{"title":"整体式桥墩桥梁的土体变形和侧压力棘轮现象综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of soil deformation and lateral pressure ratcheting phenomena in integral abutment bridges\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of soil deformation and lateral pressure ratcheting phenomena in integral abutment bridges
Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.