基于模型的需求规格安全分析

IF 3.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Konstantinos Mokos , Panagiotis Katsaros , Preben Bohn
{"title":"基于模型的需求规格安全分析","authors":"Konstantinos Mokos ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Katsaros ,&nbsp;Preben Bohn","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Model-based design primarily aims to establish a communication framework throughout a system’s design. Moreover, models with formal semantics allow verification based on rigorous methods, including the analysis of system safety. However, building formal models is a tedious manual process and cannot be easily applied to real problems.</div><div>A key gap that hinders automation of model development is that there is no systematic way to connect system requirements with the activity of model-based design. In this article, we introduce a workflow to tackle this gap and ultimately automate the analysis of system safety using formal methods.</div><div>We extend our previous work on boilerplate-based specification of system requirements with ontological semantics towards specifying FDIR (Failure, Detection, Isolation, Recovery) requirements. The workflow is centered around the automated generation of a model skeleton in SLIM, a component-based formal modeling language, from a set of ontology-based requirement specifications. Our approach has been implemented into a dedicated tool, which not only provides visualization of the ontology relations, but also supports traceability of the analysis findings back to the requirements specification. Finally, we provide results on the safety analysis of a real star-tracker system based on a SLIM model derived by minimally changing the auto-generated model skeleton.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Software","volume":"219 ","pages":"Article 112231"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-based safety analysis of requirement specifications\",\"authors\":\"Konstantinos Mokos ,&nbsp;Panagiotis Katsaros ,&nbsp;Preben Bohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jss.2024.112231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Model-based design primarily aims to establish a communication framework throughout a system’s design. Moreover, models with formal semantics allow verification based on rigorous methods, including the analysis of system safety. However, building formal models is a tedious manual process and cannot be easily applied to real problems.</div><div>A key gap that hinders automation of model development is that there is no systematic way to connect system requirements with the activity of model-based design. In this article, we introduce a workflow to tackle this gap and ultimately automate the analysis of system safety using formal methods.</div><div>We extend our previous work on boilerplate-based specification of system requirements with ontological semantics towards specifying FDIR (Failure, Detection, Isolation, Recovery) requirements. The workflow is centered around the automated generation of a model skeleton in SLIM, a component-based formal modeling language, from a set of ontology-based requirement specifications. Our approach has been implemented into a dedicated tool, which not only provides visualization of the ontology relations, but also supports traceability of the analysis findings back to the requirements specification. Finally, we provide results on the safety analysis of a real star-tracker system based on a SLIM model derived by minimally changing the auto-generated model skeleton.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"volume\":\"219 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Software\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002759\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Software","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0164121224002759","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于模型的设计主要是为了在整个系统设计中建立一个通信框架。此外,具有形式语义的模型允许基于严格的方法进行验证,包括系统安全性分析。然而,建立正式模型是一个乏味的手工过程,而且不能轻易应用于实际问题。阻碍模型开发自动化的一个关键缺陷是,没有系统的方法将系统需求与基于模型的设计活动联系起来。在这篇文章中,我们介绍了一种工作流程来解决这个问题,并最终使用形式化方法实现系统安全分析的自动化。我们扩展了之前基于本体语义的锅炉板系统需求规范的工作,以规范 FDIR(故障、检测、隔离、恢复)需求。工作流程的核心是根据一组基于本体的需求规格,用 SLIM(一种基于组件的正式建模语言)自动生成模型骨架。我们的方法已实施到一个专用工具中,该工具不仅提供本体关系的可视化,还支持分析结果与需求规格的可追溯性。最后,我们提供了基于 SLIM 模型的真实星际追踪系统的安全分析结果,该模型是通过对自动生成的模型骨架进行最小化修改而得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model-based safety analysis of requirement specifications
Model-based design primarily aims to establish a communication framework throughout a system’s design. Moreover, models with formal semantics allow verification based on rigorous methods, including the analysis of system safety. However, building formal models is a tedious manual process and cannot be easily applied to real problems.
A key gap that hinders automation of model development is that there is no systematic way to connect system requirements with the activity of model-based design. In this article, we introduce a workflow to tackle this gap and ultimately automate the analysis of system safety using formal methods.
We extend our previous work on boilerplate-based specification of system requirements with ontological semantics towards specifying FDIR (Failure, Detection, Isolation, Recovery) requirements. The workflow is centered around the automated generation of a model skeleton in SLIM, a component-based formal modeling language, from a set of ontology-based requirement specifications. Our approach has been implemented into a dedicated tool, which not only provides visualization of the ontology relations, but also supports traceability of the analysis findings back to the requirements specification. Finally, we provide results on the safety analysis of a real star-tracker system based on a SLIM model derived by minimally changing the auto-generated model skeleton.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Systems and Software
Journal of Systems and Software 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
193
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Systems and Software publishes papers covering all aspects of software engineering and related hardware-software-systems issues. All articles should include a validation of the idea presented, e.g. through case studies, experiments, or systematic comparisons with other approaches already in practice. Topics of interest include, but are not limited to: •Methods and tools for, and empirical studies on, software requirements, design, architecture, verification and validation, maintenance and evolution •Agile, model-driven, service-oriented, open source and global software development •Approaches for mobile, multiprocessing, real-time, distributed, cloud-based, dependable and virtualized systems •Human factors and management concerns of software development •Data management and big data issues of software systems •Metrics and evaluation, data mining of software development resources •Business and economic aspects of software development processes The journal welcomes state-of-the-art surveys and reports of practical experience for all of these topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信