{"title":"上诉法院的新案例认定《第二编》不允许精神损害赔偿","authors":"Marc Charmatz Esq.","doi":"10.1002/dhe.31844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In <i>Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C</i>, 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not available under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794), a statute enacted pursuant to the spending clause of the United States Constitution. The Court left open the question of whether emotional distress damages are available under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12135-65).</p>","PeriodicalId":100378,"journal":{"name":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","volume":"30 4","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New appeals court case finds Title II does not allow for emotional distress damages\",\"authors\":\"Marc Charmatz Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dhe.31844\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In <i>Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C</i>, 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not available under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794), a statute enacted pursuant to the spending clause of the United States Constitution. The Court left open the question of whether emotional distress damages are available under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12135-65).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability Compliance for Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31844\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability Compliance for Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dhe.31844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在 "Cummings 诉 Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C "一案（142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022)）中，美国最高法院认为，根据《康复法》第 504 条（29 U.S.C. 794），不能获得精神损害赔偿，该法是根据《美国宪法》的支出条款颁布的。法院对《美国残疾人法》（Americans with Disabilities Act）第二章（42 U.S.C. 12135-65）是否提供精神损害赔偿的问题保持开放态度。
New appeals court case finds Title II does not allow for emotional distress damages
In Cummings v. Premier Rehab Keller P.L.L.C, 142 S. Ct. 1562 (2022), the United States Supreme Court held that emotional distress damages are not available under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (29 U.S.C. 794), a statute enacted pursuant to the spending clause of the United States Constitution. The Court left open the question of whether emotional distress damages are available under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. 12135-65).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
