自体移植后的 CD19/CD22 CAR-T 细胞鸡尾酒疗法是治疗复发/难治性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的优化策略。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Xiaoxi Zhou, Qiuxia Yu, Zigang Dai, Jue Wang, Chunrui Li, Liang Huang, Yicheng Zhang, Yang Cao
{"title":"自体移植后的 CD19/CD22 CAR-T 细胞鸡尾酒疗法是治疗复发/难治性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤的优化策略。","authors":"Xiaoxi Zhou, Qiuxia Yu, Zigang Dai, Jue Wang, Chunrui Li, Liang Huang, Yicheng Zhang, Yang Cao","doi":"10.1186/s40164-024-00538-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary and secondary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL, SCNSL) are associated with short survival and represent an unmet need, requiring novel effective strategies. We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of CD19/22 CAR-T-cell therapy following ASCT (ASCT + CAR-T group), CD19/22 CAR-T-cell cocktail therapy (CAR-T group) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT group) in treating R/R CNSL patients. Analysis of the differences in clinical characteristics among the three groups revealed that the median age in the CIT group was older than that in the ASCT + CAR-T group and CAR-T group, and the median number of prior lines of therapy in the CIT group was less than that in the other groups. Patients in the two CAR-T-therapy groups exhibited comparable incidences and severities of CRS and ICANS. Grade 4-5 CRS and ICANS were not observed in either CAR-T-cell therapy group. The incidence of Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity in the ASCT + CAR-T and CAR-T groups was greater than that in the CIT group. The ORR was 82.75% in the ASCT + CAR-T group, 60.00% in the CAR-T group and 58.83% in the CIT group. As of December 31, 2022, the median follow-up after therapy was 16.73 months (range, 0.67-42.00 months). The median durations of PFS and OS were not reached in the ASCT + CAR-T group. The median PFS in the CAR-T group was 4.72 months, and OS was not reached. In the CIT group, the median PFS and OS were 6.63 months and 16.77 months, respectively. The 2-year PFS rate of patients in the ASCT + CAR-T group (65.52%) was significantly greater than that of patients in the CAR-T group (30.00%, P = 0.0321) and CIT group (23.53%, P = 0.0043). Our results support the development of CAR-T-cell therapy for R/R CNSL. With the durability of remission and low toxicity, ASCT combined with CAR-T-cell therapy appears to be a more effective and safer treatment option for primary and secondary R/R CNS lymphoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":12180,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Hematology & Oncology","volume":"13 1","pages":"100"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471030/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CD19/CD22 CAR-T-cell cocktail therapy following autologous transplantation is an optimizing strategy for treating relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoxi Zhou, Qiuxia Yu, Zigang Dai, Jue Wang, Chunrui Li, Liang Huang, Yicheng Zhang, Yang Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40164-024-00538-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary and secondary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL, SCNSL) are associated with short survival and represent an unmet need, requiring novel effective strategies. We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of CD19/22 CAR-T-cell therapy following ASCT (ASCT + CAR-T group), CD19/22 CAR-T-cell cocktail therapy (CAR-T group) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT group) in treating R/R CNSL patients. Analysis of the differences in clinical characteristics among the three groups revealed that the median age in the CIT group was older than that in the ASCT + CAR-T group and CAR-T group, and the median number of prior lines of therapy in the CIT group was less than that in the other groups. Patients in the two CAR-T-therapy groups exhibited comparable incidences and severities of CRS and ICANS. Grade 4-5 CRS and ICANS were not observed in either CAR-T-cell therapy group. The incidence of Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity in the ASCT + CAR-T and CAR-T groups was greater than that in the CIT group. The ORR was 82.75% in the ASCT + CAR-T group, 60.00% in the CAR-T group and 58.83% in the CIT group. As of December 31, 2022, the median follow-up after therapy was 16.73 months (range, 0.67-42.00 months). The median durations of PFS and OS were not reached in the ASCT + CAR-T group. The median PFS in the CAR-T group was 4.72 months, and OS was not reached. In the CIT group, the median PFS and OS were 6.63 months and 16.77 months, respectively. The 2-year PFS rate of patients in the ASCT + CAR-T group (65.52%) was significantly greater than that of patients in the CAR-T group (30.00%, P = 0.0321) and CIT group (23.53%, P = 0.0043). Our results support the development of CAR-T-cell therapy for R/R CNSL. With the durability of remission and low toxicity, ASCT combined with CAR-T-cell therapy appears to be a more effective and safer treatment option for primary and secondary R/R CNS lymphoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12180,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Experimental Hematology & Oncology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471030/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Experimental Hematology & Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00538-y\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Hematology & Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40164-024-00538-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

复发性/难治性(R/R)原发性和继发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL、SCNSL)存活期短,是一种尚未满足的需求,需要新的有效策略。我们回顾性比较了 ASCT 后 CD19/22 CAR-T 细胞疗法(ASCT + CAR-T 组)、CD19/22 CAR-T 细胞鸡尾酒疗法(CAR-T 组)和化学免疫疗法(CIT 组)治疗 R/R 中枢神经系统淋巴瘤患者的安全性和有效性。对三组临床特征差异的分析表明,CIT组的中位年龄比ASCT + CAR-T组和CAR-T组大,CIT组的中位既往治疗次数比其他组少。两组 CAR-T 疗法患者的 CRS 和 ICANS 发生率和严重程度相当。CAR-T细胞治疗组和CIT组均未观察到4-5级CRS和ICANS。ASCT + CAR-T 组和 CAR-T 组的 3/4 级血液学毒性发生率高于 CIT 组。ASCT + CAR-T 组的 ORR 为 82.75%,CAR-T 组为 60.00%,CIT 组为 58.83%。截至2022年12月31日,治疗后的中位随访时间为16.73个月(0.67-42.00个月)。ASCT+CAR-T组的PFS和OS的中位持续时间未达标。CAR-T 组的中位 PFS 为 4.72 个月,OS 未达标。CIT组的中位生存期和OS分别为6.63个月和16.77个月。ASCT+CAR-T组患者的2年PFS率(65.52%)明显高于CAR-T组(30.00%,P=0.0321)和CIT组(23.53%,P=0.0043)。我们的研究结果支持针对R/R CNSL开发CAR-T细胞疗法。由于缓解持久且毒性低,ASCT联合CAR-T细胞疗法似乎是治疗原发性和继发性R/R CNS淋巴瘤更有效、更安全的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CD19/CD22 CAR-T-cell cocktail therapy following autologous transplantation is an optimizing strategy for treating relapsed/refractory central nervous system lymphoma.

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) primary and secondary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL, SCNSL) are associated with short survival and represent an unmet need, requiring novel effective strategies. We retrospectively compared the safety and efficacy of CD19/22 CAR-T-cell therapy following ASCT (ASCT + CAR-T group), CD19/22 CAR-T-cell cocktail therapy (CAR-T group) and chemoimmunotherapy (CIT group) in treating R/R CNSL patients. Analysis of the differences in clinical characteristics among the three groups revealed that the median age in the CIT group was older than that in the ASCT + CAR-T group and CAR-T group, and the median number of prior lines of therapy in the CIT group was less than that in the other groups. Patients in the two CAR-T-therapy groups exhibited comparable incidences and severities of CRS and ICANS. Grade 4-5 CRS and ICANS were not observed in either CAR-T-cell therapy group. The incidence of Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity in the ASCT + CAR-T and CAR-T groups was greater than that in the CIT group. The ORR was 82.75% in the ASCT + CAR-T group, 60.00% in the CAR-T group and 58.83% in the CIT group. As of December 31, 2022, the median follow-up after therapy was 16.73 months (range, 0.67-42.00 months). The median durations of PFS and OS were not reached in the ASCT + CAR-T group. The median PFS in the CAR-T group was 4.72 months, and OS was not reached. In the CIT group, the median PFS and OS were 6.63 months and 16.77 months, respectively. The 2-year PFS rate of patients in the ASCT + CAR-T group (65.52%) was significantly greater than that of patients in the CAR-T group (30.00%, P = 0.0321) and CIT group (23.53%, P = 0.0043). Our results support the development of CAR-T-cell therapy for R/R CNSL. With the durability of remission and low toxicity, ASCT combined with CAR-T-cell therapy appears to be a more effective and safer treatment option for primary and secondary R/R CNS lymphoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental Hematology & Oncology is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of hematology and oncology with an emphasis on preclinical, basic, patient-oriented and translational research. The journal acts as an international platform for sharing laboratory findings in these areas and makes a deliberate effort to publish clinical trials with 'negative' results and basic science studies with provocative findings. Experimental Hematology & Oncology publishes original work, hypothesis, commentaries and timely reviews. With open access and rapid turnaround time from submission to publication, the journal strives to be a hub for disseminating new knowledge and discussing controversial topics for both basic scientists and busy clinicians in the closely related fields of hematology and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信