{"title":"基于机器学习的大鼠和人类细胞色素 P450s 化学物质抑制活性硅学预测。","authors":"Kaori Ambe, Mizuki Nakamori, Riku Tohno, Kotaro Suzuki, Takamitsu Sasaki, Masahiro Tohkin, Kouichi Yoshinari","doi":"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The prediction of cytochrome P450 inhibition by a computational (quantitative) structure-activity relationship approach using chemical structure information and machine learning would be useful for toxicity research as a simple and rapid <i>in silico</i> tool. However, there are few <i>in silico</i> models focusing on the species differences between rat and human in the P450s inhibition. This study aimed to establish <i>in silico</i> models to classify chemical substances as inhibitors or non-inhibitors of various rat and human P450s, using only molecular descriptors. Using the in-house test results from our <i>in vitro</i> experiments, we used 326 substances for model construction and internal validation data. Apart from the 326 substances, 60 substances were used as external validation data set. We focused on seven rat P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B1, CYP2C6, CYP2D1, CYP2E1, and CYP3A2) and 11 human P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4). Most of the models established using XGBoost showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8 or more in the internal validation. When we set an applicability domain for the models and confirmed their generalization performance through external validation, most of the models showed an ROC-AUC of 0.7 or more. Interestingly, for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, we discovered that a human P450 inhibitory activity model can predict rat P450 inhibitory activity and vice versa. These models are the first attempts to predict inhibitory activity against a wide variety of P450s in both rats and humans using chemical structure information. Our experimental results and <i>in silico</i> models would be helpful to support information for species similarities and differences in chemical-induced toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":31,"journal":{"name":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"1843-1850"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577419/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning-Based <i>In Silico</i> Prediction of the Inhibitory Activity of Chemical Substances Against Rat and Human Cytochrome P450s.\",\"authors\":\"Kaori Ambe, Mizuki Nakamori, Riku Tohno, Kotaro Suzuki, Takamitsu Sasaki, Masahiro Tohkin, Kouichi Yoshinari\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The prediction of cytochrome P450 inhibition by a computational (quantitative) structure-activity relationship approach using chemical structure information and machine learning would be useful for toxicity research as a simple and rapid <i>in silico</i> tool. However, there are few <i>in silico</i> models focusing on the species differences between rat and human in the P450s inhibition. This study aimed to establish <i>in silico</i> models to classify chemical substances as inhibitors or non-inhibitors of various rat and human P450s, using only molecular descriptors. Using the in-house test results from our <i>in vitro</i> experiments, we used 326 substances for model construction and internal validation data. Apart from the 326 substances, 60 substances were used as external validation data set. We focused on seven rat P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B1, CYP2C6, CYP2D1, CYP2E1, and CYP3A2) and 11 human P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4). Most of the models established using XGBoost showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8 or more in the internal validation. When we set an applicability domain for the models and confirmed their generalization performance through external validation, most of the models showed an ROC-AUC of 0.7 or more. Interestingly, for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, we discovered that a human P450 inhibitory activity model can predict rat P450 inhibitory activity and vice versa. These models are the first attempts to predict inhibitory activity against a wide variety of P450s in both rats and humans using chemical structure information. Our experimental results and <i>in silico</i> models would be helpful to support information for species similarities and differences in chemical-induced toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":31,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1843-1850\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577419/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemical Research in Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00168\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemical Research in Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.4c00168","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning-Based In Silico Prediction of the Inhibitory Activity of Chemical Substances Against Rat and Human Cytochrome P450s.
The prediction of cytochrome P450 inhibition by a computational (quantitative) structure-activity relationship approach using chemical structure information and machine learning would be useful for toxicity research as a simple and rapid in silico tool. However, there are few in silico models focusing on the species differences between rat and human in the P450s inhibition. This study aimed to establish in silico models to classify chemical substances as inhibitors or non-inhibitors of various rat and human P450s, using only molecular descriptors. Using the in-house test results from our in vitro experiments, we used 326 substances for model construction and internal validation data. Apart from the 326 substances, 60 substances were used as external validation data set. We focused on seven rat P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP2B1, CYP2C6, CYP2D1, CYP2E1, and CYP3A2) and 11 human P450s (CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP1B1, CYP2A6, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, and CYP3A4). Most of the models established using XGBoost showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.8 or more in the internal validation. When we set an applicability domain for the models and confirmed their generalization performance through external validation, most of the models showed an ROC-AUC of 0.7 or more. Interestingly, for CYP1A1 and CYP1A2, we discovered that a human P450 inhibitory activity model can predict rat P450 inhibitory activity and vice versa. These models are the first attempts to predict inhibitory activity against a wide variety of P450s in both rats and humans using chemical structure information. Our experimental results and in silico models would be helpful to support information for species similarities and differences in chemical-induced toxicity.
期刊介绍:
Chemical Research in Toxicology publishes Articles, Rapid Reports, Chemical Profiles, Reviews, Perspectives, Letters to the Editor, and ToxWatch on a wide range of topics in Toxicology that inform a chemical and molecular understanding and capacity to predict biological outcomes on the basis of structures and processes. The overarching goal of activities reported in the Journal are to provide knowledge and innovative approaches needed to promote intelligent solutions for human safety and ecosystem preservation. The journal emphasizes insight concerning mechanisms of toxicity over phenomenological observations. It upholds rigorous chemical, physical and mathematical standards for characterization and application of modern techniques.