{"title":"通过探究连续异构如何影响重组,可以深入了解 RecA 介导的双链断裂修复。","authors":"Claudia Danilowicz,Jonathan Fu,Mara Prentiss","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107887","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Homologous recombination can promote correct repair of double strand breaks (DSB) in DNA by aligning a sequence region in the broken chromosome with the corresponding sequence region in an unbroken chromosome. D-loops join the broken and unbroken chromosomes during homology testing. Previous work studied how some mismatches affect the stability of D-loops, but they did not probe whether the D-loops disrupt regions of contiguous mismatches or simply bypass them. Furthermore, previous work has not considered how the length of flanking homology affects D-loop disruption of regions of contiguous mismatches. Finally, there are conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. We demonstrate that with or without ATP hydrolysis invading strands with 6 contiguous mismatches and sufficient flanking homology readily form D-loops that disrupt the structure of the mismatched region and incorporate both flanking homologous regions. Unsurprisingly, the probability that D-loops will incorporate both flanking homologous regions decreases as the number of mismatched bases increases. Furthermore, though D-loops may progress through homologous regions initially and dominantly in the 5' to 3' direction with respect to the single strand in the broken chromosome, our results suggest that progress through contiguous mismatches proceeds dominantly in the 3' to 5' direction. These results may reconcile previous conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. Additionally, the results suggest that homology recognition is not characterized by any simple iterative decision tree model that considers each homology testing step separately. Instead, homology recognition involves collective interactions. Finally, we consider implications for DSB repair.","PeriodicalId":15140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight into RecA-mediated repair of double strand breaks is provided by probing how contiguous heterology affects recombination.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Danilowicz,Jonathan Fu,Mara Prentiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107887\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Homologous recombination can promote correct repair of double strand breaks (DSB) in DNA by aligning a sequence region in the broken chromosome with the corresponding sequence region in an unbroken chromosome. D-loops join the broken and unbroken chromosomes during homology testing. Previous work studied how some mismatches affect the stability of D-loops, but they did not probe whether the D-loops disrupt regions of contiguous mismatches or simply bypass them. Furthermore, previous work has not considered how the length of flanking homology affects D-loop disruption of regions of contiguous mismatches. Finally, there are conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. We demonstrate that with or without ATP hydrolysis invading strands with 6 contiguous mismatches and sufficient flanking homology readily form D-loops that disrupt the structure of the mismatched region and incorporate both flanking homologous regions. Unsurprisingly, the probability that D-loops will incorporate both flanking homologous regions decreases as the number of mismatched bases increases. Furthermore, though D-loops may progress through homologous regions initially and dominantly in the 5' to 3' direction with respect to the single strand in the broken chromosome, our results suggest that progress through contiguous mismatches proceeds dominantly in the 3' to 5' direction. These results may reconcile previous conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. Additionally, the results suggest that homology recognition is not characterized by any simple iterative decision tree model that considers each homology testing step separately. Instead, homology recognition involves collective interactions. Finally, we consider implications for DSB repair.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biological Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biological Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107887\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2024.107887","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
同源重组可将断裂染色体中的序列区与未断裂染色体中的相应序列区对齐,从而促进 DNA 双链断裂(DSB)的正确修复。在同源检测过程中,D-环会将断裂和未断裂的染色体连接起来。以前的工作研究了一些错配如何影响 D 环的稳定性,但没有探究 D 环是破坏了连续错配区域,还是仅仅绕过了错配区域。此外,以前的研究也没有考虑侧翼同源性的长度如何影响 D 环对连续错配区域的破坏。最后,关于 D 环延伸的极性也存在冲突。我们证明,无论有无 ATP 水解,具有 6 个连续错配和足够侧翼同源性的入侵链都很容易形成 D-环,从而破坏错配区域的结构,并将两个侧翼同源区域结合在一起。不足为奇的是,随着错配碱基数量的增加,D-环结合两个侧翼同源区的概率会降低。此外,虽然 D 环最初可能会穿过同源区,而且相对于断裂染色体中的单链而言,主要是沿着 5' 到 3' 的方向前进,但我们的结果表明,穿过连续错配的过程主要是沿着 3' 到 5' 的方向前进。这些结果可能会调和以前关于 D 环延伸极性的冲突。此外,研究结果还表明,同源性识别并不以任何简单的迭代决策树模型为特征,这种模型会单独考虑每个同源性测试步骤。相反,同源性识别涉及集体相互作用。最后,我们考虑了对 DSB 修复的影响。
Insight into RecA-mediated repair of double strand breaks is provided by probing how contiguous heterology affects recombination.
Homologous recombination can promote correct repair of double strand breaks (DSB) in DNA by aligning a sequence region in the broken chromosome with the corresponding sequence region in an unbroken chromosome. D-loops join the broken and unbroken chromosomes during homology testing. Previous work studied how some mismatches affect the stability of D-loops, but they did not probe whether the D-loops disrupt regions of contiguous mismatches or simply bypass them. Furthermore, previous work has not considered how the length of flanking homology affects D-loop disruption of regions of contiguous mismatches. Finally, there are conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. We demonstrate that with or without ATP hydrolysis invading strands with 6 contiguous mismatches and sufficient flanking homology readily form D-loops that disrupt the structure of the mismatched region and incorporate both flanking homologous regions. Unsurprisingly, the probability that D-loops will incorporate both flanking homologous regions decreases as the number of mismatched bases increases. Furthermore, though D-loops may progress through homologous regions initially and dominantly in the 5' to 3' direction with respect to the single strand in the broken chromosome, our results suggest that progress through contiguous mismatches proceeds dominantly in the 3' to 5' direction. These results may reconcile previous conflicts about the polarity of D-loop extension. Additionally, the results suggest that homology recognition is not characterized by any simple iterative decision tree model that considers each homology testing step separately. Instead, homology recognition involves collective interactions. Finally, we consider implications for DSB repair.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biological Chemistry welcomes high-quality science that seeks to elucidate the molecular and cellular basis of biological processes. Papers published in JBC can therefore fall under the umbrellas of not only biological chemistry, chemical biology, or biochemistry, but also allied disciplines such as biophysics, systems biology, RNA biology, immunology, microbiology, neurobiology, epigenetics, computational biology, ’omics, and many more. The outcome of our focus on papers that contribute novel and important mechanistic insights, rather than on a particular topic area, is that JBC is truly a melting pot for scientists across disciplines. In addition, JBC welcomes papers that describe methods that will help scientists push their biochemical inquiries forward and resources that will be of use to the research community.