作为生物废物综合管理新兴工具的多重标准分析:从食物废物预防到副产品利用的综述

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Mariana Hammerschmitt Ecco, Marcelo Seleme Matias, Armando Borges de Castilhos Junior
{"title":"作为生物废物综合管理新兴工具的多重标准分析:从食物废物预防到副产品利用的综述","authors":"Mariana Hammerschmitt Ecco,&nbsp;Marcelo Seleme Matias,&nbsp;Armando Borges de Castilhos Junior","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02087-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the variety of technologies available for the valorization of biowaste, this fraction of municipal solid waste is usually disposed of in landfills and dumpsites in undeveloped and developing countries. The selection of technological strategies compatible with the reality of each location represents an essential role in the success and continuity of the operation of the facilities. The best strategy will result from combining different environmental, economic, social, and technical dimensions, confronted with the interests of the stakeholders and the legal and policy contexts. Due to the complexity of different criteria, alternatives, and interests, a Multi-criteria Decision-making (MCDM) methodology is recommended to ensure the quality of the decision-making process. This study presents a systematic review of publications that have applied multi-criteria analysis as a decision support tool for the selection of biowaste management strategies. The different stages of management are discussed separately, highlighting the change in paradigms over time. It was found that less than a hundred studies have addressed it so far, with Asia contributing to most publications. However, the timeline shows that the number of publications is increasing, with multi-criteria models representing great potential to support decisions at any individual management stage, from preventing food waste to using by-products. Integrated multi-criteria approach that combines all stages of biowaste management, however, is still scarce in the literature.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":"26 6","pages":"3324 - 3340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-criteria analysis as an emerging tool for biowaste integrated management: a review from food waste prevention to by-products use\",\"authors\":\"Mariana Hammerschmitt Ecco,&nbsp;Marcelo Seleme Matias,&nbsp;Armando Borges de Castilhos Junior\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10163-024-02087-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the variety of technologies available for the valorization of biowaste, this fraction of municipal solid waste is usually disposed of in landfills and dumpsites in undeveloped and developing countries. The selection of technological strategies compatible with the reality of each location represents an essential role in the success and continuity of the operation of the facilities. The best strategy will result from combining different environmental, economic, social, and technical dimensions, confronted with the interests of the stakeholders and the legal and policy contexts. Due to the complexity of different criteria, alternatives, and interests, a Multi-criteria Decision-making (MCDM) methodology is recommended to ensure the quality of the decision-making process. This study presents a systematic review of publications that have applied multi-criteria analysis as a decision support tool for the selection of biowaste management strategies. The different stages of management are discussed separately, highlighting the change in paradigms over time. It was found that less than a hundred studies have addressed it so far, with Asia contributing to most publications. However, the timeline shows that the number of publications is increasing, with multi-criteria models representing great potential to support decisions at any individual management stage, from preventing food waste to using by-products. Integrated multi-criteria approach that combines all stages of biowaste management, however, is still scarce in the literature.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"3324 - 3340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02087-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02087-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管生物废物的价值化技术多种多样,但在不发达国家和发展中国家,这部分城市固体废物通常被丢弃在垃圾填埋场和垃圾堆放场。选择符合各地实际情况的技术战略对设施的成功和持续运行至关重要。最佳战略将结合不同的环境、经济、社会和技术层面,并考虑利益相关者的利益以及法律和政策背景。由于不同标准、备选方案和利益的复杂性,建议采用多标准决策(MCDM)方法,以确保决策过程的质量。本研究对应用多重标准分析作为决策支持工具来选择生物废物管理策略的出版物进行了系统回顾。研究分别讨论了不同的管理阶段,强调了随着时间推移范式的变化。研究发现,迄今为止只有不到 100 项研究涉及这一问题,其中亚洲的出版物最多。然而,时间轴显示,出版物的数量正在增加,多重标准模型具有巨大潜力,可支持从防止食物浪费到使用副产品等各个管理阶段的决策。然而,结合生物废物管理所有阶段的综合多标准方法在文献中仍然很少见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Multi-criteria analysis as an emerging tool for biowaste integrated management: a review from food waste prevention to by-products use

Multi-criteria analysis as an emerging tool for biowaste integrated management: a review from food waste prevention to by-products use

Despite the variety of technologies available for the valorization of biowaste, this fraction of municipal solid waste is usually disposed of in landfills and dumpsites in undeveloped and developing countries. The selection of technological strategies compatible with the reality of each location represents an essential role in the success and continuity of the operation of the facilities. The best strategy will result from combining different environmental, economic, social, and technical dimensions, confronted with the interests of the stakeholders and the legal and policy contexts. Due to the complexity of different criteria, alternatives, and interests, a Multi-criteria Decision-making (MCDM) methodology is recommended to ensure the quality of the decision-making process. This study presents a systematic review of publications that have applied multi-criteria analysis as a decision support tool for the selection of biowaste management strategies. The different stages of management are discussed separately, highlighting the change in paradigms over time. It was found that less than a hundred studies have addressed it so far, with Asia contributing to most publications. However, the timeline shows that the number of publications is increasing, with multi-criteria models representing great potential to support decisions at any individual management stage, from preventing food waste to using by-products. Integrated multi-criteria approach that combines all stages of biowaste management, however, is still scarce in the literature.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信