{"title":"用经验知识揭示随机基本图:建模、局限性和未来方向","authors":"Yuan-Zheng Lei, Yaobang Gong, Xianfeng Terry Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Traffic flow modeling relies heavily on fundamental diagrams. However, deterministic fundamental diagrams, such as single or multi-regime models, cannot capture the underlying uncertainty in traffic flow. To address this limitation, this study proposes a non-parametric Gaussian process model to formulate the stochastic fundamental diagram. Unlike parametric models, the non-parametric approach is insensitive to parameters, flexible, and widely applicable. The computational complexity and high memory requirements of Gaussian process regression are also mitigated by introducing sparse Gaussian process regression. This study also examines the impact of incorporating empirical knowledge into the prior of the stochastic fundamental diagram model and assesses whether such knowledge can enhance the model’s robustness and accuracy. By using several well-known single-regime fundamental diagram models as priors and testing the model’s performance with different sampling methods on real-world data, this study finds that empirical knowledge benefits the model only when small inducing samples are used with a relatively clean and large dataset. In other cases, a purely data-driven approach is sufficient to estimate and describe the density–speed relationship pattern.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54417,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unraveling stochastic fundamental diagrams with empirical knowledge: Modeling, limitations, and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Yuan-Zheng Lei, Yaobang Gong, Xianfeng Terry Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trc.2024.104851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Traffic flow modeling relies heavily on fundamental diagrams. However, deterministic fundamental diagrams, such as single or multi-regime models, cannot capture the underlying uncertainty in traffic flow. To address this limitation, this study proposes a non-parametric Gaussian process model to formulate the stochastic fundamental diagram. Unlike parametric models, the non-parametric approach is insensitive to parameters, flexible, and widely applicable. The computational complexity and high memory requirements of Gaussian process regression are also mitigated by introducing sparse Gaussian process regression. This study also examines the impact of incorporating empirical knowledge into the prior of the stochastic fundamental diagram model and assesses whether such knowledge can enhance the model’s robustness and accuracy. By using several well-known single-regime fundamental diagram models as priors and testing the model’s performance with different sampling methods on real-world data, this study finds that empirical knowledge benefits the model only when small inducing samples are used with a relatively clean and large dataset. In other cases, a purely data-driven approach is sufficient to estimate and describe the density–speed relationship pattern.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003723\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X24003723","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Unraveling stochastic fundamental diagrams with empirical knowledge: Modeling, limitations, and future directions
Traffic flow modeling relies heavily on fundamental diagrams. However, deterministic fundamental diagrams, such as single or multi-regime models, cannot capture the underlying uncertainty in traffic flow. To address this limitation, this study proposes a non-parametric Gaussian process model to formulate the stochastic fundamental diagram. Unlike parametric models, the non-parametric approach is insensitive to parameters, flexible, and widely applicable. The computational complexity and high memory requirements of Gaussian process regression are also mitigated by introducing sparse Gaussian process regression. This study also examines the impact of incorporating empirical knowledge into the prior of the stochastic fundamental diagram model and assesses whether such knowledge can enhance the model’s robustness and accuracy. By using several well-known single-regime fundamental diagram models as priors and testing the model’s performance with different sampling methods on real-world data, this study finds that empirical knowledge benefits the model only when small inducing samples are used with a relatively clean and large dataset. In other cases, a purely data-driven approach is sufficient to estimate and describe the density–speed relationship pattern.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research: Part C (TR_C) is dedicated to showcasing high-quality, scholarly research that delves into the development, applications, and implications of transportation systems and emerging technologies. Our focus lies not solely on individual technologies, but rather on their broader implications for the planning, design, operation, control, maintenance, and rehabilitation of transportation systems, services, and components. In essence, the intellectual core of the journal revolves around the transportation aspect rather than the technology itself. We actively encourage the integration of quantitative methods from diverse fields such as operations research, control systems, complex networks, computer science, and artificial intelligence. Join us in exploring the intersection of transportation systems and emerging technologies to drive innovation and progress in the field.