混凝土中纳米二氧化硅演变的多变量方差分析:强度和可持续性建模

Q2 Engineering
Ahmad Khalil Mohammed, Anas Zobih Jamil, Ahmed Salih Mohammed, A. M. T. Hassan
{"title":"混凝土中纳米二氧化硅演变的多变量方差分析:强度和可持续性建模","authors":"Ahmad Khalil Mohammed,&nbsp;Anas Zobih Jamil,&nbsp;Ahmed Salih Mohammed,&nbsp;A. M. T. Hassan","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01119-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This comprehensive research traces the evolution of concrete technology, focusing on nanotechnology, specifically nano-silica, as a highly promising avenue for enhancing concrete properties. The study systematically compares traditional concrete with nano-silica-reinforced concrete, shedding light on the pivotal roles of superplasticizers and nano-silica in determining compressive strength over a curing period ranging from 1 to 365 days. The analysis encompasses key factors such as the water-to-cement ratio, cement content (C), and content (S), gravel content (G), superplasticizer (SP), and Nano silica (NS), totaling 820 meticulously collected, analyzed, and modeled datasets.This research employs extensive datasets and diverse modeling techniques to predict compressive strength accurately. Key findings underscore the influence of the water-cement ratio and superplasticizers in traditional concrete, while nano-silica consistently interacts with other factors, except for curing time. The study presents numerical models for compressive strength estimation and contributes to sustainable construction practices. Utilizing statistical modeling, the research establishes optimal models with minimal root mean square error (RMSE). Correlation analysis reveals nuanced connections between traditional and nano-silica-containing concrete, with a marginal strength difference not exceeding 5 MPa. Various models, including nonlinear regression, full quadratic models, and an artificial neural network (ANN), are employed to predict compressive strength. Significantly, the study finds that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model consistently outperforms other models in predicting the compressive strength of conventional concrete, while the Full Quadratic (FQ) model exhibits remarkable consistency, especially in forecasting the strength of traditional concrete. Sensitivity analysis underscores the pivotal roles of factors such as water-cement ratio, cement content, and superplasticizer in influencing model accuracy. Notably, nano-silica, identified through sensitivity analysis, significantly contributes to predictive accuracy, highlighting its unique and influential role in shaping concrete strength. This research deepens our understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing nano-silica-infused concrete strength, emphasizing the necessity to consider multiple variables for precise predictions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 7","pages":"5393 - 5420"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multivariate analysis of variance in nano-silica in concrete evolution: modelling strength and sustainability\",\"authors\":\"Ahmad Khalil Mohammed,&nbsp;Anas Zobih Jamil,&nbsp;Ahmed Salih Mohammed,&nbsp;A. M. T. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s42107-024-01119-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This comprehensive research traces the evolution of concrete technology, focusing on nanotechnology, specifically nano-silica, as a highly promising avenue for enhancing concrete properties. The study systematically compares traditional concrete with nano-silica-reinforced concrete, shedding light on the pivotal roles of superplasticizers and nano-silica in determining compressive strength over a curing period ranging from 1 to 365 days. The analysis encompasses key factors such as the water-to-cement ratio, cement content (C), and content (S), gravel content (G), superplasticizer (SP), and Nano silica (NS), totaling 820 meticulously collected, analyzed, and modeled datasets.This research employs extensive datasets and diverse modeling techniques to predict compressive strength accurately. Key findings underscore the influence of the water-cement ratio and superplasticizers in traditional concrete, while nano-silica consistently interacts with other factors, except for curing time. The study presents numerical models for compressive strength estimation and contributes to sustainable construction practices. Utilizing statistical modeling, the research establishes optimal models with minimal root mean square error (RMSE). Correlation analysis reveals nuanced connections between traditional and nano-silica-containing concrete, with a marginal strength difference not exceeding 5 MPa. Various models, including nonlinear regression, full quadratic models, and an artificial neural network (ANN), are employed to predict compressive strength. Significantly, the study finds that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model consistently outperforms other models in predicting the compressive strength of conventional concrete, while the Full Quadratic (FQ) model exhibits remarkable consistency, especially in forecasting the strength of traditional concrete. Sensitivity analysis underscores the pivotal roles of factors such as water-cement ratio, cement content, and superplasticizer in influencing model accuracy. Notably, nano-silica, identified through sensitivity analysis, significantly contributes to predictive accuracy, highlighting its unique and influential role in shaping concrete strength. This research deepens our understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing nano-silica-infused concrete strength, emphasizing the necessity to consider multiple variables for precise predictions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"25 7\",\"pages\":\"5393 - 5420\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01119-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01119-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项综合研究追溯了混凝土技术的发展历程,重点关注纳米技术,特别是纳米二氧化硅,将其作为增强混凝土性能的一个极具前景的途径。研究系统地比较了传统混凝土和纳米二氧化硅加固混凝土,揭示了超塑化剂和纳米二氧化硅在 1 到 365 天的养护期内对抗压强度的决定性作用。分析包括水灰比、水泥含量 (C)、和含量 (S)、砂砾含量 (G)、超塑化剂 (SP) 和纳米二氧化硅 (NS) 等关键因素,共计 820 个精心收集、分析和建模的数据集。主要发现强调了传统混凝土中水灰比和超塑化剂的影响,而纳米二氧化硅则始终与其他因素相互作用,但养护时间除外。该研究提出了抗压强度估算的数值模型,有助于可持续建筑实践。通过统计建模,研究建立了均方根误差(RMSE)最小的最佳模型。相关分析揭示了传统混凝土与含纳米二氧化硅混凝土之间的细微联系,两者的边际强度差异不超过 5 兆帕。采用了各种模型,包括非线性回归模型、全二次方模型和人工神经网络 (ANN) 来预测抗压强度。值得注意的是,研究发现人工神经网络(ANN)模型在预测传统混凝土抗压强度方面始终优于其他模型,而全二次方(FQ)模型则表现出显著的一致性,尤其是在预测传统混凝土强度方面。敏感性分析强调了水灰比、水泥含量和超塑化剂等因素在影响模型准确性方面的关键作用。值得注意的是,通过灵敏度分析确定的纳米二氧化硅对预测准确性有显著贡献,突出了其在塑造混凝土强度方面独特而有影响力的作用。这项研究加深了我们对影响纳米二氧化硅注入混凝土强度的多方面因素的理解,强调了考虑多种变量以进行精确预测的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multivariate analysis of variance in nano-silica in concrete evolution: modelling strength and sustainability

This comprehensive research traces the evolution of concrete technology, focusing on nanotechnology, specifically nano-silica, as a highly promising avenue for enhancing concrete properties. The study systematically compares traditional concrete with nano-silica-reinforced concrete, shedding light on the pivotal roles of superplasticizers and nano-silica in determining compressive strength over a curing period ranging from 1 to 365 days. The analysis encompasses key factors such as the water-to-cement ratio, cement content (C), and content (S), gravel content (G), superplasticizer (SP), and Nano silica (NS), totaling 820 meticulously collected, analyzed, and modeled datasets.This research employs extensive datasets and diverse modeling techniques to predict compressive strength accurately. Key findings underscore the influence of the water-cement ratio and superplasticizers in traditional concrete, while nano-silica consistently interacts with other factors, except for curing time. The study presents numerical models for compressive strength estimation and contributes to sustainable construction practices. Utilizing statistical modeling, the research establishes optimal models with minimal root mean square error (RMSE). Correlation analysis reveals nuanced connections between traditional and nano-silica-containing concrete, with a marginal strength difference not exceeding 5 MPa. Various models, including nonlinear regression, full quadratic models, and an artificial neural network (ANN), are employed to predict compressive strength. Significantly, the study finds that the Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model consistently outperforms other models in predicting the compressive strength of conventional concrete, while the Full Quadratic (FQ) model exhibits remarkable consistency, especially in forecasting the strength of traditional concrete. Sensitivity analysis underscores the pivotal roles of factors such as water-cement ratio, cement content, and superplasticizer in influencing model accuracy. Notably, nano-silica, identified through sensitivity analysis, significantly contributes to predictive accuracy, highlighting its unique and influential role in shaping concrete strength. This research deepens our understanding of the multifaceted factors influencing nano-silica-infused concrete strength, emphasizing the necessity to consider multiple variables for precise predictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信