小通道两相流的实验空隙率测量方法

Q4 Engineering
Alireza Abedini , Ali Nouri Borujerdi , Mohammad Najafi , Aminreza Noghrehabadi
{"title":"小通道两相流的实验空隙率测量方法","authors":"Alireza Abedini ,&nbsp;Ali Nouri Borujerdi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Najafi ,&nbsp;Aminreza Noghrehabadi","doi":"10.1016/j.measen.2024.101306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This investigation presents a novel experimental approach for assessing void fraction parameters in two-phase flows within microchannels. The study critiques the conventional impedance methods that utilize alternating current (AC) for void fraction measurements, highlighting the inherent drawbacks such as ground capacitance interference and non-uniform current distribution. To circumvent these issues, the research introduces the use of direct current (DC), which ensures a homogeneous distribution across the conductor's cross-section, as a more reliable alternative. Termed the \"Direct Impedance Method,\" this technique employs DC to enhance the accuracy of void fraction measurements. The study explores various geometric configurations of full-ring and half-ring electrodes, both vertical and horizontal, within a microchannel of 500 μm diameter. An empirical formula is derived to calculate the void fraction from the electrical data obtained. High-speed imaging at 4000 frames per second supplements the method by providing visual confirmation of the flow patterns. The comparative analysis of the direct impedance method and image processing using the homogeneous theoretical model reveals a deviation of approximately 2 %–10 % for the slug and annular flow pattern. In contrast, the deviation is more for the bubble pattern. The results affirm that the Direct Impedance Method is a cost-effective and reasonably precise technique for small-channel applications. Its accuracy is inversely proportional to the channel diameter, rendering it unsuitable for channels larger than 2 mm. The method's low construction cost further enhances its practical appeal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34311,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Sensors","volume":"36 ","pages":"Article 101306"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental void fraction measurement approach of small channel two-phase flow\",\"authors\":\"Alireza Abedini ,&nbsp;Ali Nouri Borujerdi ,&nbsp;Mohammad Najafi ,&nbsp;Aminreza Noghrehabadi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.measen.2024.101306\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This investigation presents a novel experimental approach for assessing void fraction parameters in two-phase flows within microchannels. The study critiques the conventional impedance methods that utilize alternating current (AC) for void fraction measurements, highlighting the inherent drawbacks such as ground capacitance interference and non-uniform current distribution. To circumvent these issues, the research introduces the use of direct current (DC), which ensures a homogeneous distribution across the conductor's cross-section, as a more reliable alternative. Termed the \\\"Direct Impedance Method,\\\" this technique employs DC to enhance the accuracy of void fraction measurements. The study explores various geometric configurations of full-ring and half-ring electrodes, both vertical and horizontal, within a microchannel of 500 μm diameter. An empirical formula is derived to calculate the void fraction from the electrical data obtained. High-speed imaging at 4000 frames per second supplements the method by providing visual confirmation of the flow patterns. The comparative analysis of the direct impedance method and image processing using the homogeneous theoretical model reveals a deviation of approximately 2 %–10 % for the slug and annular flow pattern. In contrast, the deviation is more for the bubble pattern. The results affirm that the Direct Impedance Method is a cost-effective and reasonably precise technique for small-channel applications. Its accuracy is inversely proportional to the channel diameter, rendering it unsuitable for channels larger than 2 mm. The method's low construction cost further enhances its practical appeal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement Sensors\",\"volume\":\"36 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101306\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement Sensors\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002824\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Sensors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917424002824","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究提出了一种新颖的实验方法,用于评估微通道内两相流的空隙率参数。研究对利用交流电测量空隙率的传统阻抗方法进行了批评,强调了其固有的缺点,如接地电容干扰和电流分布不均匀。为了规避这些问题,研究引入了直流电(DC)作为更可靠的替代方法,它能确保导体横截面上的均匀分布。这项技术被称为 "直接阻抗法",利用直流电提高空隙率测量的准确性。该研究探讨了直径为 500 微米的微通道内垂直和水平全环和半环电极的各种几何配置。根据获得的电学数据,得出了计算空隙率的经验公式。每秒 4000 帧的高速成像对该方法进行了补充,提供了流动模式的视觉确认。通过对直接阻抗法和使用均质理论模型的图像处理法进行比较分析,发现弹头和环形流动模式的偏差约为 2%-10%。相比之下,气泡模式的偏差更大。结果证明,直接阻抗法是一种经济有效且相当精确的小通道应用技术。它的精确度与通道直径成反比,因此不适用于大于 2 毫米的通道。该方法的建造成本低,进一步增强了其实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental void fraction measurement approach of small channel two-phase flow
This investigation presents a novel experimental approach for assessing void fraction parameters in two-phase flows within microchannels. The study critiques the conventional impedance methods that utilize alternating current (AC) for void fraction measurements, highlighting the inherent drawbacks such as ground capacitance interference and non-uniform current distribution. To circumvent these issues, the research introduces the use of direct current (DC), which ensures a homogeneous distribution across the conductor's cross-section, as a more reliable alternative. Termed the "Direct Impedance Method," this technique employs DC to enhance the accuracy of void fraction measurements. The study explores various geometric configurations of full-ring and half-ring electrodes, both vertical and horizontal, within a microchannel of 500 μm diameter. An empirical formula is derived to calculate the void fraction from the electrical data obtained. High-speed imaging at 4000 frames per second supplements the method by providing visual confirmation of the flow patterns. The comparative analysis of the direct impedance method and image processing using the homogeneous theoretical model reveals a deviation of approximately 2 %–10 % for the slug and annular flow pattern. In contrast, the deviation is more for the bubble pattern. The results affirm that the Direct Impedance Method is a cost-effective and reasonably precise technique for small-channel applications. Its accuracy is inversely proportional to the channel diameter, rendering it unsuitable for channels larger than 2 mm. The method's low construction cost further enhances its practical appeal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement Sensors
Measurement Sensors Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
56 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信