Elizabeth Pelletier , Scott W. Allard , Julia Karon , Taryn W. Morrissey
{"title":"早期保育和教育中心在空间上的不平等","authors":"Elizabeth Pelletier , Scott W. Allard , Julia Karon , Taryn W. Morrissey","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.09.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Given the importance of early care and education (ECE) programs for children's development and parents’ labor force participation, it is critical to ensure communities — particularly those home to historically marginalized populations — have predictable and equitable access to programming and services. Yet, there are few useful data resources and thus relatively little research examining variation in local access to ECE programs. In this article, we examine county-level disparities in participation in and availability of ECE centers by child poverty rate, racial and ethnic composition, and urban-rural geography using a unique national dataset of county-level ECE program enrollment and expenditures from 2000 to 2019. Measures of ECE access in these data reflect a mix of publicly provided and funded programs, as well as privately-run programs that may be operated by nonprofit or for-profit entities. Findings suggest that public ECE per capita enrollment is higher in rural than urban counties, whereas private ECE program enrollment appears more highly concentrated in urban counties. Counties with higher child poverty rates also have lower enrollment rates at private ECE centers compared to counties with lower child poverty rates. We find mixed results when comparing public (e.g., public preschool, Head Start) and private ECE enrollment across counties by racial and ethnic composition. Finally, we examine year-over-year volatility in ECE enrollment and expenditures and find that public ECE programs are more stable compared to private ECE programming, which may promote equity in ECE stability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"70 ","pages":"Pages 120-132"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The spatial inequality of early care and education centers\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Pelletier , Scott W. Allard , Julia Karon , Taryn W. Morrissey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecresq.2024.09.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Given the importance of early care and education (ECE) programs for children's development and parents’ labor force participation, it is critical to ensure communities — particularly those home to historically marginalized populations — have predictable and equitable access to programming and services. Yet, there are few useful data resources and thus relatively little research examining variation in local access to ECE programs. In this article, we examine county-level disparities in participation in and availability of ECE centers by child poverty rate, racial and ethnic composition, and urban-rural geography using a unique national dataset of county-level ECE program enrollment and expenditures from 2000 to 2019. Measures of ECE access in these data reflect a mix of publicly provided and funded programs, as well as privately-run programs that may be operated by nonprofit or for-profit entities. Findings suggest that public ECE per capita enrollment is higher in rural than urban counties, whereas private ECE program enrollment appears more highly concentrated in urban counties. Counties with higher child poverty rates also have lower enrollment rates at private ECE centers compared to counties with lower child poverty rates. We find mixed results when comparing public (e.g., public preschool, Head Start) and private ECE enrollment across counties by racial and ethnic composition. Finally, we examine year-over-year volatility in ECE enrollment and expenditures and find that public ECE programs are more stable compared to private ECE programming, which may promote equity in ECE stability.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 120-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Research Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624001327\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200624001327","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The spatial inequality of early care and education centers
Given the importance of early care and education (ECE) programs for children's development and parents’ labor force participation, it is critical to ensure communities — particularly those home to historically marginalized populations — have predictable and equitable access to programming and services. Yet, there are few useful data resources and thus relatively little research examining variation in local access to ECE programs. In this article, we examine county-level disparities in participation in and availability of ECE centers by child poverty rate, racial and ethnic composition, and urban-rural geography using a unique national dataset of county-level ECE program enrollment and expenditures from 2000 to 2019. Measures of ECE access in these data reflect a mix of publicly provided and funded programs, as well as privately-run programs that may be operated by nonprofit or for-profit entities. Findings suggest that public ECE per capita enrollment is higher in rural than urban counties, whereas private ECE program enrollment appears more highly concentrated in urban counties. Counties with higher child poverty rates also have lower enrollment rates at private ECE centers compared to counties with lower child poverty rates. We find mixed results when comparing public (e.g., public preschool, Head Start) and private ECE enrollment across counties by racial and ethnic composition. Finally, we examine year-over-year volatility in ECE enrollment and expenditures and find that public ECE programs are more stable compared to private ECE programming, which may promote equity in ECE stability.
期刊介绍:
For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.