患者和家属善后服务加强了直升机急救医疗服务与以前的患者和家属之间的互动。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stuart Plumbley, Sarita Taneja, Joanne Griggs, Andrew Al Rais, Leigh Curtis, Richard Lyon
{"title":"患者和家属善后服务加强了直升机急救医疗服务与以前的患者和家属之间的互动。","authors":"Stuart Plumbley, Sarita Taneja, Joanne Griggs, Andrew Al Rais, Leigh Curtis, Richard Lyon","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11720-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in the United Kingdom (UK) deliver enhanced care to high-acuity, critically ill and injured patients. To enable patients to meet the HEMS team who treated them, many services within the UK have developed or are in the process of developing a Patient and Family Aftercare Service (PFAS). This study aims to evaluate whether the introduction of PFAS mitigates anxiety associated with patient aftercare visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A service evaluation of anxiety in HEMS team members before and after patient aftercare visits were conducted. The study was carried out between 1 September 2023, and 31 October 2023, and patient visits were undertaken between March 2022 and July 2023. An electronic survey was distributed to the respondents who provided informed consent for participation. The survey comprised the validated generalised anxiety disorder anxiety scale (GAD-7) and five additional contextualised statements developed through the wider PFAS. Anonymised data were collected using REDCap, a secure electronic database and was analysed in R programming. Free-text comments were reported by content analysis, placed into themes, and discussed with a narrative to complement the quantitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 33 recipients, 25 completed the questionnaire. Between the pre- and post-aftercare visits, a statistically significant difference was found between scores for GAD-7 (0.004, p < 0.05) and contextualised statements (0.001, p < 0.05). In addition, six broad themes were identified through content analysis. These include the emotional impact of patient interaction, coping strategies and structural changes in the aftercare system, challenges in patient and family expectations, anxieties relating to operational commitments, memory and recall of the incident, and a positive impact on personal growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anxiety related to patient aftercare visits was reduced when measured before and after the patient visits. Following this service evaluation, we can hypothesise that within pre-hospital care, PFAS plays an important structural role. Future research should focus on affirming the correct tool to measure anxiety in multi-disciplinary teams and prospectively evaluating these methods collaboratively across multiple pre-hospital services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient and family aftercare enhance interactions between Helicopter Emergency Medicine Services and former patients and families.\",\"authors\":\"Stuart Plumbley, Sarita Taneja, Joanne Griggs, Andrew Al Rais, Leigh Curtis, Richard Lyon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-024-11720-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in the United Kingdom (UK) deliver enhanced care to high-acuity, critically ill and injured patients. To enable patients to meet the HEMS team who treated them, many services within the UK have developed or are in the process of developing a Patient and Family Aftercare Service (PFAS). This study aims to evaluate whether the introduction of PFAS mitigates anxiety associated with patient aftercare visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A service evaluation of anxiety in HEMS team members before and after patient aftercare visits were conducted. The study was carried out between 1 September 2023, and 31 October 2023, and patient visits were undertaken between March 2022 and July 2023. An electronic survey was distributed to the respondents who provided informed consent for participation. The survey comprised the validated generalised anxiety disorder anxiety scale (GAD-7) and five additional contextualised statements developed through the wider PFAS. Anonymised data were collected using REDCap, a secure electronic database and was analysed in R programming. Free-text comments were reported by content analysis, placed into themes, and discussed with a narrative to complement the quantitative analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 33 recipients, 25 completed the questionnaire. Between the pre- and post-aftercare visits, a statistically significant difference was found between scores for GAD-7 (0.004, p < 0.05) and contextualised statements (0.001, p < 0.05). In addition, six broad themes were identified through content analysis. These include the emotional impact of patient interaction, coping strategies and structural changes in the aftercare system, challenges in patient and family expectations, anxieties relating to operational commitments, memory and recall of the incident, and a positive impact on personal growth.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anxiety related to patient aftercare visits was reduced when measured before and after the patient visits. Following this service evaluation, we can hypothesise that within pre-hospital care, PFAS plays an important structural role. Future research should focus on affirming the correct tool to measure anxiety in multi-disciplinary teams and prospectively evaluating these methods collaboratively across multiple pre-hospital services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11481800/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11720-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11720-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:英国的直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)为高危、危重病人和伤员提供更好的医疗服务。为了让患者能够见到为他们提供治疗的直升机急救医疗服务团队,英国的许多服务机构已经或正在开发患者及家属善后服务(PFAS)。本研究旨在评估 PFAS 的引入是否减轻了与患者术后护理探视相关的焦虑:方法:对患者术后护理探视前后急救小组成员的焦虑情绪进行服务评估。研究在 2023 年 9 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 31 日期间进行,患者探访在 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 7 月期间进行。研究人员向知情同意参与研究的受访者发放了一份电子调查问卷。调查内容包括经过验证的广泛性焦虑症焦虑量表(GAD-7)和通过更广泛的 PFAS 开发的五个额外的情景化陈述。匿名数据通过安全电子数据库 REDCap 收集,并通过 R 编程进行分析。通过内容分析报告自由文本评论,将其归入主题,并以叙述的方式进行讨论,以补充定量分析:在 33 名受助者中,25 人完成了问卷调查。在病人就诊前和就诊后进行测量,与病人就诊后护理相关的焦虑有所减轻。根据这项服务评估,我们可以假设,在院前护理中,PFAS 发挥着重要的结构性作用。未来的研究应侧重于确认在多学科团队中测量焦虑的正确工具,并在多个院前服务机构中合作对这些方法进行前瞻性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient and family aftercare enhance interactions between Helicopter Emergency Medicine Services and former patients and families.

Background: Helicopter Emergency Medical Services (HEMS) in the United Kingdom (UK) deliver enhanced care to high-acuity, critically ill and injured patients. To enable patients to meet the HEMS team who treated them, many services within the UK have developed or are in the process of developing a Patient and Family Aftercare Service (PFAS). This study aims to evaluate whether the introduction of PFAS mitigates anxiety associated with patient aftercare visits.

Methods: A service evaluation of anxiety in HEMS team members before and after patient aftercare visits were conducted. The study was carried out between 1 September 2023, and 31 October 2023, and patient visits were undertaken between March 2022 and July 2023. An electronic survey was distributed to the respondents who provided informed consent for participation. The survey comprised the validated generalised anxiety disorder anxiety scale (GAD-7) and five additional contextualised statements developed through the wider PFAS. Anonymised data were collected using REDCap, a secure electronic database and was analysed in R programming. Free-text comments were reported by content analysis, placed into themes, and discussed with a narrative to complement the quantitative analysis.

Results: Of the 33 recipients, 25 completed the questionnaire. Between the pre- and post-aftercare visits, a statistically significant difference was found between scores for GAD-7 (0.004, p < 0.05) and contextualised statements (0.001, p < 0.05). In addition, six broad themes were identified through content analysis. These include the emotional impact of patient interaction, coping strategies and structural changes in the aftercare system, challenges in patient and family expectations, anxieties relating to operational commitments, memory and recall of the incident, and a positive impact on personal growth.

Conclusion: Anxiety related to patient aftercare visits was reduced when measured before and after the patient visits. Following this service evaluation, we can hypothesise that within pre-hospital care, PFAS plays an important structural role. Future research should focus on affirming the correct tool to measure anxiety in multi-disciplinary teams and prospectively evaluating these methods collaboratively across multiple pre-hospital services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信