定量火山灰浓度和沿飞行剂量预报对模型结构选择的依赖程度如何?

IF 2.3 4区 地球科学 Q3 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Lauren A. James, Helen F. Dacre, Natalie J. Harvey
{"title":"定量火山灰浓度和沿飞行剂量预报对模型结构选择的依赖程度如何?","authors":"Lauren A. James,&nbsp;Helen F. Dacre,&nbsp;Natalie J. Harvey","doi":"10.1002/met.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Producing quantitative volcanic ash forecasts is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. Careful consideration of this uncertainty is required to produce timely and robust hazard warnings. Structural uncertainty occurs when a model fails to produce accurate forecasts, despite good knowledge of the eruption source parameters, meteorological conditions and suitable parameterizations of transport and deposition processes. This uncertainty is frequently overlooked in forecasting practices. Using a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, simulations with varied output spatial resolution, temporal averaging period and particle release rate are performed to quantify the impact of these structural choices. This experiment reveals that, for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, structural choices give measurements of peak ash concentration spanning an order of magnitude, significantly impacting decision-relevant thresholds used in aviation flight planning. Conversely, along-flight dosage estimates exhibit less sensitivity to structural choices, suggesting it is a more robust metric to use in flight planning. Uncertainty can be reduced by eliminating structural choices that do not result in a favourable level of agreement with a high-resolution reference simulation. Reliable forecasts require output spatial resolution <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\le $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 80 km, temporal averaging periods <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≤</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\le $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 3 h and particle release rates <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>≥</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ \\ge $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 5000 particles/h. This suggests that simulations with relatively small numbers of particles could be used to produce a large ensemble of simulations without significant loss of accuracy. Comparison with previous Raikoke simulations indicates that the uncertainty associated with these constrained structural choices is smaller than those associated with satellite constrained eruption source parameter and internal model parameter uncertainties. Thus, given suitable structural choices, other epistemic sources of uncertainty are likely to dominate. This insight is useful for the design of ensemble methodologies which are required to enable a shift from deterministic to probabilistic forecasting. The results are applicable to other long-range dispersion problems and to Eulerian dispersion models.</p>","PeriodicalId":49825,"journal":{"name":"Meteorological Applications","volume":"31 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How dependent are quantitative volcanic ash concentration and along-flight dosage forecasts to model structural choices?\",\"authors\":\"Lauren A. James,&nbsp;Helen F. Dacre,&nbsp;Natalie J. Harvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/met.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Producing quantitative volcanic ash forecasts is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. Careful consideration of this uncertainty is required to produce timely and robust hazard warnings. Structural uncertainty occurs when a model fails to produce accurate forecasts, despite good knowledge of the eruption source parameters, meteorological conditions and suitable parameterizations of transport and deposition processes. This uncertainty is frequently overlooked in forecasting practices. Using a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, simulations with varied output spatial resolution, temporal averaging period and particle release rate are performed to quantify the impact of these structural choices. This experiment reveals that, for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, structural choices give measurements of peak ash concentration spanning an order of magnitude, significantly impacting decision-relevant thresholds used in aviation flight planning. Conversely, along-flight dosage estimates exhibit less sensitivity to structural choices, suggesting it is a more robust metric to use in flight planning. Uncertainty can be reduced by eliminating structural choices that do not result in a favourable level of agreement with a high-resolution reference simulation. Reliable forecasts require output spatial resolution <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\le $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 80 km, temporal averaging periods <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>≤</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\le $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 3 h and particle release rates <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>≥</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ \\\\ge $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 5000 particles/h. This suggests that simulations with relatively small numbers of particles could be used to produce a large ensemble of simulations without significant loss of accuracy. Comparison with previous Raikoke simulations indicates that the uncertainty associated with these constrained structural choices is smaller than those associated with satellite constrained eruption source parameter and internal model parameter uncertainties. Thus, given suitable structural choices, other epistemic sources of uncertainty are likely to dominate. This insight is useful for the design of ensemble methodologies which are required to enable a shift from deterministic to probabilistic forecasting. The results are applicable to other long-range dispersion problems and to Eulerian dispersion models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/met.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meteorological Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meteorological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/met.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于存在多种不确定因素,制作火山灰定量预报具有挑战性。需要仔细考虑这些不确定性,才能及时发布可靠的危险预警。尽管对火山爆发源参数、气象条件和适当的迁移和沉积过程参数有很好的了解,但当模型无法生成准确的预报时,就会出现结构不确定性。这种不确定性在预报实践中经常被忽视。利用拉格朗日粒子扩散模型,对不同的输出空间分辨率、时间平均周期和粒子释放率进行模拟,以量化这些结构选择的影响。实验结果表明,对于 2019 年的雷科科火山爆发,结构选择可测量出跨越一个数量级的火山灰峰值浓度,从而对航空飞行规划中使用的决策相关阈值产生重大影响。相反,沿飞行剂量估计值对结构选择的敏感性较低,表明它是用于飞行规划的更稳健的指标。通过消除与高分辨率参考模拟不一致的结构选择,可以减少不确定性。可靠的预报要求输出空间分辨率≤ $ \le $ 80 km,时间平均周期≤ $ \le $ 3 h,粒子释放率≥ $ \ge $ 5000 粒子/h。这表明,用相对较少的粒子数进行模拟,可以产生大量的模拟集合,而不会明显降低精度。与以前的 Raikoke 模拟比较表明,与这些受限结构选择相关的不确定性小于与卫星受限喷发源参数和内部模型参数不确定性相关的不确定性。因此,在结构选择合适的情况下,其他认识来源的不确定性可能会占主导地位。这一见解对设计集合方法很有帮助,而集合方法是实现从确定性预报向概率预报转变所必需的。这些结果适用于其他远距离弥散问题和欧拉弥散模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How dependent are quantitative volcanic ash concentration and along-flight dosage forecasts to model structural choices?

Producing quantitative volcanic ash forecasts is challenging due to multiple sources of uncertainty. Careful consideration of this uncertainty is required to produce timely and robust hazard warnings. Structural uncertainty occurs when a model fails to produce accurate forecasts, despite good knowledge of the eruption source parameters, meteorological conditions and suitable parameterizations of transport and deposition processes. This uncertainty is frequently overlooked in forecasting practices. Using a Lagrangian particle dispersion model, simulations with varied output spatial resolution, temporal averaging period and particle release rate are performed to quantify the impact of these structural choices. This experiment reveals that, for the 2019 Raikoke eruption, structural choices give measurements of peak ash concentration spanning an order of magnitude, significantly impacting decision-relevant thresholds used in aviation flight planning. Conversely, along-flight dosage estimates exhibit less sensitivity to structural choices, suggesting it is a more robust metric to use in flight planning. Uncertainty can be reduced by eliminating structural choices that do not result in a favourable level of agreement with a high-resolution reference simulation. Reliable forecasts require output spatial resolution $$ \le $$ 80 km, temporal averaging periods $$ \le $$ 3 h and particle release rates $$ \ge $$ 5000 particles/h. This suggests that simulations with relatively small numbers of particles could be used to produce a large ensemble of simulations without significant loss of accuracy. Comparison with previous Raikoke simulations indicates that the uncertainty associated with these constrained structural choices is smaller than those associated with satellite constrained eruption source parameter and internal model parameter uncertainties. Thus, given suitable structural choices, other epistemic sources of uncertainty are likely to dominate. This insight is useful for the design of ensemble methodologies which are required to enable a shift from deterministic to probabilistic forecasting. The results are applicable to other long-range dispersion problems and to Eulerian dispersion models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Meteorological Applications
Meteorological Applications 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Meteorological Applications is to serve the needs of applied meteorologists, forecasters and users of meteorological services by publishing papers on all aspects of meteorological science, including: applications of meteorological, climatological, analytical and forecasting data, and their socio-economic benefits; forecasting, warning and service delivery techniques and methods; weather hazards, their analysis and prediction; performance, verification and value of numerical models and forecasting services; practical applications of ocean and climate models; education and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信