Ying-Yi Hong;Dylan Josh Domingo Lopez;Yun-Yuan Wang
{"title":"使用混合量子神经网络进行太阳辐照度预测:基于 GPU 的工作流开发平台比较","authors":"Ying-Yi Hong;Dylan Josh Domingo Lopez;Yun-Yuan Wang","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3472053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern renewable power operations can be enhanced by integrating deep neural networks, particularly for forecasting solar irradiance. Recent advancements in quantum computing have shown potential improvements in classical deep neural networks. However, current challenges with quantum hardware, such as susceptibility to noise and decoherence, pose risks to its practicality. Hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs) are found to mitigate these issues, especially when integrated with graphics processing unit (GPU)-based pipelines. This paper presents a comparative study of different software platforms for developing HQNNs, using multi-location very short-term solar irradiance forecasting as an example. A classical benchmark model is initially designed based on statistical analysis of a 10-minute resolution solar irradiance dataset, with its parameters further optimized using Bayesian Optimization. The experimental design of this paper includes a loss comparison between classical neural networks and HQNNs across different seasons and a performance comparison between Pennylane, Torchquantum, and CUDA Quantum (CUDA-Q) as HQNN development platforms. Experimental results show that HQNNs achieve up to a 92.30% improvement in testing loss compared to classical neural networks. Regarding HQNN development platforms, Pennylane shows an 81.54% testing loss reduction from classical models, Torchquantum shows a 90.34% improvement, and CUDA-Q shows a 92.30% improvement in testing loss. Implementing hardware acceleration libraries for GPU-based state vector simulation demonstrates an approximate 275% speedup in average latency per epoch, a 218% speedup in inference time, and a 10.20% improvement in testing loss compared to CPU-based simulations. CUDA-Q achieves a training time 2.7 times shorter and an inference time 2.9 times shorter compared to Pennylane, while it is 32.3 times faster in training and 31 times faster in inference compared to Torchquantum.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"12 ","pages":"145079-145094"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Solar Irradiance Forecasting Using a Hybrid Quantum Neural Network: A Comparison on GPU-Based Workflow Development Platforms\",\"authors\":\"Ying-Yi Hong;Dylan Josh Domingo Lopez;Yun-Yuan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3472053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern renewable power operations can be enhanced by integrating deep neural networks, particularly for forecasting solar irradiance. Recent advancements in quantum computing have shown potential improvements in classical deep neural networks. However, current challenges with quantum hardware, such as susceptibility to noise and decoherence, pose risks to its practicality. Hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs) are found to mitigate these issues, especially when integrated with graphics processing unit (GPU)-based pipelines. This paper presents a comparative study of different software platforms for developing HQNNs, using multi-location very short-term solar irradiance forecasting as an example. A classical benchmark model is initially designed based on statistical analysis of a 10-minute resolution solar irradiance dataset, with its parameters further optimized using Bayesian Optimization. The experimental design of this paper includes a loss comparison between classical neural networks and HQNNs across different seasons and a performance comparison between Pennylane, Torchquantum, and CUDA Quantum (CUDA-Q) as HQNN development platforms. Experimental results show that HQNNs achieve up to a 92.30% improvement in testing loss compared to classical neural networks. Regarding HQNN development platforms, Pennylane shows an 81.54% testing loss reduction from classical models, Torchquantum shows a 90.34% improvement, and CUDA-Q shows a 92.30% improvement in testing loss. Implementing hardware acceleration libraries for GPU-based state vector simulation demonstrates an approximate 275% speedup in average latency per epoch, a 218% speedup in inference time, and a 10.20% improvement in testing loss compared to CPU-based simulations. CUDA-Q achieves a training time 2.7 times shorter and an inference time 2.9 times shorter compared to Pennylane, while it is 32.3 times faster in training and 31 times faster in inference compared to Torchquantum.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Access\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"145079-145094\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10703035\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Access\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703035/\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10703035/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Solar Irradiance Forecasting Using a Hybrid Quantum Neural Network: A Comparison on GPU-Based Workflow Development Platforms
Modern renewable power operations can be enhanced by integrating deep neural networks, particularly for forecasting solar irradiance. Recent advancements in quantum computing have shown potential improvements in classical deep neural networks. However, current challenges with quantum hardware, such as susceptibility to noise and decoherence, pose risks to its practicality. Hybrid quantum neural networks (HQNNs) are found to mitigate these issues, especially when integrated with graphics processing unit (GPU)-based pipelines. This paper presents a comparative study of different software platforms for developing HQNNs, using multi-location very short-term solar irradiance forecasting as an example. A classical benchmark model is initially designed based on statistical analysis of a 10-minute resolution solar irradiance dataset, with its parameters further optimized using Bayesian Optimization. The experimental design of this paper includes a loss comparison between classical neural networks and HQNNs across different seasons and a performance comparison between Pennylane, Torchquantum, and CUDA Quantum (CUDA-Q) as HQNN development platforms. Experimental results show that HQNNs achieve up to a 92.30% improvement in testing loss compared to classical neural networks. Regarding HQNN development platforms, Pennylane shows an 81.54% testing loss reduction from classical models, Torchquantum shows a 90.34% improvement, and CUDA-Q shows a 92.30% improvement in testing loss. Implementing hardware acceleration libraries for GPU-based state vector simulation demonstrates an approximate 275% speedup in average latency per epoch, a 218% speedup in inference time, and a 10.20% improvement in testing loss compared to CPU-based simulations. CUDA-Q achieves a training time 2.7 times shorter and an inference time 2.9 times shorter compared to Pennylane, while it is 32.3 times faster in training and 31 times faster in inference compared to Torchquantum.
IEEE AccessCOMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6673
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest.
IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on:
Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals.
Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering.
Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques.
Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.