Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud
{"title":"混合发电厂的最佳能源调度管理系统:光伏-电网-电池-柴油发电机-抽水蓄能","authors":"Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3470652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2 \n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\n/24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"143307-143326"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703070","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Optimal Energy Dispatch Management System for Hybrid Power Plants: PV-Grid-Battery-Diesel Generator-Pumped Hydro Storage\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Ahmed;Rashid Al-Abri;Hassan Yousef;Ahmed M. Massoud\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3470652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2 \\n<inline-formula> <tex-math>${\\\\$}$ </tex-math></inline-formula>\\n/24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"143307-143326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703070\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703070/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703070/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Optimal Energy Dispatch Management System for Hybrid Power Plants: PV-Grid-Battery-Diesel Generator-Pumped Hydro Storage
Effective real-time energy management strategies are crucial for optimising hybrid power plants, particularly when challenged with integrating Renewable Energy Sources (RESs) and managing their intermittent nature. This paper presents a comprehensive energy management framework holding real-time optimisation for HPP. The practical implications of this research are significant, as it provides a roadmap for seamlessly integrating RESs with Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs) in Hybrid Power Plants (HPPs) to minimise cost while meeting daily household energy demands. Furthermore, it demonstrates how diesel generators (DGs) can be incorporated into the HPP’s energy management system while minimising carbon emissions. An Energy Dispatch Engine (EDE) is introduced to control HPPs that combine PV, BESS, DG and Pumped Hydro Storage (PHS). Two optimisation approaches are used, namely, Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) and Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming (SDDP). The system leverages load and RES power data while considering State-of-Charge (SoC) constraints to manage battery health proactively. Optimising discharge and charge profiles of the BESS, with the overarching goal of minimising the total cost of satisfying daily load demand, is an objective. Various tariff schemes were explored to assess the presented EDE. Our testing demonstrates that the SDDP approach consistently results in lower total costs than MILP. The total cost for the MILP method, where the system with PHS incurs higher costs (219.8
${\$}$
/24h) than the total cost for the SDDP method, where the system with PHS system (180
${\$}$
/24h). The cost of CO2 emissions was found to be lower in the case of SDDP, amounting to 8.3
${\$}$
/24h for a total emission of 160 kg. In contrast, the MILP approach resulted in a higher CO2 cost of 10.2
${\$}$
/24h for a total emission of 200 kg. This suggests that SDDP is more cost-effective in terms of reducing CO2 emissions.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.