Kuo-Kai Chin ∗ , Yannis Valtis ∗ , Andriy Derkach , Meira Yisraeli Salman , Leora Boussi , Jenna Ciervo , Mark B. Geyer , Jae H. Park , Martin S. Tallman , Jacob L. Glass , Aaron D. Goldberg , Eytan M. Stein
{"title":"成人急性髓性白血病患者使用低甲基化药物和 Venetoclax 后的强化化疗","authors":"Kuo-Kai Chin ∗ , Yannis Valtis ∗ , Andriy Derkach , Meira Yisraeli Salman , Leora Boussi , Jenna Ciervo , Mark B. Geyer , Jae H. Park , Martin S. Tallman , Jacob L. Glass , Aaron D. Goldberg , Eytan M. Stein","doi":"10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>The combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) is approved for adults aged >75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as well as those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC). HMA/VEN is increasingly substituted for IC in adults with AML aged <75 years, particularly in those with adverse cytogenetic and molecular features. When patients fail to respond or relapse after HMA/VEN, the utility of salvage IC is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective single-institution study and identified 46 patients who received IC after HMA/VEN, including 24 patients who received HMA/VEN as their first treatment for AML. This population had complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)/morphologic leukemia-free state rate of 37%, CR/CRi rate of 28%, and a median overall survival (mOS) of 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-10.3). Patients who relapsed after an initial response to HMA/VEN and subsequently received IC were more likely to achieve a CR/CRi than those refractory to HMA/VEN (50% vs 19%; <em>P</em> = .04), although there was no statistically significant difference in survival (mOS, 8.8 vs 5.4 months; <em>P</em> = .64). Age >65 years predicted poorer survival (mOS, 4.3 vs 10.6 months; <em>P</em> < .001). IC after HMA/VEN should be further studied and chosen with caution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100189,"journal":{"name":"Blood Neoplasia","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100038"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensive chemotherapy after hypomethylating agent and venetoclax in adult acute myeloid leukemia\",\"authors\":\"Kuo-Kai Chin ∗ , Yannis Valtis ∗ , Andriy Derkach , Meira Yisraeli Salman , Leora Boussi , Jenna Ciervo , Mark B. Geyer , Jae H. Park , Martin S. Tallman , Jacob L. Glass , Aaron D. Goldberg , Eytan M. Stein\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bneo.2024.100038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Abstract</h3><div>The combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) is approved for adults aged >75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as well as those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC). HMA/VEN is increasingly substituted for IC in adults with AML aged <75 years, particularly in those with adverse cytogenetic and molecular features. When patients fail to respond or relapse after HMA/VEN, the utility of salvage IC is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective single-institution study and identified 46 patients who received IC after HMA/VEN, including 24 patients who received HMA/VEN as their first treatment for AML. This population had complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)/morphologic leukemia-free state rate of 37%, CR/CRi rate of 28%, and a median overall survival (mOS) of 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-10.3). Patients who relapsed after an initial response to HMA/VEN and subsequently received IC were more likely to achieve a CR/CRi than those refractory to HMA/VEN (50% vs 19%; <em>P</em> = .04), although there was no statistically significant difference in survival (mOS, 8.8 vs 5.4 months; <em>P</em> = .64). Age >65 years predicted poorer survival (mOS, 4.3 vs 10.6 months; <em>P</em> < .001). IC after HMA/VEN should be further studied and chosen with caution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"volume\":\"1 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 100038\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Blood Neoplasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000384\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Blood Neoplasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950328024000384","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要低甲基化药物(HMA)和 Venetoclax(VEN)的联合用药已被批准用于年龄为 75 岁的新诊断急性髓性白血病(AML)成人患者以及不符合强化化疗(IC)条件的患者。在 75 岁的成人急性髓细胞白血病患者中,HMA/VEN 越来越多地取代 IC,尤其是那些细胞遗传学和分子特征不良的患者。当患者接受HMA/VEN治疗后无反应或复发时,挽救性IC的效用在很大程度上还不得而知。我们进行了一项单机构回顾性研究,确定了 46 名在 HMA/VEN 后接受 IC 治疗的患者,其中包括 24 名首次接受 HMA/VEN 治疗的急性髓细胞性白血病患者。这些患者的完全缓解(CR)/CR伴不完全计数恢复(CRi)/无形态白血病状态率为37%,CR/CRi率为28%,中位总生存期(mOS)为7.2个月(95%置信区间,5.0-10.3)。与HMA/VEN难治性患者相比,HMA/VEN初始反应后复发并随后接受IC治疗的患者更有可能获得CR/CRi(50% vs 19%;P = .04),但生存期(mOS,8.8个月 vs 5.4个月;P = .64)没有显著统计学差异。65岁的患者生存率较低(mOS,4.3 个月 vs 10.6 个月;P = .001)。应进一步研究 HMA/VEN 后的 IC,并谨慎选择。
Intensive chemotherapy after hypomethylating agent and venetoclax in adult acute myeloid leukemia
Abstract
The combination of a hypomethylating agent (HMA) and venetoclax (VEN) is approved for adults aged >75 years with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) as well as those ineligible for intensive chemotherapy (IC). HMA/VEN is increasingly substituted for IC in adults with AML aged <75 years, particularly in those with adverse cytogenetic and molecular features. When patients fail to respond or relapse after HMA/VEN, the utility of salvage IC is largely unknown. We performed a retrospective single-institution study and identified 46 patients who received IC after HMA/VEN, including 24 patients who received HMA/VEN as their first treatment for AML. This population had complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi)/morphologic leukemia-free state rate of 37%, CR/CRi rate of 28%, and a median overall survival (mOS) of 7.2 months (95% confidence interval, 5.0-10.3). Patients who relapsed after an initial response to HMA/VEN and subsequently received IC were more likely to achieve a CR/CRi than those refractory to HMA/VEN (50% vs 19%; P = .04), although there was no statistically significant difference in survival (mOS, 8.8 vs 5.4 months; P = .64). Age >65 years predicted poorer survival (mOS, 4.3 vs 10.6 months; P < .001). IC after HMA/VEN should be further studied and chosen with caution.