Yusuke Fujita , Koya Hida , Daisuke Nishizaki , Yoshiro Itatani , Shigeki Arizono , Takashi Akiyoshi , Eisuke Asano , Toshiyuki Enomoto , Takeshi Naitoh , Kazutaka Obama , Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
{"title":"新辅助化放疗与延长磁共振成像检测到硬膜外血管侵犯(mrEMVI)阳性直肠癌患者的无复发生存期有关:日本一项多中心回顾性队列研究","authors":"Yusuke Fujita , Koya Hida , Daisuke Nishizaki , Yoshiro Itatani , Shigeki Arizono , Takashi Akiyoshi , Eisuke Asano , Toshiyuki Enomoto , Takeshi Naitoh , Kazutaka Obama , Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is employed for the local control of locally advanced rectal cancer; however, its prognostic impact is limited and often impairs pelvic organ function. Therefore, careful patient selection is essential. This study aimed to investigate the impact of nCRT on relapse-free survival (RFS) by stratifying patients according to MRI detected circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) or extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI), as the ability of MRI findings to identify patients who will have beneficial outcomes from nCRT is uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed patients with clinical stage II–III lower rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with or without nCRT between 2010 and 2011 at 69 hospitals in Japan. The impact of nCRT on RFS was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models in the entire cohort and in subgroups stratified by mrCRM or mrEMVI status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the entire cohort (nCRT, n = 172; surgery alone, n = 503), nCRT showed a trend toward improved RFS, although the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.54–1.03; P = 0.074). Among mrCRM-negative and mrEMVI-negative patients, there were no significant differences in RFS between the nCRT and surgery-alone groups. Among mrCRM-positive patients, nCRT tended to improve the RFS (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.46–1.06; P = 0.089). Among mrEMVI-positive patients, nCRT significantly prolonged the RFS (HR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.38–1.00; P = 0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to surgery alone, nCRT did not significantly improve RFS in the overall population but significantly improved RFS in mrEMVI-positive patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is associated with prolonged relapse free survival in patient with MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) positive rectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan\",\"authors\":\"Yusuke Fujita , Koya Hida , Daisuke Nishizaki , Yoshiro Itatani , Shigeki Arizono , Takashi Akiyoshi , Eisuke Asano , Toshiyuki Enomoto , Takeshi Naitoh , Kazutaka Obama , Japan Society of Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is employed for the local control of locally advanced rectal cancer; however, its prognostic impact is limited and often impairs pelvic organ function. Therefore, careful patient selection is essential. This study aimed to investigate the impact of nCRT on relapse-free survival (RFS) by stratifying patients according to MRI detected circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) or extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI), as the ability of MRI findings to identify patients who will have beneficial outcomes from nCRT is uncertain.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We retrospectively analyzed patients with clinical stage II–III lower rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with or without nCRT between 2010 and 2011 at 69 hospitals in Japan. The impact of nCRT on RFS was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models in the entire cohort and in subgroups stratified by mrCRM or mrEMVI status.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In the entire cohort (nCRT, n = 172; surgery alone, n = 503), nCRT showed a trend toward improved RFS, although the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.54–1.03; P = 0.074). Among mrCRM-negative and mrEMVI-negative patients, there were no significant differences in RFS between the nCRT and surgery-alone groups. Among mrCRM-positive patients, nCRT tended to improve the RFS (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.46–1.06; P = 0.089). Among mrEMVI-positive patients, nCRT significantly prolonged the RFS (HR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.38–1.00; P = 0.048).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared to surgery alone, nCRT did not significantly improve RFS in the overall population but significantly improved RFS in mrEMVI-positive patients.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424001257\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424001257","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is associated with prolonged relapse free survival in patient with MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) positive rectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan
Purpose
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is employed for the local control of locally advanced rectal cancer; however, its prognostic impact is limited and often impairs pelvic organ function. Therefore, careful patient selection is essential. This study aimed to investigate the impact of nCRT on relapse-free survival (RFS) by stratifying patients according to MRI detected circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) or extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI), as the ability of MRI findings to identify patients who will have beneficial outcomes from nCRT is uncertain.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed patients with clinical stage II–III lower rectal cancer who underwent surgical resection with or without nCRT between 2010 and 2011 at 69 hospitals in Japan. The impact of nCRT on RFS was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression models in the entire cohort and in subgroups stratified by mrCRM or mrEMVI status.
Results
In the entire cohort (nCRT, n = 172; surgery alone, n = 503), nCRT showed a trend toward improved RFS, although the difference was not statistically significant (HR, 0.74; 95 % CI, 0.54–1.03; P = 0.074). Among mrCRM-negative and mrEMVI-negative patients, there were no significant differences in RFS between the nCRT and surgery-alone groups. Among mrCRM-positive patients, nCRT tended to improve the RFS (HR, 0.70; 95 % CI, 0.46–1.06; P = 0.089). Among mrEMVI-positive patients, nCRT significantly prolonged the RFS (HR, 0.62; 95 % CI, 0.38–1.00; P = 0.048).
Conclusions
Compared to surgery alone, nCRT did not significantly improve RFS in the overall population but significantly improved RFS in mrEMVI-positive patients.
期刊介绍:
Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.