患者在接受早孕评估门诊后的早孕并发症治疗效果

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
SI Amaya, J Zhang, A Chen, SK Mulwa, E Booker, TS Gémesi, A Henkel, K Shaw, J Shorter
{"title":"患者在接受早孕评估门诊后的早孕并发症治疗效果","authors":"SI Amaya,&nbsp;J Zhang,&nbsp;A Chen,&nbsp;SK Mulwa,&nbsp;E Booker,&nbsp;TS Gémesi,&nbsp;A Henkel,&nbsp;K Shaw,&nbsp;J Shorter","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate the healthcare burden experienced by patients with early pregnancy complications seen in an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC) and those never seen in an EPAC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients 18 years and older who presented during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with a complication including vaginal bleeding or pain, early pregnancy loss (EPL), pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), ectopic, or molar pregnancy. The primary outcome was the healthcare burden for patients seen in an EPAC compared to patients never seen in an EPAC. Healthcare burden was defined as the total number of encounters and the average time spent in the healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We obtained data from 241 patients between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients never seen in EPAC were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (52% vs 30%, p&lt;0.001), have public or no insurance (59% vs 25%, p&lt;0.001), and report a non-English primary language (33% vs 10%, p&lt;0.001) compared with patients seen in an EPAC. The median (range) total number of healthcare encounters was 4 (2, 5.5) and 3 (2,5) in the EPAC and non-EPAC groups, respectively (p=0.3). The mean in-person healthcare encounter time (hours) was significantly higher in the non-EPAC group (327 vs 120, p&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients never seen in an EPAC were more likely to have socioeconomic and language barriers compared to those seen in an EPAC. Increasing access to expedited evaluation and management of early pregnancy complications may improve patients’ healthcare experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10762,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 110630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PATIENT OUTCOMES WITH EARLY PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS AFTER EXPOSURE TO AN EARLY PREGNANCY ASSESSMENT CLINIC\",\"authors\":\"SI Amaya,&nbsp;J Zhang,&nbsp;A Chen,&nbsp;SK Mulwa,&nbsp;E Booker,&nbsp;TS Gémesi,&nbsp;A Henkel,&nbsp;K Shaw,&nbsp;J Shorter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>We aimed to evaluate the healthcare burden experienced by patients with early pregnancy complications seen in an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC) and those never seen in an EPAC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients 18 years and older who presented during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with a complication including vaginal bleeding or pain, early pregnancy loss (EPL), pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), ectopic, or molar pregnancy. The primary outcome was the healthcare burden for patients seen in an EPAC compared to patients never seen in an EPAC. Healthcare burden was defined as the total number of encounters and the average time spent in the healthcare system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We obtained data from 241 patients between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients never seen in EPAC were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (52% vs 30%, p&lt;0.001), have public or no insurance (59% vs 25%, p&lt;0.001), and report a non-English primary language (33% vs 10%, p&lt;0.001) compared with patients seen in an EPAC. The median (range) total number of healthcare encounters was 4 (2, 5.5) and 3 (2,5) in the EPAC and non-EPAC groups, respectively (p=0.3). The mean in-person healthcare encounter time (hours) was significantly higher in the non-EPAC group (327 vs 120, p&lt;0.001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients never seen in an EPAC were more likely to have socioeconomic and language barriers compared to those seen in an EPAC. Increasing access to expedited evaluation and management of early pregnancy complications may improve patients’ healthcare experience.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003251\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782424003251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法 我们开展了一项回顾性队列研究,对妊娠 12 周内出现阴道出血或疼痛、早孕丢失(EPL)、位置不明妊娠(PUL)、异位妊娠或臼齿妊娠等并发症的 18 岁及以上患者进行了评估。主要结果是与从未在 EPAC 就诊的患者相比,在 EPAC 就诊的患者的医疗负担。医疗负担定义为就诊总次数和在医疗系统中花费的平均时间。结果我们获得了2021年1月至2022年6月期间241名患者的数据。与在EPAC就诊的患者相比,从未在EPAC就诊的患者更有可能是西班牙裔(52% vs 30%,p<0.001)、拥有公共保险或无保险(59% vs 25%,p<0.001),并且报告的主要语言为非英语(33% vs 10%,p<0.001)。在 EPAC 组和非 EPAC 组中,总就诊次数的中位数(范围)分别为 4(2,5.5)次和 3(2,5)次(p=0.3)。结论与在 EPAC 就诊的患者相比,从未在 EPAC 就诊的患者更有可能存在社会经济和语言障碍。增加早期妊娠并发症的快速评估和管理可改善患者的医疗体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PATIENT OUTCOMES WITH EARLY PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS AFTER EXPOSURE TO AN EARLY PREGNANCY ASSESSMENT CLINIC

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the healthcare burden experienced by patients with early pregnancy complications seen in an early pregnancy assessment clinic (EPAC) and those never seen in an EPAC.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients 18 years and older who presented during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy with a complication including vaginal bleeding or pain, early pregnancy loss (EPL), pregnancy of unknown location (PUL), ectopic, or molar pregnancy. The primary outcome was the healthcare burden for patients seen in an EPAC compared to patients never seen in an EPAC. Healthcare burden was defined as the total number of encounters and the average time spent in the healthcare system.

Results

We obtained data from 241 patients between January 2021 and June 2022. Patients never seen in EPAC were more likely to be of Hispanic ethnicity (52% vs 30%, p<0.001), have public or no insurance (59% vs 25%, p<0.001), and report a non-English primary language (33% vs 10%, p<0.001) compared with patients seen in an EPAC. The median (range) total number of healthcare encounters was 4 (2, 5.5) and 3 (2,5) in the EPAC and non-EPAC groups, respectively (p=0.3). The mean in-person healthcare encounter time (hours) was significantly higher in the non-EPAC group (327 vs 120, p<0.001).

Conclusions

Patients never seen in an EPAC were more likely to have socioeconomic and language barriers compared to those seen in an EPAC. Increasing access to expedited evaluation and management of early pregnancy complications may improve patients’ healthcare experience.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Contraception
Contraception 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
17.20%
发文量
211
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Contraception has an open access mirror journal Contraception: X, sharing the same aims and scope, editorial team, submission system and rigorous peer review. The journal Contraception wishes to advance reproductive health through the rapid publication of the best and most interesting new scholarship regarding contraception and related fields such as abortion. The journal welcomes manuscripts from investigators working in the laboratory, clinical and social sciences, as well as public health and health professions education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信