Riccardo Ludovichetti , Tze Phei Kee , Taryn Rohringer , Karel G. Terbrugge , Timo Krings
{"title":"推测血栓形成、壁强化和灶周水肿的相互作用是脑动静脉畸形破裂的预测因素","authors":"Riccardo Ludovichetti , Tze Phei Kee , Taryn Rohringer , Karel G. Terbrugge , Timo Krings","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The presence of shear stress within intracranial AVMs (arteriovenous malformations) due to high flow, perinidal angiogenesis, intranidal aneurysms, and biological factors are presumed risk factors for rupture. However, emerging imaging and histological evidence suggests that risk factors for AVM rupture may extend beyond the classical understanding. The presence of perifocal edema at the time of rupture, luminal thrombosis, and vessel wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI elucidate the possibility of an underlying inflammatory process within AVMs, which may predispose them to instability and eventual rupture. We hypothesize that for some AVM ruptures, the occurrence of thrombosis within vascular outpouchings of the AVM initiates a cascade of events, including local hypoxia, inflammation, breakdown of the blood–brain barrier and wall matrix degradation, which is evident from the presence of perifocal edema and vessel wall enhancement observed on imaging. These changes might ultimately raise the risk of AVM rupture and subsequent hemorrhage. Understanding this inflammatory component offers promising insights into AVM pathogenesis and may facilitate the development of preventive strategies to mitigate rupture risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 111496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hypothesizing the interplay of thrombus formation, wall enhancement, and perifocal edema as predictive factors for rupture in brain AVMs\",\"authors\":\"Riccardo Ludovichetti , Tze Phei Kee , Taryn Rohringer , Karel G. Terbrugge , Timo Krings\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111496\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The presence of shear stress within intracranial AVMs (arteriovenous malformations) due to high flow, perinidal angiogenesis, intranidal aneurysms, and biological factors are presumed risk factors for rupture. However, emerging imaging and histological evidence suggests that risk factors for AVM rupture may extend beyond the classical understanding. The presence of perifocal edema at the time of rupture, luminal thrombosis, and vessel wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI elucidate the possibility of an underlying inflammatory process within AVMs, which may predispose them to instability and eventual rupture. We hypothesize that for some AVM ruptures, the occurrence of thrombosis within vascular outpouchings of the AVM initiates a cascade of events, including local hypoxia, inflammation, breakdown of the blood–brain barrier and wall matrix degradation, which is evident from the presence of perifocal edema and vessel wall enhancement observed on imaging. These changes might ultimately raise the risk of AVM rupture and subsequent hemorrhage. Understanding this inflammatory component offers promising insights into AVM pathogenesis and may facilitate the development of preventive strategies to mitigate rupture risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical hypotheses\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 111496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical hypotheses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724002391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724002391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hypothesizing the interplay of thrombus formation, wall enhancement, and perifocal edema as predictive factors for rupture in brain AVMs
The presence of shear stress within intracranial AVMs (arteriovenous malformations) due to high flow, perinidal angiogenesis, intranidal aneurysms, and biological factors are presumed risk factors for rupture. However, emerging imaging and histological evidence suggests that risk factors for AVM rupture may extend beyond the classical understanding. The presence of perifocal edema at the time of rupture, luminal thrombosis, and vessel wall enhancement on vessel wall MRI elucidate the possibility of an underlying inflammatory process within AVMs, which may predispose them to instability and eventual rupture. We hypothesize that for some AVM ruptures, the occurrence of thrombosis within vascular outpouchings of the AVM initiates a cascade of events, including local hypoxia, inflammation, breakdown of the blood–brain barrier and wall matrix degradation, which is evident from the presence of perifocal edema and vessel wall enhancement observed on imaging. These changes might ultimately raise the risk of AVM rupture and subsequent hemorrhage. Understanding this inflammatory component offers promising insights into AVM pathogenesis and may facilitate the development of preventive strategies to mitigate rupture risk.
期刊介绍:
Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.