1 型和 2 型糖尿病孕妇对持续葡萄糖监测的满意度。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kevin Shrestha, Ashley N Battarbee
{"title":"1 型和 2 型糖尿病孕妇对持续葡萄糖监测的满意度。","authors":"Kevin Shrestha, Ashley N Battarbee","doi":"10.1055/a-2442-7090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Given rapid uptake of CGM in pregnancies complicated by both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, our objective was to determine if CGM satisfaction and use differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Cross-sectional survey study of 100 patients with pregestational diabetes who used Dexcom G6 CGM during pregnancy and received prenatal care at a single tertiary care center. Participants completed the validated 15-question Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) and other questions about CGM use. The primary outcome was high satisfaction with CGM, defined as total GMSS score of 4 or greater. Secondary outcomes included GMSS subscales, frequency of CGM app use, and CGM features used. Outcomes were compared between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and logistic and ordinal regression estimated the association between type 2 diabetes and outcomes. Of 100 surveyed patients, 45 had type 1 and 55 had type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to use CGM before pregnancy and use insulin pump. CGM satisfaction did not differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (74.5% vs 56.6%; aOR 0.54, 95%CI 0.21-1.36; Fig). High openness, low behavioral burden, low emotional burden, and high worthwhileness also did not differ between groups after adjustment for CGM use before pregnancy. Reported CGM app use was high and did not differ between groups. Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to use arrows and/or graphs on CGM app compared to type 1 diabetes. In this cohort, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to be similarly satisfied with CGM compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Future efforts focused on CGM education for new users may help increase use of CGM app features, maximize satisfaction and minimize technology burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Shrestha, Ashley N Battarbee\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2442-7090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Given rapid uptake of CGM in pregnancies complicated by both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, our objective was to determine if CGM satisfaction and use differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Cross-sectional survey study of 100 patients with pregestational diabetes who used Dexcom G6 CGM during pregnancy and received prenatal care at a single tertiary care center. Participants completed the validated 15-question Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) and other questions about CGM use. The primary outcome was high satisfaction with CGM, defined as total GMSS score of 4 or greater. Secondary outcomes included GMSS subscales, frequency of CGM app use, and CGM features used. Outcomes were compared between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and logistic and ordinal regression estimated the association between type 2 diabetes and outcomes. Of 100 surveyed patients, 45 had type 1 and 55 had type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to use CGM before pregnancy and use insulin pump. CGM satisfaction did not differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (74.5% vs 56.6%; aOR 0.54, 95%CI 0.21-1.36; Fig). High openness, low behavioral burden, low emotional burden, and high worthwhileness also did not differ between groups after adjustment for CGM use before pregnancy. Reported CGM app use was high and did not differ between groups. Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to use arrows and/or graphs on CGM app compared to type 1 diabetes. In this cohort, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to be similarly satisfied with CGM compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Future efforts focused on CGM education for new users may help increase use of CGM app features, maximize satisfaction and minimize technology burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2442-7090\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2442-7090","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

连续血糖监测(CGM)可改善 1 型糖尿病患者的妊娠结局。我们的目标是确定 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者对 CGM 的满意度和使用情况是否存在差异。这项横断面调查研究的对象是 100 名妊娠糖尿病患者,他们在怀孕期间使用 Dexcom G6 CGM,并在一家三级医疗中心接受产前护理。参与者完成了经过验证的 15 个问题的血糖监测满意度调查(GMSS)和其他有关 CGM 使用的问题。主要结果是对 CGM 的满意度高,即 GMSS 总分达到或超过 4 分。次要结果包括 GMSS 分量表、CGM 应用程序使用频率和使用的 CGM 功能。结果在 1 型糖尿病和 2 型糖尿病之间进行了比较,并通过逻辑回归和序数回归估计了 2 型糖尿病与结果之间的关联。在接受调查的 100 名患者中,45 人患有 1 型糖尿病,55 人患有 2 型糖尿病。1 型糖尿病患者更有可能在怀孕前使用 CGM 和使用胰岛素泵。1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者对 CGM 的满意度没有差异(74.5% vs 56.6%;aOR 0.54,95%CI 0.21-1.36;图)。在对怀孕前使用 CGM 的情况进行调整后,高开放性、低行为负担、低情感负担和高值得信赖性在各组之间也没有差异。报告的 CGM 应用程序使用率较高,且组间无差异。与 1 型糖尿病患者相比,2 型糖尿病患者不太可能在 CGM 应用程序上使用箭头和/或图表。与 1 型糖尿病患者相比,2 型糖尿病患者似乎对 CGM 的满意度相似。今后,对新用户进行 CGM 教育可能有助于提高 CGM 应用程序功能的使用率,最大限度地提高满意度并减轻技术负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Satisfaction with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregnant Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves pregnancy outcomes in type 1 diabetes. Given rapid uptake of CGM in pregnancies complicated by both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, our objective was to determine if CGM satisfaction and use differed between type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Cross-sectional survey study of 100 patients with pregestational diabetes who used Dexcom G6 CGM during pregnancy and received prenatal care at a single tertiary care center. Participants completed the validated 15-question Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) and other questions about CGM use. The primary outcome was high satisfaction with CGM, defined as total GMSS score of 4 or greater. Secondary outcomes included GMSS subscales, frequency of CGM app use, and CGM features used. Outcomes were compared between type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and logistic and ordinal regression estimated the association between type 2 diabetes and outcomes. Of 100 surveyed patients, 45 had type 1 and 55 had type 2 diabetes. Patients with type 1 diabetes were more likely to use CGM before pregnancy and use insulin pump. CGM satisfaction did not differ between type 1 and type 2 diabetes (74.5% vs 56.6%; aOR 0.54, 95%CI 0.21-1.36; Fig). High openness, low behavioral burden, low emotional burden, and high worthwhileness also did not differ between groups after adjustment for CGM use before pregnancy. Reported CGM app use was high and did not differ between groups. Patients with type 2 diabetes were less likely to use arrows and/or graphs on CGM app compared to type 1 diabetes. In this cohort, patients with type 2 diabetes appear to be similarly satisfied with CGM compared to those with type 1 diabetes. Future efforts focused on CGM education for new users may help increase use of CGM app features, maximize satisfaction and minimize technology burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信