{"title":"评估新生儿出生复苏期间心电图对心率评估的功效：一项前瞻性观察研究。","authors":"Kee Hyun Cho, Hyun Su Lee, Eun Sun Kim","doi":"10.15441/ceem.24.245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, <i>P</i><0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, <i>P</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Kee Hyun Cho, Hyun Su Lee, Eun Sun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.24.245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, <i>P</i><0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, <i>P</i>=0.039).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.24.245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的本研究旨在评估在高危新生儿复苏期间，心电图与脉搏血氧仪在检测心率（HR）方面的功效：方法：对高危分娩病例进行前瞻性观察研究，测量检测心率所需的时间。结果：对 41 名婴儿进行了分析：研究分析了 41 名婴儿，其中 11 名需要复苏。9 名婴儿出生时体重为 36 千克。心电图从放置到检测心率的时间明显快于 PO 检测时间[30（20-43.5）秒 vs. 125（100-175）秒，PP=0.039]：结论：与 PO 相比，ECG 能有效评估新生儿复苏期间的心率。结论：与 PO 相比，心电图能有效评估新生儿复苏过程中的心率，经常需要复苏的低胎龄婴儿可受益于附近标准心电图的心率评估。
Assessing the efficacy of electrocardiogram for heart rate evaluation during newborn resuscitation at birth: a prospective observational study.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of electrocardiogram (ECG) compared to pulse oximetry (PO) in detecting heart rate (HR) during high-risk newborn resuscitation.
Methods: A prospective observational study was performed with high-risk delivery cases to measure the time required for HR detection. A conventional PO and a standard ECG monitor were used for HR assessment.
Results: Forty-one infants were analyzed in the study, and 11 among them needed resuscitation. Nine were <32 gestational weeks (GA), 28 were 33-35 GA, and 4 were >36 GA at birth. ECG time for placement to HR detection was significantly faster than PO detection [30 (20-43.5) vs. 125 (100-175) seconds, P<0.001]. ECG time for placement to HR detection was the fastest in the infants below 32 GA at birth [19 (11.5-30) vs. 34.5 (25-44.25) vs. 39.5 (30-64.75) seconds, P=0.039).
Conclusion: ECG effectively evaluated HR during neonatal resuscitation compared to PO. Low gestational age infants who need resuscitation often may benefit in HR evaluation with nearby standard ECG.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
