{"title":"程序准确性的新权利:刑事诉讼中数字证据的治理模式","authors":"Radina (Adi) Stoykova","doi":"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper motivates and studies the feasibility of a new digital right to procedural accuracy (RPA) for digital evidence processing in criminal investigations. The need to guarantee a new principle of procedural accuracy under Art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is based on the concern that digital forensic science and AI technology have a significant impact on individuals’ rights in criminal proceedings, which are neither coherently nor comprehensively addressed. The personal and material scope of RPA are examined and include: <em>(i)</em> protection against unreliable digital evidence processing; <em>(ii)</em> right to access the chain of evidence, explanation, and forensic assistance; and <em>(iii)</em> the right to participate in the determinative stages of the digital evidence processing. Limitations of the RPA are also discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51516,"journal":{"name":"Computer Law & Security Review","volume":"55 ","pages":"Article 106040"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A New Right to Procedural Accuracy: A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings\",\"authors\":\"Radina (Adi) Stoykova\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper motivates and studies the feasibility of a new digital right to procedural accuracy (RPA) for digital evidence processing in criminal investigations. The need to guarantee a new principle of procedural accuracy under Art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is based on the concern that digital forensic science and AI technology have a significant impact on individuals’ rights in criminal proceedings, which are neither coherently nor comprehensively addressed. The personal and material scope of RPA are examined and include: <em>(i)</em> protection against unreliable digital evidence processing; <em>(ii)</em> right to access the chain of evidence, explanation, and forensic assistance; and <em>(iii)</em> the right to participate in the determinative stages of the digital evidence processing. Limitations of the RPA are also discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"volume\":\"55 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106040\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computer Law & Security Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Law & Security Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267364924001067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文探讨了在刑事调查数字证据处理过程中新的数字程序准确权(RPA)的动机和可行性。根据《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR)第 6 条,有必要保障新的程序准确性原则。欧洲人权公约》(European Convention on Human Rights, ECHR)第 6 条规定的新的程序准确性原则的必要性,是基于对数字法医学和人工智能技术在刑事诉讼中对个人权利产生重大影响的担忧,而这些权利既没有得到连贯一致的处理,也没有得到全面的处理。对 RPA 的个人和物质范围进行了研究,其中包括(i) 防止不可靠的数字证据处理;(ii) 获取证据链、解释和法医协助的权利;(iii) 参与数字证据处理决定性阶段的权利。此外,还讨论了 RPA 的局限性。
A New Right to Procedural Accuracy: A Governance Model for Digital Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
This paper motivates and studies the feasibility of a new digital right to procedural accuracy (RPA) for digital evidence processing in criminal investigations. The need to guarantee a new principle of procedural accuracy under Art. 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is based on the concern that digital forensic science and AI technology have a significant impact on individuals’ rights in criminal proceedings, which are neither coherently nor comprehensively addressed. The personal and material scope of RPA are examined and include: (i) protection against unreliable digital evidence processing; (ii) right to access the chain of evidence, explanation, and forensic assistance; and (iii) the right to participate in the determinative stages of the digital evidence processing. Limitations of the RPA are also discussed.
期刊介绍:
CLSR publishes refereed academic and practitioner papers on topics such as Web 2.0, IT security, Identity management, ID cards, RFID, interference with privacy, Internet law, telecoms regulation, online broadcasting, intellectual property, software law, e-commerce, outsourcing, data protection, EU policy, freedom of information, computer security and many other topics. In addition it provides a regular update on European Union developments, national news from more than 20 jurisdictions in both Europe and the Pacific Rim. It is looking for papers within the subject area that display good quality legal analysis and new lines of legal thought or policy development that go beyond mere description of the subject area, however accurate that may be.