研究抛物面槽式集热器,并对具有可变镜面效率的控制器和估算器进行关键分析

IF 3.3 2区 计算机科学 Q2 AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS
Dibyajyoti Baidya , Surender Kannaiyan , Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde
{"title":"研究抛物面槽式集热器,并对具有可变镜面效率的控制器和估算器进行关键分析","authors":"Dibyajyoti Baidya ,&nbsp;Surender Kannaiyan ,&nbsp;Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde","doi":"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Solar Thermal Power (STP) plants are a crucial technology for converting solar energy into electricity. Among the STP, the Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) is one of the integral parts of STP systems for electrical power generation. Maximizing PTC performance is a challenge due to dynamic and unpredictable solar radiation and environmental disturbances, such as cloud cover and dust accumulation. The optical efficiency parameter of the PTC is critical for calculating the desired heat gain, which is difficult to measure in real-time, necessitating sophisticated control and estimation strategies for optimal heat regulation. This study introduces two control mechanisms for the PTC system and comparing their efficacy. A classical PI controller supplemented by Static Feed-Forward (SFF) control demonstrates improved performance with an optimal transfer function model. In contrast, Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) excels in disturbance rejection and setpoint tracking, considering operational constraints. The NMPC controller notably outperforms the PI controller with SFF in performance metrics, with the Integral Time Squared Error (ITSE) decreasing by approximately 99% across case studies. Also, in the case of heat gain, NMPC controller exhibits percentage increases when compared to the PI controller. Furthermore, since the measurement of optical efficiency is essential, but due to difficulty in the measurement for various reasons, the estimator is used as a virtual sensor to estimate those optical efficiency. The unmeasured states and parameters, including optical efficiencies of the PTC, are estimated using Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) techniques, with UKF exhibiting superior accuracy. However, considering the average computation time, EKF is preferred for real-time applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Process Control","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 103317"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study of parabolic trough collector with crucial analysis on controller and estimator with variable mirror efficiency\",\"authors\":\"Dibyajyoti Baidya ,&nbsp;Surender Kannaiyan ,&nbsp;Neeraj Dhanraj Bokde\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jprocont.2024.103317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Solar Thermal Power (STP) plants are a crucial technology for converting solar energy into electricity. Among the STP, the Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) is one of the integral parts of STP systems for electrical power generation. Maximizing PTC performance is a challenge due to dynamic and unpredictable solar radiation and environmental disturbances, such as cloud cover and dust accumulation. The optical efficiency parameter of the PTC is critical for calculating the desired heat gain, which is difficult to measure in real-time, necessitating sophisticated control and estimation strategies for optimal heat regulation. This study introduces two control mechanisms for the PTC system and comparing their efficacy. A classical PI controller supplemented by Static Feed-Forward (SFF) control demonstrates improved performance with an optimal transfer function model. In contrast, Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) excels in disturbance rejection and setpoint tracking, considering operational constraints. The NMPC controller notably outperforms the PI controller with SFF in performance metrics, with the Integral Time Squared Error (ITSE) decreasing by approximately 99% across case studies. Also, in the case of heat gain, NMPC controller exhibits percentage increases when compared to the PI controller. Furthermore, since the measurement of optical efficiency is essential, but due to difficulty in the measurement for various reasons, the estimator is used as a virtual sensor to estimate those optical efficiency. The unmeasured states and parameters, including optical efficiencies of the PTC, are estimated using Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) techniques, with UKF exhibiting superior accuracy. However, considering the average computation time, EKF is preferred for real-time applications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103317\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Process Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424001574\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Process Control","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959152424001574","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUTOMATION & CONTROL SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

太阳能热发电厂(STP)是将太阳能转化为电能的关键技术。在 STP 中,抛物面槽式集热器(PTC)是 STP 发电系统不可或缺的组成部分之一。由于太阳辐射和环境干扰(如云层和灰尘积聚)的动态性和不可预测性,最大限度地提高抛物槽式集热器的性能是一项挑战。PTC 的光学效率参数对于计算所需的热增益至关重要,但这一参数很难实时测量,因此需要采用复杂的控制和估算策略来实现最佳热调节。本研究为 PTC 系统引入了两种控制机制,并比较了它们的功效。传统的 PI 控制器辅以静态前馈(SFF)控制,在最佳传递函数模型下表现出更高的性能。相比之下,非线性模型预测控制(NMPC)在干扰抑制和设定点跟踪方面表现出色,同时还考虑到了运行约束条件。在性能指标上,NMPC 控制器明显优于带 SFF 的 PI 控制器,其积分时间平方误差(ITSE)在所有案例研究中都降低了约 99%。此外,与 PI 控制器相比,NMPC 控制器在热增益方面的百分比也有所提高。此外,由于光学效率的测量非常重要,但由于各种原因难以测量,因此使用估算器作为虚拟传感器来估算光学效率。未测量的状态和参数,包括 PTC 的光学效率,使用扩展卡尔曼滤波器(EKF)和无符号卡尔曼滤波器(UKF)技术进行估计,其中 UKF 的精度更高。不过,考虑到平均计算时间,EKF 更适合实时应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study of parabolic trough collector with crucial analysis on controller and estimator with variable mirror efficiency
Solar Thermal Power (STP) plants are a crucial technology for converting solar energy into electricity. Among the STP, the Parabolic Trough Collector (PTC) is one of the integral parts of STP systems for electrical power generation. Maximizing PTC performance is a challenge due to dynamic and unpredictable solar radiation and environmental disturbances, such as cloud cover and dust accumulation. The optical efficiency parameter of the PTC is critical for calculating the desired heat gain, which is difficult to measure in real-time, necessitating sophisticated control and estimation strategies for optimal heat regulation. This study introduces two control mechanisms for the PTC system and comparing their efficacy. A classical PI controller supplemented by Static Feed-Forward (SFF) control demonstrates improved performance with an optimal transfer function model. In contrast, Nonlinear Model Predictive Control (NMPC) excels in disturbance rejection and setpoint tracking, considering operational constraints. The NMPC controller notably outperforms the PI controller with SFF in performance metrics, with the Integral Time Squared Error (ITSE) decreasing by approximately 99% across case studies. Also, in the case of heat gain, NMPC controller exhibits percentage increases when compared to the PI controller. Furthermore, since the measurement of optical efficiency is essential, but due to difficulty in the measurement for various reasons, the estimator is used as a virtual sensor to estimate those optical efficiency. The unmeasured states and parameters, including optical efficiencies of the PTC, are estimated using Extended Kalman Filter (EKF) and Unscented Kalman Filter (UKF) techniques, with UKF exhibiting superior accuracy. However, considering the average computation time, EKF is preferred for real-time applications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Process Control
Journal of Process Control 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
11.90%
发文量
159
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: This international journal covers the application of control theory, operations research, computer science and engineering principles to the solution of process control problems. In addition to the traditional chemical processing and manufacturing applications, the scope of process control problems involves a wide range of applications that includes energy processes, nano-technology, systems biology, bio-medical engineering, pharmaceutical processing technology, energy storage and conversion, smart grid, and data analytics among others. Papers on the theory in these areas will also be accepted provided the theoretical contribution is aimed at the application and the development of process control techniques. Topics covered include: • Control applications• Process monitoring• Plant-wide control• Process control systems• Control techniques and algorithms• Process modelling and simulation• Design methods Advanced design methods exclude well established and widely studied traditional design techniques such as PID tuning and its many variants. Applications in fields such as control of automotive engines, machinery and robotics are not deemed suitable unless a clear motivation for the relevance to process control is provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信