利用 PMF 和 Monte-Carlo 模拟对大丰江流域的抗生素进行来源分配和生态风险评估。

IF 3.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Jinqiu Song, Rongle Xu, Denghui Li, Shuaifeng Jiang, MaoMao Cai, Jianhua Xiong
{"title":"利用 PMF 和 Monte-Carlo 模拟对大丰江流域的抗生素进行来源分配和生态风险评估。","authors":"Jinqiu Song, Rongle Xu, Denghui Li, Shuaifeng Jiang, MaoMao Cai, Jianhua Xiong","doi":"10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics, prevalent in aquatic ecosystems, pose a grave threat to human health and the ecological well-being. This paper performed a case study on Dafeng River Basin in southern China. Specifically, techniques including positive matrix factorization (PFM) and Monte-Carlo simulation were employed to comprehensively investigate the spatial variations, possible sources, and ecological risks of antibiotics in four groups: sulfonamides (SAs), macrolides (MLs), quinolones (QNs), and tetracyclines (TCs). The major findings were as follows: first, 43 and 39 antibiotics were detected in the surface water and sediments of the basin, respectively, where the respective total content were ND-490.08 ng/L and ND-144.34 μg/kg, and the QNs and TCs were the two dominating groups. Second, the highest antibiotic content in surface water (441.43 ng/L) was observed in the midstream area, whereas the highest concentration in sediments (68.41 μg/kg) was found in the upstream region. Third, the investigation identified five sources of antibiotics discharged to surface water: domestic sewage, agricultural drainage, livestock discharge, sewage treatment plants, and aquaculture; three sources were detected for antibiotics in sediments: aquaculture, sewage treatment plants, and livestock discharge. Fourth, QNs had a significantly higher ecological risk than the other three groups of antibiotics, and livestock discharge (31.4% contribution) and aquaculture (23.4% contribution) were the main sources of risks of antibiotic contamination in Dafeng River Basin. This study is expected to provide some reference for control and risk management of antibiotic pollution in Dafeng River Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"46 11","pages":"479"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of antibiotics in Dafeng River Basin using PMF and Monte-Carlo simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Jinqiu Song, Rongle Xu, Denghui Li, Shuaifeng Jiang, MaoMao Cai, Jianhua Xiong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antibiotics, prevalent in aquatic ecosystems, pose a grave threat to human health and the ecological well-being. This paper performed a case study on Dafeng River Basin in southern China. Specifically, techniques including positive matrix factorization (PFM) and Monte-Carlo simulation were employed to comprehensively investigate the spatial variations, possible sources, and ecological risks of antibiotics in four groups: sulfonamides (SAs), macrolides (MLs), quinolones (QNs), and tetracyclines (TCs). The major findings were as follows: first, 43 and 39 antibiotics were detected in the surface water and sediments of the basin, respectively, where the respective total content were ND-490.08 ng/L and ND-144.34 μg/kg, and the QNs and TCs were the two dominating groups. Second, the highest antibiotic content in surface water (441.43 ng/L) was observed in the midstream area, whereas the highest concentration in sediments (68.41 μg/kg) was found in the upstream region. Third, the investigation identified five sources of antibiotics discharged to surface water: domestic sewage, agricultural drainage, livestock discharge, sewage treatment plants, and aquaculture; three sources were detected for antibiotics in sediments: aquaculture, sewage treatment plants, and livestock discharge. Fourth, QNs had a significantly higher ecological risk than the other three groups of antibiotics, and livestock discharge (31.4% contribution) and aquaculture (23.4% contribution) were the main sources of risks of antibiotic contamination in Dafeng River Basin. This study is expected to provide some reference for control and risk management of antibiotic pollution in Dafeng River Basin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"volume\":\"46 11\",\"pages\":\"479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Geochemistry and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-024-02252-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水生生态系统中普遍存在的抗生素对人类健康和生态福祉构成严重威胁。本文对中国南方大丰江流域进行了案例研究。具体而言,采用正矩阵因式分解(PFM)和蒙特卡洛模拟(Monte-Carlo simulation)等技术,全面研究了磺胺类(SA)、大环内酯类(ML)、喹诺酮类(QN)和四环素类(TC)四类抗生素的空间变化、可能来源和生态风险。主要发现如下:第一,在流域地表水和沉积物中分别检测到 43 种和 39 种抗生素,总含量分别为 ND-490.08 纳克/升和 ND-144.34 微克/千克,QNs 和 TCs 是主要的两类抗生素。其次,地表水中抗生素含量最高(441.43 ng/L)的区域位于中游地区,而沉积物中抗生素含量最高(68.41 μg/kg)的区域位于上游地区。第三,调查确定了向地表水排放抗生素的五个来源:生活污水、农业排水、牲畜排放、污水处理厂和水产养殖;在沉积物中检测到抗生素的三个来源:水产养殖、污水处理厂和牲畜排放。第四,QNs 的生态风险明显高于其他三类抗生素,畜禽排放(31.4%)和水产养殖(23.4%)是大丰江流域抗生素污染的主要风险来源。本研究有望为大丰江流域抗生素污染的控制和风险管理提供一定的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of antibiotics in Dafeng River Basin using PMF and Monte-Carlo simulation.

Antibiotics, prevalent in aquatic ecosystems, pose a grave threat to human health and the ecological well-being. This paper performed a case study on Dafeng River Basin in southern China. Specifically, techniques including positive matrix factorization (PFM) and Monte-Carlo simulation were employed to comprehensively investigate the spatial variations, possible sources, and ecological risks of antibiotics in four groups: sulfonamides (SAs), macrolides (MLs), quinolones (QNs), and tetracyclines (TCs). The major findings were as follows: first, 43 and 39 antibiotics were detected in the surface water and sediments of the basin, respectively, where the respective total content were ND-490.08 ng/L and ND-144.34 μg/kg, and the QNs and TCs were the two dominating groups. Second, the highest antibiotic content in surface water (441.43 ng/L) was observed in the midstream area, whereas the highest concentration in sediments (68.41 μg/kg) was found in the upstream region. Third, the investigation identified five sources of antibiotics discharged to surface water: domestic sewage, agricultural drainage, livestock discharge, sewage treatment plants, and aquaculture; three sources were detected for antibiotics in sediments: aquaculture, sewage treatment plants, and livestock discharge. Fourth, QNs had a significantly higher ecological risk than the other three groups of antibiotics, and livestock discharge (31.4% contribution) and aquaculture (23.4% contribution) were the main sources of risks of antibiotic contamination in Dafeng River Basin. This study is expected to provide some reference for control and risk management of antibiotic pollution in Dafeng River Basin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people. Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes. The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信