Petra Kleinbongard, Carlos Galán Arriola, Lina Badimon, Veronica Crisostomo, Zoltán Giricz, Mariann Gyöngyösi, Gerd Heusch, Borja Ibanez, Attila Kiss, Dominique P. V. de Kleijn, Bruno K. Podesser, Rafael Ramírez Carracedo, Antonio Rodríguez-Sinovas, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Francisco M. Sanchez Margallo, Gemma Vilahur, José Luis Zamorano, Carlos Zaragoza, Peter Ferdinandy, Derek J. Hausenloy
{"title":"改善心脏保护疗法的临床前评估(IMPACT):关于缺血预处理效果的多中心猪研究","authors":"Petra Kleinbongard, Carlos Galán Arriola, Lina Badimon, Veronica Crisostomo, Zoltán Giricz, Mariann Gyöngyösi, Gerd Heusch, Borja Ibanez, Attila Kiss, Dominique P. V. de Kleijn, Bruno K. Podesser, Rafael Ramírez Carracedo, Antonio Rodríguez-Sinovas, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Francisco M. Sanchez Margallo, Gemma Vilahur, José Luis Zamorano, Carlos Zaragoza, Peter Ferdinandy, Derek J. Hausenloy","doi":"10.1007/s00395-024-01083-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack of rigor and reproducibility in pre-clinical studies. To address this, we have established the European IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) pig AMI network with centralized randomization and blinded core laboratory IS analysis and validated the network with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a positive control. Ten sites in the COST Innovators Grant (IG16225) network participated in the IMPACT network. Three sites were excluded from the final analysis through quality control of infarct images and use of pre-defined exclusion criteria. Using a centrally generated randomization list, pigs were allocated to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R, <i>N</i> = 5/site) or IPC + I/R (<i>N</i> = 5/site). The primary endpoint was IS [% area-at-risk (AAR)], as quantified by triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining in a centralized, blinded core laboratory (5 sites), or IS [% left-ventricular mass (LV)], as quantified by a centralized, blinded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) core laboratory (2 sites). In pooled analyses, IPC significantly reduced IS when compared to I/R (57 ± 14 versus 32 ± 19 [%AAR] <i>N</i> = 25 pigs/group; <i>p</i> < 0.001; 25 ± 13 versus 14 ± 8 [%LV]; <i>N</i> = 10 pigs/group; <i>p</i> = 0.021). In site-specific analyses, in 4 of the 5 sites, IS was significantly reduced by IPC when compared to I/R when quantified by TTC and in 1 of 2 sites when quantified by CMR. A pig AMI multicenter European network with centralized randomization and core blinded IS analysis was established and validated with the aim to improve the reproducibility of cardioprotective interventions in pre-clinical studies and the translation of cardioprotection for patient benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8723,"journal":{"name":"Basic Research in Cardiology","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT): multicenter pig study on the effect of ischemic preconditioning\",\"authors\":\"Petra Kleinbongard, Carlos Galán Arriola, Lina Badimon, Veronica Crisostomo, Zoltán Giricz, Mariann Gyöngyösi, Gerd Heusch, Borja Ibanez, Attila Kiss, Dominique P. V. de Kleijn, Bruno K. Podesser, Rafael Ramírez Carracedo, Antonio Rodríguez-Sinovas, Marisol Ruiz-Meana, Francisco M. Sanchez Margallo, Gemma Vilahur, José Luis Zamorano, Carlos Zaragoza, Peter Ferdinandy, Derek J. Hausenloy\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00395-024-01083-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack of rigor and reproducibility in pre-clinical studies. To address this, we have established the European IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) pig AMI network with centralized randomization and blinded core laboratory IS analysis and validated the network with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a positive control. Ten sites in the COST Innovators Grant (IG16225) network participated in the IMPACT network. Three sites were excluded from the final analysis through quality control of infarct images and use of pre-defined exclusion criteria. Using a centrally generated randomization list, pigs were allocated to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R, <i>N</i> = 5/site) or IPC + I/R (<i>N</i> = 5/site). The primary endpoint was IS [% area-at-risk (AAR)], as quantified by triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining in a centralized, blinded core laboratory (5 sites), or IS [% left-ventricular mass (LV)], as quantified by a centralized, blinded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) core laboratory (2 sites). In pooled analyses, IPC significantly reduced IS when compared to I/R (57 ± 14 versus 32 ± 19 [%AAR] <i>N</i> = 25 pigs/group; <i>p</i> < 0.001; 25 ± 13 versus 14 ± 8 [%LV]; <i>N</i> = 10 pigs/group; <i>p</i> = 0.021). In site-specific analyses, in 4 of the 5 sites, IS was significantly reduced by IPC when compared to I/R when quantified by TTC and in 1 of 2 sites when quantified by CMR. A pig AMI multicenter European network with centralized randomization and core blinded IS analysis was established and validated with the aim to improve the reproducibility of cardioprotective interventions in pre-clinical studies and the translation of cardioprotection for patient benefit.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Basic Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Basic Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-024-01083-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Basic Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00395-024-01083-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT): multicenter pig study on the effect of ischemic preconditioning
Numerous cardioprotective interventions have been reported to reduce myocardial infarct size (IS) in pre-clinical studies. However, their translation for the benefit of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been largely disappointing. One reason for the lack of translation is the lack of rigor and reproducibility in pre-clinical studies. To address this, we have established the European IMproving Preclinical Assessment of Cardioprotective Therapies (IMPACT) pig AMI network with centralized randomization and blinded core laboratory IS analysis and validated the network with ischemic preconditioning (IPC) as a positive control. Ten sites in the COST Innovators Grant (IG16225) network participated in the IMPACT network. Three sites were excluded from the final analysis through quality control of infarct images and use of pre-defined exclusion criteria. Using a centrally generated randomization list, pigs were allocated to myocardial ischemia/reperfusion (I/R, N = 5/site) or IPC + I/R (N = 5/site). The primary endpoint was IS [% area-at-risk (AAR)], as quantified by triphenyl-tetrazolium-chloride (TTC) staining in a centralized, blinded core laboratory (5 sites), or IS [% left-ventricular mass (LV)], as quantified by a centralized, blinded cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) core laboratory (2 sites). In pooled analyses, IPC significantly reduced IS when compared to I/R (57 ± 14 versus 32 ± 19 [%AAR] N = 25 pigs/group; p < 0.001; 25 ± 13 versus 14 ± 8 [%LV]; N = 10 pigs/group; p = 0.021). In site-specific analyses, in 4 of the 5 sites, IS was significantly reduced by IPC when compared to I/R when quantified by TTC and in 1 of 2 sites when quantified by CMR. A pig AMI multicenter European network with centralized randomization and core blinded IS analysis was established and validated with the aim to improve the reproducibility of cardioprotective interventions in pre-clinical studies and the translation of cardioprotection for patient benefit.
期刊介绍:
Basic Research in Cardiology is an international journal for cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles related to experimental cardiology that meet its stringent scientific standards.
Basic Research in Cardiology regularly receives articles from the fields of
- Molecular and Cellular Biology
- Biochemistry
- Biophysics
- Pharmacology
- Physiology and Pathology
- Clinical Cardiology