Khleef Almutairi , Samuel Morillas , Pedro Latorre-Carmona , Makan Dansoko , María José Gacto
{"title":"用于显示特征的机器学习方法比较分析","authors":"Khleef Almutairi , Samuel Morillas , Pedro Latorre-Carmona , Makan Dansoko , María José Gacto","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper explores the application of various machine-learning methods for characterizing displays of technologies LCD, OLED, and QLED to achieve accurate color reproduction. These models are formed from input (device-dependent RGB data) and output (device-independent XYZ coordinates) data obtained from three different displays. Training and test datasets are built using <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span> data measured directly from the displays and corresponding <span><math><mrow><mi>X</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>Z</mi></mrow></math></span> coordinates measured with a high-precision colorimeter. A key aspect of this research is the application fuzzy inference systems for building interpretable models. These models offer the advantage of not only achieving good performance in color reproduction, but also providing physical insights into the relationships between the <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span> inputs and the resulting <span><math><mrow><mi>X</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>Z</mi></mrow></math></span> outputs. This interpretability allows for a deeper understanding of the display’s behavior. Furthermore, we compare the performance of fuzzy models with other popular machine-learning approaches, including those based on neural networks and decision trees. By evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each method, we aim to identify the most effective approach for display characterization. The effectiveness of each method is assessed by its ability to accurately reproduce and display colors, as measured by the <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>00</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> visual error metric. Our findings indicate that the Fuzzy Modeling and Identification (FMID) method is particularly effective, allowing for an optimal balance between high accuracy and interpretability. Its competitive performance across all display types, combined with its valuable interpretability, provides insights for potential future calibration and optimization strategies. The results will shed light on whether machine learning methods offer an advantage over traditional physical models, particularly in scenarios with limited data. Additionally, the study will contribute to the understanding of the interpretability benefits offered by fuzzy inference systems in the context of LCD display characterization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102849"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative analysis of machine learning methods for display characterization\",\"authors\":\"Khleef Almutairi , Samuel Morillas , Pedro Latorre-Carmona , Makan Dansoko , María José Gacto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper explores the application of various machine-learning methods for characterizing displays of technologies LCD, OLED, and QLED to achieve accurate color reproduction. These models are formed from input (device-dependent RGB data) and output (device-independent XYZ coordinates) data obtained from three different displays. Training and test datasets are built using <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span> data measured directly from the displays and corresponding <span><math><mrow><mi>X</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>Z</mi></mrow></math></span> coordinates measured with a high-precision colorimeter. A key aspect of this research is the application fuzzy inference systems for building interpretable models. These models offer the advantage of not only achieving good performance in color reproduction, but also providing physical insights into the relationships between the <span><math><mrow><mi>R</mi><mi>G</mi><mi>B</mi></mrow></math></span> inputs and the resulting <span><math><mrow><mi>X</mi><mi>Y</mi><mi>Z</mi></mrow></math></span> outputs. This interpretability allows for a deeper understanding of the display’s behavior. Furthermore, we compare the performance of fuzzy models with other popular machine-learning approaches, including those based on neural networks and decision trees. By evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each method, we aim to identify the most effective approach for display characterization. The effectiveness of each method is assessed by its ability to accurately reproduce and display colors, as measured by the <span><math><mrow><mi>Δ</mi><msub><mrow><mi>E</mi></mrow><mrow><mn>00</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> visual error metric. Our findings indicate that the Fuzzy Modeling and Identification (FMID) method is particularly effective, allowing for an optimal balance between high accuracy and interpretability. Its competitive performance across all display types, combined with its valuable interpretability, provides insights for potential future calibration and optimization strategies. The results will shed light on whether machine learning methods offer an advantage over traditional physical models, particularly in scenarios with limited data. Additionally, the study will contribute to the understanding of the interpretability benefits offered by fuzzy inference systems in the context of LCD display characterization.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50570,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Displays\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Displays\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224002130\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224002130","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparative analysis of machine learning methods for display characterization
This paper explores the application of various machine-learning methods for characterizing displays of technologies LCD, OLED, and QLED to achieve accurate color reproduction. These models are formed from input (device-dependent RGB data) and output (device-independent XYZ coordinates) data obtained from three different displays. Training and test datasets are built using data measured directly from the displays and corresponding coordinates measured with a high-precision colorimeter. A key aspect of this research is the application fuzzy inference systems for building interpretable models. These models offer the advantage of not only achieving good performance in color reproduction, but also providing physical insights into the relationships between the inputs and the resulting outputs. This interpretability allows for a deeper understanding of the display’s behavior. Furthermore, we compare the performance of fuzzy models with other popular machine-learning approaches, including those based on neural networks and decision trees. By evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of each method, we aim to identify the most effective approach for display characterization. The effectiveness of each method is assessed by its ability to accurately reproduce and display colors, as measured by the visual error metric. Our findings indicate that the Fuzzy Modeling and Identification (FMID) method is particularly effective, allowing for an optimal balance between high accuracy and interpretability. Its competitive performance across all display types, combined with its valuable interpretability, provides insights for potential future calibration and optimization strategies. The results will shed light on whether machine learning methods offer an advantage over traditional physical models, particularly in scenarios with limited data. Additionally, the study will contribute to the understanding of the interpretability benefits offered by fuzzy inference systems in the context of LCD display characterization.
期刊介绍:
Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface.
Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.