制药研发中的定量系统毒理学建模:一项全行业调查和若干案例研究。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Kylie A Beattie, Meghna Verma, Richard J Brennan, Diana Clausznitzer, Valeriu Damian, Derek Leishman, Mary E Spilker, Britton Boras, Zhenhong Li, Elias Oziolor, Theodore R Rieger, Anna Sher
{"title":"制药研发中的定量系统毒理学建模:一项全行业调查和若干案例研究。","authors":"Kylie A Beattie, Meghna Verma, Richard J Brennan, Diana Clausznitzer, Valeriu Damian, Derek Leishman, Mary E Spilker, Britton Boras, Zhenhong Li, Elias Oziolor, Theodore R Rieger, Anna Sher","doi":"10.1002/psp4.13227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).</p>","PeriodicalId":10774,"journal":{"name":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative systems toxicology modeling in pharmaceutical research and development: An industry-wide survey and selected case study examples.\",\"authors\":\"Kylie A Beattie, Meghna Verma, Richard J Brennan, Diana Clausznitzer, Valeriu Damian, Derek Leishman, Mary E Spilker, Britton Boras, Zhenhong Li, Elias Oziolor, Theodore R Rieger, Anna Sher\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp4.13227\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13227\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPT: Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp4.13227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

定量系统毒理学(QST)模型越来越多地被用于预测和了解药物研发中的毒性责任。欧洲制药工业和协会联合会 (EFPIA) 在全欧洲范围内对 15 家公司进行了调查。调查结果显示了整个行业目前使用 QST 模型的情况。在员工人数超过 10,000 人的受访公司中,73% 的公司使用了 QST 模型。应用最多的 QST 模型是肝脏、心脏电生理学和骨髓/血液学。受访者表示对中枢神经系统 (CNS)、肾脏、肺部和皮肤的 QST 模型特别感兴趣。QST 模型用于支持药物开发临床前和临床阶段的决策。调查表明,对 QST 模型的需求很高,而资源限制则被认为是扩大使用和影响的共同障碍。增加对 QST 资源和培训的投资可能会加速其应用和影响。本文还讨论了 EFPIA 公司在决策中使用 QST 模型的案例研究。本文旨在:(i) 分享应用 QST 模型为药物发现和开发项目决策提供信息的行业经验和教训;(ii) 分享 QST 模型开发和验证过程中采用的方法,并将这些方法与文献中提出的建模最佳实践和框架建议进行比较。与这些建模框架相关的 QST 具体应用的讨论与最近提出的国际协调理事会 (ICH) 关于模型信息药物开发 (MIDD) 一般原则的 M15 指导原则相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative systems toxicology modeling in pharmaceutical research and development: An industry-wide survey and selected case study examples.

Quantitative systems toxicology (QST) models are increasingly being applied for predicting and understanding toxicity liabilities in pharmaceutical research and development. A European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA)-wide survey was completed by 15 companies. The results provide insights into the current use of QST models across the industry. 73% of responding companies with more than 10,000 employees utilize QST models. The most applied QST models are for liver, cardiac electrophysiology, and bone marrow/hematology. Responders indicated particular interest in QST models for the central nervous system (CNS), kidney, lung, and skin. QST models are used to support decisions in both preclinical and clinical stages of pharmaceutical development. The survey suggests high demand for QST models and resource limitations were indicated as a common obstacle to broader use and impact. Increased investment in QST resources and training may accelerate application and impact. Case studies of QST model use in decision-making within EFPIA companies are also discussed. This article aims to (i) share industry experience and learnings from applying QST models to inform decision-making in drug discovery and development programs, and (ii) share approaches taken during QST model development and validation and compare these with recommendations for modeling best practices and frameworks proposed in the literature. Discussion of QST-specific applications in relation to these modeling frameworks is relevant in the context of the recently proposed International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M15 guideline on general principles for Model-Informed Drug Development (MIDD).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
11.40%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信