验的全科医生和全科护士。采用临床表现反馈干预理论(CP-FIT)对数据进行分析和解释:结果:大多数医疗机构表示没有使用该工具中的审计和 QI 部分,只使用了在医疗点提供的 CDS。该工具主要由全科医生使用;全科护士认为临床建议不属于他们的职责范围。对于 CDS 而言,使用的促进因素包括工作流程的良好匹配性、易用性、低时间成本、重要性以及可感知的知识增益。使用 CDS 的障碍包括准确性、相互竞争的优先事项和患者群体:CDS 符合全科医生的临床工作流程,不影响咨询,易于在常规护理中实施。通过应用 CP-FIT 理论,我们能够证明全科医生使用该工具的关键驱动因素,以及限制全科护士使用该工具的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adoption, acceptance, and use of a decision support tool to promote timely investigations for cancer in primary care.

Background: The complexities of diagnosing cancer in general practice has driven the development of quality improvement (QI) interventions, including clinical decision support (CDS) and auditing tools. Future Health Today (FHT) is a novel QI tool, consisting of CDS at the point-of-care, practice population-level auditing, recall, and the monitoring of QI activities.

Objectives: Explore the acceptability and usability of the FHT cancer module, which flags patients with abnormal test results that may be indicative of undiagnosed cancer.

Methods: Interviews were conducted with general practitioners (GPs) and general practice nurses (GPNs), from practices participating in a randomized trial evaluating the appropriate follow-up of patients. Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory (CP-FIT) was used to analyse and interpret the data.

Results: The majority of practices reported not using the auditing and QI components of the tool, only the CDS which was delivered at the point-of-care. The tool was used primarily by GPs; GPNs did not perceive the clinical recommendations to be within their role. For the CDS, facilitators for use included a good workflow fit, ease of use, low time cost, importance, and perceived knowledge gain. Barriers for use of the CDS included accuracy, competing priorities, and the patient population.

Conclusions: The CDS aligned with the clinical workflow of GPs, was considered non-disruptive to the consultation and easy to implement into usual care. By applying the CP-FIT theory, we were able to demonstrate the key drivers for GPs using the tool, and what limited the use by GPNs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信