利用 MarketScan 数据评估药剂师服务中当前程序术语代码的使用情况。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Smita Rawal, Jianing Xu, Xianyan Chen, Daniel B Hall, Lazara Cabrera Ricabal, Henry N Young, Joshua Caballero
{"title":"利用 MarketScan 数据评估药剂师服务中当前程序术语代码的使用情况。","authors":"Smita Rawal, Jianing Xu, Xianyan Chen, Daniel B Hall, Lazara Cabrera Ricabal, Henry N Young, Joshua Caballero","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services affirmation enabled pharmacists to use Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for documentation and billing of clinical services. Despite legislative support and potential availability of pharmacists' clinical services, a gap may exist between the reported availability and actual prevalence of these services in real-world settings. The objective was to assess the prevalence of selected CPT codes (99605-99607, 98966-989968, and 99211-99215) in documenting and billing potential pharmacists' clinical services using recent available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilized the Merative MarketScan Medicare database from the period January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The dataset included deidentified patient information and CPT codes. Patients with CPT codes for face-to-face medication therapy management (MTM) services (99605-99607), codes for telephonic assessment and management (A/M) services (98966-98968), and/or codes for evaluation and management (E/M) services (99211-99215) were identified from outpatient claims. Descriptive statistics, including prevalence rates, were calculated. This study was approved by an institutional review board and followed STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were claims data for 2,784,629 enrollees from 2016 through 2020. Prevalence rates varied during this period, with lower rates for MTM face-to-face CPT codes (0.06%) and telephonic A/M codes (0.58%), while E/M CPT codes showed higher prevalence rates (87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings exhibited a limited adoption rate for MTM CPT codes for billing pharmacists' clinical services. Future research may focus on assessing pharmacists' perceptions and identifying facilitators and barriers to using CPT codes in billing clinical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"e431-e437"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the utilization of Current Procedural Terminology codes in pharmacists' services using MarketScan data.\",\"authors\":\"Smita Rawal, Jianing Xu, Xianyan Chen, Daniel B Hall, Lazara Cabrera Ricabal, Henry N Young, Joshua Caballero\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services affirmation enabled pharmacists to use Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for documentation and billing of clinical services. Despite legislative support and potential availability of pharmacists' clinical services, a gap may exist between the reported availability and actual prevalence of these services in real-world settings. The objective was to assess the prevalence of selected CPT codes (99605-99607, 98966-989968, and 99211-99215) in documenting and billing potential pharmacists' clinical services using recent available data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study utilized the Merative MarketScan Medicare database from the period January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The dataset included deidentified patient information and CPT codes. Patients with CPT codes for face-to-face medication therapy management (MTM) services (99605-99607), codes for telephonic assessment and management (A/M) services (98966-98968), and/or codes for evaluation and management (E/M) services (99211-99215) were identified from outpatient claims. Descriptive statistics, including prevalence rates, were calculated. This study was approved by an institutional review board and followed STROBE guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were claims data for 2,784,629 enrollees from 2016 through 2020. Prevalence rates varied during this period, with lower rates for MTM face-to-face CPT codes (0.06%) and telephonic A/M codes (0.58%), while E/M CPT codes showed higher prevalence rates (87%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study findings exhibited a limited adoption rate for MTM CPT codes for billing pharmacists' clinical services. Future research may focus on assessing pharmacists' perceptions and identifying facilitators and barriers to using CPT codes in billing clinical services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e431-e437\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:《医疗保险处方药、改进和现代化法案》(Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act)和医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)的批准,使药剂师能够使用当前程序术语(CPT)代码记录和结算临床服务。尽管药剂师的临床服务得到了立法支持并有可能提供,但在现实环境中,这些服务的报告可用性和实际普及率之间可能存在差距。本研究的目的是利用最近的可用数据评估选定 CPT 代码(99605-99607、98966-989968 和 99211-99215)在记录和结算潜在药剂师临床服务中的普及率:这项回顾性研究使用的是 Merative MarketScan 医疗保险数据库,时间跨度为 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日。数据集包括去标识化的患者信息和 CPT 代码。从门诊报销单中确定了具有面对面药物治疗管理 (MTM) 服务 CPT 代码(99605-99607)、电话评估和管理 (A/M) 服务代码(98966-98968)和/或评估和管理 (E/M) 服务代码(99211-99215)的患者。计算了包括患病率在内的描述性统计数字。本研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准,并遵循了 STROBE 指南:从 2016 年到 2020 年,共有 2,784,629 名参保者的理赔数据。在此期间,流行率各不相同,MTM 面对面 CPT 代码(0.06%)和电话 A/M 代码(0.58%)的流行率较低,而 E/M CPT 代码的流行率较高(87%):研究结果表明,采用 MTM CPT 代码为药剂师临床服务计费的比例有限。今后的研究可侧重于评估药剂师的看法,并确定在临床服务计费中使用 CPT 代码的促进因素和障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the utilization of Current Procedural Terminology codes in pharmacists' services using MarketScan data.

Purpose: The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services affirmation enabled pharmacists to use Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for documentation and billing of clinical services. Despite legislative support and potential availability of pharmacists' clinical services, a gap may exist between the reported availability and actual prevalence of these services in real-world settings. The objective was to assess the prevalence of selected CPT codes (99605-99607, 98966-989968, and 99211-99215) in documenting and billing potential pharmacists' clinical services using recent available data.

Methods: This retrospective study utilized the Merative MarketScan Medicare database from the period January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2020. The dataset included deidentified patient information and CPT codes. Patients with CPT codes for face-to-face medication therapy management (MTM) services (99605-99607), codes for telephonic assessment and management (A/M) services (98966-98968), and/or codes for evaluation and management (E/M) services (99211-99215) were identified from outpatient claims. Descriptive statistics, including prevalence rates, were calculated. This study was approved by an institutional review board and followed STROBE guidelines.

Results: There were claims data for 2,784,629 enrollees from 2016 through 2020. Prevalence rates varied during this period, with lower rates for MTM face-to-face CPT codes (0.06%) and telephonic A/M codes (0.58%), while E/M CPT codes showed higher prevalence rates (87%).

Conclusion: Study findings exhibited a limited adoption rate for MTM CPT codes for billing pharmacists' clinical services. Future research may focus on assessing pharmacists' perceptions and identifying facilitators and barriers to using CPT codes in billing clinical services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信