整体式桥墩桥梁的土体变形和侧压力棘轮现象综述

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
{"title":"整体式桥墩桥梁的土体变形和侧压力棘轮现象综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of soil deformation and lateral pressure ratcheting phenomena in integral abutment bridges\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56013,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002095\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

整体式桥梁作为传统桥梁的一种无接缝设计替代方案,在经济和结构方面都具有巨大的潜在优势。然而,由于梁与桥墩接口处采用整体连接,上部结构的纵向变形现在必须由引桥回填土和地基周围土壤的刚度来承担。因此,除了交通荷载外,整体式桥梁引桥还承受着昼夜和季节性热变化造成的长期循环荷载。这导致了两种渐进的岩土工程现象:桥台与土壤界面的横向被动压力升级以及引桥附近的累积变形。在过去二十年中,对引桥回填土与桥墩之间的相互作用进行了多次研究。然而,以往有关整体式桥梁的综述并未全面讨论这两个复杂岩土工程问题的理论方面。因此,本文讨论了通过控制分析观察到的应力棘轮的长期响应,并与现场监测数据进行了比较。随后,还探讨了累积变形的发生以及与循环相互作用机制的相关性。然后介绍了地基设计选择和倾斜角度对被动压力累积和土壤变形行为的影响。随后,比较了用于减轻回填土与基底相互作用影响的方法。从上述综述中可以看出,基于现有实验和现场调查的结果尚不足以建立预测整体式桥梁引桥回填土在各种荷载条件下的长期响应所需的分析模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A review of soil deformation and lateral pressure ratcheting phenomena in integral abutment bridges
Integral bridges have been proposed as a jointless design alternative to the traditional counterparts, possessing copious potential economic and structural advantages. However, due to the monolithic connection at the girder-abutment interface, longitudinal deformations from the superstructure must now be accommodated by the stiffness of the approach backfill and soil surrounding the foundation. Consequently, in addition to traffic loads, integral bridge approaches are subjected to long-term, cyclic loading due to diurnal and seasonal thermal variations. This has resulted in two progressive geotechnical phenomena: an escalation of lateral passive pressures at the abutment-soil interface and accumulated deformations near the bridge approach. Over the last two decades, several investigations on the approach backfill-abutment interaction have been carried out. However, previous reviews on integral bridges have not comprehensively discussed the theoretical aspects of these two complex geotechnical issues. Hence, this paper presents a discussion on the long-term response of stress ratcheting observed from controlled analyses, along with a comparison to that from field monitoring data. Subsequently, the occurrence of accumulated deformations, along with a correlation to the mechanism of the cyclic interaction is explored. The effects of foundation design choice and skew angle on the passive pressure accumulation and soil deformation behavior are then presented. Subsequently, approaches used to mitigate the effects of the backfill-abutment interaction are compared. From this review, it is apparent that outcomes based on available experimental and field investigations are yet inadequate to develop analytical models required to predict the long-term response of integral bridge approach backfills under various loading conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信