肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制与冠心病透析患者的死亡率:一项多中心观察研究的启示。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Enmin Xie, Shuoyan An, Yaxin Wu, Zixiang Ye, Xuecheng Zhao, Yike Li, Nan Shen, Yanxiang Gao, Jingang Zheng
{"title":"肾素-血管紧张素系统抑制与冠心病透析患者的死亡率:一项多中心观察研究的启示。","authors":"Enmin Xie, Shuoyan An, Yaxin Wu, Zixiang Ye, Xuecheng Zhao, Yike Li, Nan Shen, Yanxiang Gao, Jingang Zheng","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2024.2419915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are firmly established in the general population, their efficacy within patient undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2015 and June 2021, 1168 patients undergoing dialysis with CAD were assessed from 30 tertiary medical centers. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ACEI or ARB were prescribed to 518 patients (44.3%) upon discharge. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, 361 (30.9%) patients died, including 243 cardiovascular deaths. The use of ACEI or ARB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (25.3% vs 35.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (17.0% vs 23.8%; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.001). These findings remained consistent across IPTW and PSM analyses. Sensitivity analyses for ACEI and ARB use separately yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that among patients undergoing dialysis with CAD, ACEI or ARB use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renin-angiotensin system inhibition and mortality in patients undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease: insights from a multi-center observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Enmin Xie, Shuoyan An, Yaxin Wu, Zixiang Ye, Xuecheng Zhao, Yike Li, Nan Shen, Yanxiang Gao, Jingang Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17512433.2024.2419915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While the survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are firmly established in the general population, their efficacy within patient undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between January 2015 and June 2021, 1168 patients undergoing dialysis with CAD were assessed from 30 tertiary medical centers. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ACEI or ARB were prescribed to 518 patients (44.3%) upon discharge. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, 361 (30.9%) patients died, including 243 cardiovascular deaths. The use of ACEI or ARB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (25.3% vs 35.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.82, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (17.0% vs 23.8%; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, <i>p</i> = 0.001). These findings remained consistent across IPTW and PSM analyses. Sensitivity analyses for ACEI and ARB use separately yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that among patients undergoing dialysis with CAD, ACEI or ARB use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2419915\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2024.2419915","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)对普通人群的生存益处已得到证实,但它们对接受透析的冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者的疗效仍存在争议:2015年1月至2021年6月期间,30家三级医疗中心对1168名接受透析治疗的冠心病患者进行了评估。主要结果为全因死亡,次要结果为心血管死亡。为考虑组间差异,进行了逆概率治疗加权(IPTW)和倾向评分匹配(PSM):共有 518 名患者(44.3%)在出院时接受了 ACEI 或 ARB 治疗。中位随访 22.2 个月后,361 名患者(30.9%)死亡,其中 243 人死于心血管疾病。使用 ACEI 或 ARB 可显著降低全因风险(25.3% vs 35.4%,危险比 [HR] 0.65,95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.52-0.82,P = 0.001)。这些结果在IPTW和PSM分析中保持一致。对分别使用 ACEI 和 ARB 的敏感性分析也得出了相似的结果:我们的研究结果表明,在患有 CAD 的透析患者中,使用 ACEI 或 ARB 与较低的全因死亡和心血管死亡风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renin-angiotensin system inhibition and mortality in patients undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease: insights from a multi-center observational study.

Background: While the survival benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are firmly established in the general population, their efficacy within patient undergoing dialysis with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains controversial.

Methods: Between January 2015 and June 2021, 1168 patients undergoing dialysis with CAD were assessed from 30 tertiary medical centers. The primary outcome was all-cause death, and the secondary outcome was cardiovascular death. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and propensity score matching (PSM) were performed to account for between-group differences.

Results: Overall, ACEI or ARB were prescribed to 518 patients (44.3%) upon discharge. After a median follow-up of 22.2 months, 361 (30.9%) patients died, including 243 cardiovascular deaths. The use of ACEI or ARB was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause (25.3% vs 35.4%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.82, p < 0.001) and cardiovascular death (17.0% vs 23.8%; HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.83, p = 0.001). These findings remained consistent across IPTW and PSM analyses. Sensitivity analyses for ACEI and ARB use separately yielded similar results.

Conclusions: Our findings suggested that among patients undergoing dialysis with CAD, ACEI or ARB use was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信