急诊医生要花费更多的时间来护理使用英语以外语言的病人,而这可能没有计入报销结构中。

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Martin A. Reznek MD, MBA, Jennifer Edwards MD, MBA, Sean S. Michael MD, MBA, Jacqueline Furbacher MD, MS, Alexandra Sanseverino MD, MBA, Payal K. Modi MD, MPH, Kevin A. Kotkowski MD, MBA, Celine Larkin PhD
{"title":"急诊医生要花费更多的时间来护理使用英语以外语言的病人,而这可能没有计入报销结构中。","authors":"Martin A. Reznek MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jennifer Edwards MD, MBA,&nbsp;Sean S. Michael MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jacqueline Furbacher MD, MS,&nbsp;Alexandra Sanseverino MD, MBA,&nbsp;Payal K. Modi MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kevin A. Kotkowski MD, MBA,&nbsp;Celine Larkin PhD","doi":"10.1002/emp2.13332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency departments increasingly serve patients who prefer a language other than English. Honoring patients’ language preferences is crucial for quality and cultural appropriateness of care. We sought to assess whether time spent in caring for patients who preferred a language other than English differed from patients whose language preference was English. Secondarily, we sought to assess professional reimbursement across the two groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We retrospectively analyzed an existing dataset from a time-in-motion study that included direct observation measurements of emergency physicians’ time spent during patient encounters. Our primary outcome was physician time spent conducting patient care, comparing patients who preferred a language other than English to patients who preferred English. Secondarily, we sought to assess if relative value unit (RVU)-based compensation differed across the two groups. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariable regression.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across 218 patient encounters, physicians spent 18.6% longer on encounters with patients whose preferred a language other than English (median = 18.5 min, interquartile range [IQR] 14.8–27.9 min) than for those who preferred English (median = 15.6 min, IQR 11.5–22.9 min; <i>p</i> = 0.04). After controlling for other factors, patients’ preferred language was not associated with increased RVUs (<i>β</i> = −0.12, <i>t</i> = −1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.055).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Emergency physicians appear to spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English. This additional effort during the care of this potentially vulnerable population may not be reflected in past and current reimbursement structures. Additional research is prudent as we seek to better address social determinants of health in care delivery and reimbursement systems.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13332","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Emergency physicians spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English which may not be accounted for in reimbursement structures\",\"authors\":\"Martin A. Reznek MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jennifer Edwards MD, MBA,&nbsp;Sean S. Michael MD, MBA,&nbsp;Jacqueline Furbacher MD, MS,&nbsp;Alexandra Sanseverino MD, MBA,&nbsp;Payal K. Modi MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kevin A. Kotkowski MD, MBA,&nbsp;Celine Larkin PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/emp2.13332\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emergency departments increasingly serve patients who prefer a language other than English. Honoring patients’ language preferences is crucial for quality and cultural appropriateness of care. We sought to assess whether time spent in caring for patients who preferred a language other than English differed from patients whose language preference was English. Secondarily, we sought to assess professional reimbursement across the two groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We retrospectively analyzed an existing dataset from a time-in-motion study that included direct observation measurements of emergency physicians’ time spent during patient encounters. Our primary outcome was physician time spent conducting patient care, comparing patients who preferred a language other than English to patients who preferred English. Secondarily, we sought to assess if relative value unit (RVU)-based compensation differed across the two groups. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariable regression.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Across 218 patient encounters, physicians spent 18.6% longer on encounters with patients whose preferred a language other than English (median = 18.5 min, interquartile range [IQR] 14.8–27.9 min) than for those who preferred English (median = 15.6 min, IQR 11.5–22.9 min; <i>p</i> = 0.04). After controlling for other factors, patients’ preferred language was not associated with increased RVUs (<i>β</i> = −0.12, <i>t</i> = −1.94, <i>p</i> = 0.055).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Emergency physicians appear to spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English. This additional effort during the care of this potentially vulnerable population may not be reflected in past and current reimbursement structures. Additional research is prudent as we seek to better address social determinants of health in care delivery and reimbursement systems.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/emp2.13332\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13332\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/emp2.13332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急诊科为越来越多喜欢使用英语以外语言的患者提供服务。尊重患者的语言偏好对于护理质量和文化适宜性至关重要。我们试图评估护理偏好英语以外语言的患者所花费的时间与护理偏好英语的患者所花费的时间是否存在差异。其次,我们还试图评估两组患者的专业报销情况。 方法 我们回顾性地分析了现有的运动时间研究数据集,其中包括对急诊科医生在接诊患者时所花费时间的直接观察测量。我们的主要研究结果是医生为患者提供护理所花费的时间,并将偏好英语以外语言的患者与偏好英语的患者进行了比较。其次,我们试图评估基于相对价值单位(RVU)的报酬在两组之间是否存在差异。我们计算了描述性统计并进行了多变量回归。 结果 在与 218 位患者的接触中,医生与偏好英语以外语言的患者接触的时间(中位数 = 18.5 分钟,四分位数间距 [IQR] 14.8-27.9 分钟)比偏好英语的患者(中位数 = 15.6 分钟,四分位数间距 11.5-22.9 分钟;P = 0.04)长 18.6%。在控制了其他因素后,患者首选语言与 RVUs 的增加无关(β = -0.12,t = -1.94,p = 0.055)。 结论 急诊医生似乎要花费更多的时间来护理偏好英语以外语言的患者。在对这一潜在弱势群体的护理过程中所付出的额外努力可能并未反映在过去和当前的报销结构中。当我们寻求在医疗服务和报销体系中更好地处理健康的社会决定因素时,进行更多的研究是明智之举。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Emergency physicians spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English which may not be accounted for in reimbursement structures

Emergency physicians spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English which may not be accounted for in reimbursement structures

Background

Emergency departments increasingly serve patients who prefer a language other than English. Honoring patients’ language preferences is crucial for quality and cultural appropriateness of care. We sought to assess whether time spent in caring for patients who preferred a language other than English differed from patients whose language preference was English. Secondarily, we sought to assess professional reimbursement across the two groups.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed an existing dataset from a time-in-motion study that included direct observation measurements of emergency physicians’ time spent during patient encounters. Our primary outcome was physician time spent conducting patient care, comparing patients who preferred a language other than English to patients who preferred English. Secondarily, we sought to assess if relative value unit (RVU)-based compensation differed across the two groups. We calculated descriptive statistics and performed multivariable regression.

Results

Across 218 patient encounters, physicians spent 18.6% longer on encounters with patients whose preferred a language other than English (median = 18.5 min, interquartile range [IQR] 14.8–27.9 min) than for those who preferred English (median = 15.6 min, IQR 11.5–22.9 min; p = 0.04). After controlling for other factors, patients’ preferred language was not associated with increased RVUs (β = −0.12, t = −1.94, p = 0.055).

Conclusions

Emergency physicians appear to spend more time caring for patients who prefer a language other than English. This additional effort during the care of this potentially vulnerable population may not be reflected in past and current reimbursement structures. Additional research is prudent as we seek to better address social determinants of health in care delivery and reimbursement systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信