Mariam A Kidwani, Hasnaa Osama, Ahmed Hassan, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim
{"title":"喷托非利兰对紫杉醇诱发的乳腺癌患者神经病变的预防作用:随机对照试验。","authors":"Mariam A Kidwani, Hasnaa Osama, Ahmed Hassan, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim","doi":"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant clinical concern for which no approved treatment is currently available. The purpose of this trial was to investigate the neuro-prophylactic impact of pentoxifylline against paclitaxel-induced PN in patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). BC patients who were assigned to paclitaxel chemotherapy were randomly allocated to pentoxifylline or a control group for 12 weeks. The main outcomes included the assessment of PN incidence according to the defined Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, quality of life (QoL) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTx) scale, and neuropathic pain using the scale of self-reported Leeds Assessment for Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS). The code of the clinical trial registration is NCT06562998. The current study included a total of 72 patients allocated into pentoxifylline arm (n = 35) and placebo arm (n = 37). By the 12th week, the prevalence of PN (grade 2 or 3) was significantly lower in the pentoxifylline arm 10/35 (28.6%) compared to 24/37 (64.9%) of the controls (P value = 0.016). The total FACT/GOG-NTx score indicated a considerably worse QoL in the control group [98.18 (10.2) vs. 81.43 (14.8) for pentoxifylline and the control group, respectively, P < 0.001] with a mean difference of -16.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): -23.97 to -9.53]. S-LANSS scale showed significantly higher scores after 6 weeks [13.72 (5.86) vs. 17.52 (3.16), P = 0.002] and 12 weeks [17.84 (4.25) vs. 23.80 (1.00), P < 0.001] for pentoxifylline and control group, respectively. In conclusion, the use of pentoxifylline showed a significant reduction in paclitaxel-induced PN, which improved their QoL.</p>","PeriodicalId":7969,"journal":{"name":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prophylactic role of pentoxifylline against paclitaxel-induced neuropathy among patients with breast cancer: a randomized-controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mariam A Kidwani, Hasnaa Osama, Ahmed Hassan, Mohamed E A Abdelrahim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CAD.0000000000001666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant clinical concern for which no approved treatment is currently available. The purpose of this trial was to investigate the neuro-prophylactic impact of pentoxifylline against paclitaxel-induced PN in patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). BC patients who were assigned to paclitaxel chemotherapy were randomly allocated to pentoxifylline or a control group for 12 weeks. The main outcomes included the assessment of PN incidence according to the defined Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, quality of life (QoL) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTx) scale, and neuropathic pain using the scale of self-reported Leeds Assessment for Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS). The code of the clinical trial registration is NCT06562998. The current study included a total of 72 patients allocated into pentoxifylline arm (n = 35) and placebo arm (n = 37). By the 12th week, the prevalence of PN (grade 2 or 3) was significantly lower in the pentoxifylline arm 10/35 (28.6%) compared to 24/37 (64.9%) of the controls (P value = 0.016). The total FACT/GOG-NTx score indicated a considerably worse QoL in the control group [98.18 (10.2) vs. 81.43 (14.8) for pentoxifylline and the control group, respectively, P < 0.001] with a mean difference of -16.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): -23.97 to -9.53]. S-LANSS scale showed significantly higher scores after 6 weeks [13.72 (5.86) vs. 17.52 (3.16), P = 0.002] and 12 weeks [17.84 (4.25) vs. 23.80 (1.00), P < 0.001] for pentoxifylline and control group, respectively. In conclusion, the use of pentoxifylline showed a significant reduction in paclitaxel-induced PN, which improved their QoL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anti-Cancer Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anti-Cancer Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001666\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anti-Cancer Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001666","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prophylactic role of pentoxifylline against paclitaxel-induced neuropathy among patients with breast cancer: a randomized-controlled trial.
Paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a significant clinical concern for which no approved treatment is currently available. The purpose of this trial was to investigate the neuro-prophylactic impact of pentoxifylline against paclitaxel-induced PN in patients diagnosed with breast cancer (BC). BC patients who were assigned to paclitaxel chemotherapy were randomly allocated to pentoxifylline or a control group for 12 weeks. The main outcomes included the assessment of PN incidence according to the defined Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, quality of life (QoL) using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-NTx) scale, and neuropathic pain using the scale of self-reported Leeds Assessment for Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (s-LANSS). The code of the clinical trial registration is NCT06562998. The current study included a total of 72 patients allocated into pentoxifylline arm (n = 35) and placebo arm (n = 37). By the 12th week, the prevalence of PN (grade 2 or 3) was significantly lower in the pentoxifylline arm 10/35 (28.6%) compared to 24/37 (64.9%) of the controls (P value = 0.016). The total FACT/GOG-NTx score indicated a considerably worse QoL in the control group [98.18 (10.2) vs. 81.43 (14.8) for pentoxifylline and the control group, respectively, P < 0.001] with a mean difference of -16.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): -23.97 to -9.53]. S-LANSS scale showed significantly higher scores after 6 weeks [13.72 (5.86) vs. 17.52 (3.16), P = 0.002] and 12 weeks [17.84 (4.25) vs. 23.80 (1.00), P < 0.001] for pentoxifylline and control group, respectively. In conclusion, the use of pentoxifylline showed a significant reduction in paclitaxel-induced PN, which improved their QoL.
期刊介绍:
Anti-Cancer Drugs reports both clinical and experimental results related to anti-cancer drugs, and welcomes contributions on anti-cancer drug design, drug delivery, pharmacology, hormonal and biological modalities and chemotherapy evaluation. An internationally refereed journal devoted to the fast publication of innovative investigations on therapeutic agents against cancer, Anti-Cancer Drugs aims to stimulate and report research on both toxic and non-toxic anti-cancer agents. Consequently, the scope on the journal will cover both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and hormonal or biological response modalities such as interleukins and immunotherapy. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool.