用于增强车辆跟踪和分析的机器学习技术比较分析

Q1 Engineering
Seema Rani, Sandeep Dalal
{"title":"用于增强车辆跟踪和分析的机器学习技术比较分析","authors":"Seema Rani,&nbsp;Sandeep Dalal","doi":"10.1016/j.treng.2024.100271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The past few years have seen a marvellous growth in technology and science. This rapid improvement has proven to be a blessing, making human life easier. Technological developments such as autonomous driving systems and electric cars have made it easier to travel in a dependable and economical manner, satisfying the increasing need for convenient and environmentally friendly travel. However, the increase in traffic has led to a surge in accidents and road casualties. Despite efforts to enhance automobile design and traffic control, there remains a significant need for implementing a system for vehicle tracking, accident detection, and notification. Delays in information and unfulfilled medical needs often result in the loss of lives following accidents. This study reviews and compares different automatic accident detection and notification systems that use accelerometers, vibration detectors, and GPS technology to notify registered contacts of an accident's location via SMS or email. The analysis that follows will specifically look at the benefits, drawbacks, and future uses of various technologies that are used in these systems. In this study, different machine learning-based methods for improving the accuracy of car tracking and cutting down on reaction times in accident situations will be looked at and compared. For testing their usefulness, we used deep learning models like CNN, SVM, and YOLOv3 on a number of different datasets. According to our data, these methods greatly enhance the accuracy of spotting, with YOLOv3 showing the best level of accuracy. Furthermore, the study talks about the pros, cons, and possible future uses of these technologies. It stresses the need for more research into improving model performance in different situations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34480,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Engineering","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100271"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for enhanced vehicle tracking and analysis\",\"authors\":\"Seema Rani,&nbsp;Sandeep Dalal\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.treng.2024.100271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The past few years have seen a marvellous growth in technology and science. This rapid improvement has proven to be a blessing, making human life easier. Technological developments such as autonomous driving systems and electric cars have made it easier to travel in a dependable and economical manner, satisfying the increasing need for convenient and environmentally friendly travel. However, the increase in traffic has led to a surge in accidents and road casualties. Despite efforts to enhance automobile design and traffic control, there remains a significant need for implementing a system for vehicle tracking, accident detection, and notification. Delays in information and unfulfilled medical needs often result in the loss of lives following accidents. This study reviews and compares different automatic accident detection and notification systems that use accelerometers, vibration detectors, and GPS technology to notify registered contacts of an accident's location via SMS or email. The analysis that follows will specifically look at the benefits, drawbacks, and future uses of various technologies that are used in these systems. In this study, different machine learning-based methods for improving the accuracy of car tracking and cutting down on reaction times in accident situations will be looked at and compared. For testing their usefulness, we used deep learning models like CNN, SVM, and YOLOv3 on a number of different datasets. According to our data, these methods greatly enhance the accuracy of spotting, with YOLOv3 showing the best level of accuracy. Furthermore, the study talks about the pros, cons, and possible future uses of these technologies. It stresses the need for more research into improving model performance in different situations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000460\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666691X24000460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去几年中,技术和科学的发展令人惊叹。事实证明,这种快速进步是一种福气,使人类的生活变得更加轻松。自动驾驶系统和电动汽车等技术的发展使人们能够以可靠和经济的方式出行,满足了人们对便捷和环保出行日益增长的需求。然而,交通流量的增加导致事故和道路伤亡人数激增。尽管人们在努力改进汽车设计和交通管制,但对车辆跟踪、事故检测和通知系统的实施仍有很大需求。信息延迟和医疗需求得不到满足往往会在事故发生后导致生命损失。本研究回顾并比较了不同的事故自动检测和通知系统,这些系统使用加速度计、振动探测器和 GPS 技术,通过短信或电子邮件通知注册联系人事故发生的位置。接下来的分析将具体探讨这些系统中使用的各种技术的优点、缺点和未来用途。在本研究中,我们将对不同的基于机器学习的方法进行研究和比较,以提高汽车跟踪的准确性并缩短事故情况下的反应时间。为了测试这些方法的实用性,我们在一些不同的数据集上使用了 CNN、SVM 和 YOLOv3 等深度学习模型。根据我们的数据,这些方法大大提高了发现的准确性,其中 YOLOv3 的准确性最高。此外,研究还谈到了这些技术的利弊和未来可能的用途。它强调了在不同情况下提高模型性能的更多研究需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of machine learning techniques for enhanced vehicle tracking and analysis
The past few years have seen a marvellous growth in technology and science. This rapid improvement has proven to be a blessing, making human life easier. Technological developments such as autonomous driving systems and electric cars have made it easier to travel in a dependable and economical manner, satisfying the increasing need for convenient and environmentally friendly travel. However, the increase in traffic has led to a surge in accidents and road casualties. Despite efforts to enhance automobile design and traffic control, there remains a significant need for implementing a system for vehicle tracking, accident detection, and notification. Delays in information and unfulfilled medical needs often result in the loss of lives following accidents. This study reviews and compares different automatic accident detection and notification systems that use accelerometers, vibration detectors, and GPS technology to notify registered contacts of an accident's location via SMS or email. The analysis that follows will specifically look at the benefits, drawbacks, and future uses of various technologies that are used in these systems. In this study, different machine learning-based methods for improving the accuracy of car tracking and cutting down on reaction times in accident situations will be looked at and compared. For testing their usefulness, we used deep learning models like CNN, SVM, and YOLOv3 on a number of different datasets. According to our data, these methods greatly enhance the accuracy of spotting, with YOLOv3 showing the best level of accuracy. Furthermore, the study talks about the pros, cons, and possible future uses of these technologies. It stresses the need for more research into improving model performance in different situations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Engineering
Transportation Engineering Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
90 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信