{"title":"不进行刮宫的手术是否能有效治疗髋臼周围转移瘤?93 例患者生存研究的启示","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The main aim of this study was to analyse the 6-month survival rates in <em>peri</em>-acetabular metastasis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an acetabular cage and without curettage. The secondary objectives were to analyse the global survival rates, the factors influencing patient survival and to evaluate mechanical complication rates after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was carried out on a cohort of 93 consecutive patients who underwent THA with an acetabular cage without curettage for acetabular metastasis or multiple myeloma lesions between 2010 and 2020. The National Death Registry was consulted to obtain the exact date of death of the patients; the minimum follow-up time was 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 6-month survival rate for all types of cancer was 78 % [68 – 85], the 1-year survival rate was 66 % [55 – 74], and the 5-year survival rate was 26 % [17 – 36]. The median overall survival for the cohort was 24.37 months [16.10 – 32.63]. The mean overall survival was 46.02 months [32.89 – 59.16]. At last contact, 86 % of the operated patients were walking again.</div><div>No patient died from surgery. The ECOG performance status score, the number of bone metastatic sites, the presence of visceral metastases and the number of lines of systemic therapy undertaken prior to surgery were negative survival factors. Three patients (3.2 %) had early prosthetic dislocation, 2 patients (2.2 %) showed aseptic loosening of her partial hip implant after 10 and 11 years respectively and 4 patients (4.3 %) had an early infection treated by debridement, antibiotics and implant retention to control the infection. During the follow-up period, no new femoral metastases were detected in any patient.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgery without curettage is an effective treatment for periacetabular metastasis. It gives reliable results, regardless of the type of acetabular lesion, allowing most patients to walk again and does not modify the patient’s survival.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48806,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Bone Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is surgery without curettage effective for periacetabular Metastasis? Insights from a survival study of 93 patients\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbo.2024.100643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The main aim of this study was to analyse the 6-month survival rates in <em>peri</em>-acetabular metastasis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an acetabular cage and without curettage. The secondary objectives were to analyse the global survival rates, the factors influencing patient survival and to evaluate mechanical complication rates after THA.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study was carried out on a cohort of 93 consecutive patients who underwent THA with an acetabular cage without curettage for acetabular metastasis or multiple myeloma lesions between 2010 and 2020. The National Death Registry was consulted to obtain the exact date of death of the patients; the minimum follow-up time was 2 years.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The 6-month survival rate for all types of cancer was 78 % [68 – 85], the 1-year survival rate was 66 % [55 – 74], and the 5-year survival rate was 26 % [17 – 36]. The median overall survival for the cohort was 24.37 months [16.10 – 32.63]. The mean overall survival was 46.02 months [32.89 – 59.16]. At last contact, 86 % of the operated patients were walking again.</div><div>No patient died from surgery. The ECOG performance status score, the number of bone metastatic sites, the presence of visceral metastases and the number of lines of systemic therapy undertaken prior to surgery were negative survival factors. Three patients (3.2 %) had early prosthetic dislocation, 2 patients (2.2 %) showed aseptic loosening of her partial hip implant after 10 and 11 years respectively and 4 patients (4.3 %) had an early infection treated by debridement, antibiotics and implant retention to control the infection. During the follow-up period, no new femoral metastases were detected in any patient.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Surgery without curettage is an effective treatment for periacetabular metastasis. It gives reliable results, regardless of the type of acetabular lesion, allowing most patients to walk again and does not modify the patient’s survival.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Bone Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001234\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Bone Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212137424001234","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Is surgery without curettage effective for periacetabular Metastasis? Insights from a survival study of 93 patients
Background
The main aim of this study was to analyse the 6-month survival rates in peri-acetabular metastasis patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) with an acetabular cage and without curettage. The secondary objectives were to analyse the global survival rates, the factors influencing patient survival and to evaluate mechanical complication rates after THA.
Methods
This study was carried out on a cohort of 93 consecutive patients who underwent THA with an acetabular cage without curettage for acetabular metastasis or multiple myeloma lesions between 2010 and 2020. The National Death Registry was consulted to obtain the exact date of death of the patients; the minimum follow-up time was 2 years.
Results
The 6-month survival rate for all types of cancer was 78 % [68 – 85], the 1-year survival rate was 66 % [55 – 74], and the 5-year survival rate was 26 % [17 – 36]. The median overall survival for the cohort was 24.37 months [16.10 – 32.63]. The mean overall survival was 46.02 months [32.89 – 59.16]. At last contact, 86 % of the operated patients were walking again.
No patient died from surgery. The ECOG performance status score, the number of bone metastatic sites, the presence of visceral metastases and the number of lines of systemic therapy undertaken prior to surgery were negative survival factors. Three patients (3.2 %) had early prosthetic dislocation, 2 patients (2.2 %) showed aseptic loosening of her partial hip implant after 10 and 11 years respectively and 4 patients (4.3 %) had an early infection treated by debridement, antibiotics and implant retention to control the infection. During the follow-up period, no new femoral metastases were detected in any patient.
Conclusion
Surgery without curettage is an effective treatment for periacetabular metastasis. It gives reliable results, regardless of the type of acetabular lesion, allowing most patients to walk again and does not modify the patient’s survival.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Bone Oncology is a peer-reviewed international journal aimed at presenting basic, translational and clinical high-quality research related to bone and cancer.
As the first journal dedicated to cancer induced bone diseases, JBO welcomes original research articles, review articles, editorials and opinion pieces. Case reports will only be considered in exceptional circumstances and only when accompanied by a comprehensive review of the subject.
The areas covered by the journal include:
Bone metastases (pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnostics, clinical features, prevention, treatment)
Preclinical models of metastasis
Bone microenvironment in cancer (stem cell, bone cell and cancer interactions)
Bone targeted therapy (pharmacology, therapeutic targets, drug development, clinical trials, side-effects, outcome research, health economics)
Cancer treatment induced bone loss (epidemiology, pathophysiology, prevention and management)
Bone imaging (clinical and animal, skeletal interventional radiology)
Bone biomarkers (clinical and translational applications)
Radiotherapy and radio-isotopes
Skeletal complications
Bone pain (mechanisms and management)
Orthopaedic cancer surgery
Primary bone tumours
Clinical guidelines
Multidisciplinary care
Keywords: bisphosphonate, bone, breast cancer, cancer, CTIBL, denosumab, metastasis, myeloma, osteoblast, osteoclast, osteooncology, osteo-oncology, prostate cancer, skeleton, tumour.