探索学生在键合和共振方面的误解:普通化学实验室的计算化学练习

IF 2.5 3区 教育学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Alyssa V. B. Santos*, Alexander J. Rupprecht, Katsu Ogawa, Patrick W. Schneider, Adam M. Brown, Henri C. Santos and Scott Simpson*, 
{"title":"探索学生在键合和共振方面的误解:普通化学实验室的计算化学练习","authors":"Alyssa V. B. Santos*,&nbsp;Alexander J. Rupprecht,&nbsp;Katsu Ogawa,&nbsp;Patrick W. Schneider,&nbsp;Adam M. Brown,&nbsp;Henri C. Santos and Scott Simpson*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >An <i>in-silico</i> exercise was developed for a general chemistry laboratory course at St. Bonaventure University in which students examined potential energy surfaces, molecular orbital diagrams, and how bond orders and Lewis structures are connected. Pre- and post-assessment data suggests that, though students learned from the exercise, they are not connecting the concepts of bond order, Lewis structures, and resonance. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment scores before and after the laboratory experiment, and there was no statistical difference between the post-assessment and the follow-up assessment, which occurred after students completed the lab report 1 week after the initial experiment. The data suggest an improved understanding of computational chemistry concepts as well as improvement in the individual concepts of resonance, Lewis structures, and bond orders. However, an assessment question connecting these concepts did not show an improvement. An additional questionnaire was conducted to explore this discrepancy. This study indicates that more investigation is necessary with regard to students’ ability to make logical connections among bond orders, Lewis structures, and resonance.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 10","pages":"4381–4389 4381–4389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Student Misconceptions in Bonding and Resonance: A Computational Chemistry Exercise for General Chemistry Laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Alyssa V. B. Santos*,&nbsp;Alexander J. Rupprecht,&nbsp;Katsu Ogawa,&nbsp;Patrick W. Schneider,&nbsp;Adam M. Brown,&nbsp;Henri C. Santos and Scott Simpson*,&nbsp;\",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c0069410.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >An <i>in-silico</i> exercise was developed for a general chemistry laboratory course at St. Bonaventure University in which students examined potential energy surfaces, molecular orbital diagrams, and how bond orders and Lewis structures are connected. Pre- and post-assessment data suggests that, though students learned from the exercise, they are not connecting the concepts of bond order, Lewis structures, and resonance. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment scores before and after the laboratory experiment, and there was no statistical difference between the post-assessment and the follow-up assessment, which occurred after students completed the lab report 1 week after the initial experiment. The data suggest an improved understanding of computational chemistry concepts as well as improvement in the individual concepts of resonance, Lewis structures, and bond orders. However, an assessment question connecting these concepts did not show an improvement. An additional questionnaire was conducted to explore this discrepancy. This study indicates that more investigation is necessary with regard to students’ ability to make logical connections among bond orders, Lewis structures, and resonance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"101 10\",\"pages\":\"4381–4389 4381–4389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.4c00694","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

圣博纳文图大学为普通化学实验课程开发了一个实验室内练习,让学生研究势能面、分子轨道图以及键序和路易斯结构之间的联系。前后评估数据表明,虽然学生从练习中学到了知识,但他们并没有将键序、路易斯结构和共振的概念联系起来。实验前后的评估分数在统计学上有显著提高,而实验后评估和后续评估(学生在初始实验一周后完成实验报告)在统计学上没有差异。数据表明,学生对计算化学概念的理解有所提高,对共振、路易斯结构和键序等单个概念的理解也有所提高。然而,将这些概念联系起来的评估问题并没有显示出改进。为探究这一差异,我们又进行了一次问卷调查。这项研究表明,有必要对学生在键序、路易斯结构和共振之间建立逻辑联系的能力进行更多的调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Student Misconceptions in Bonding and Resonance: A Computational Chemistry Exercise for General Chemistry Laboratory

Exploring Student Misconceptions in Bonding and Resonance: A Computational Chemistry Exercise for General Chemistry Laboratory

An in-silico exercise was developed for a general chemistry laboratory course at St. Bonaventure University in which students examined potential energy surfaces, molecular orbital diagrams, and how bond orders and Lewis structures are connected. Pre- and post-assessment data suggests that, though students learned from the exercise, they are not connecting the concepts of bond order, Lewis structures, and resonance. There was a statistically significant improvement in the assessment scores before and after the laboratory experiment, and there was no statistical difference between the post-assessment and the follow-up assessment, which occurred after students completed the lab report 1 week after the initial experiment. The data suggest an improved understanding of computational chemistry concepts as well as improvement in the individual concepts of resonance, Lewis structures, and bond orders. However, an assessment question connecting these concepts did not show an improvement. An additional questionnaire was conducted to explore this discrepancy. This study indicates that more investigation is necessary with regard to students’ ability to make logical connections among bond orders, Lewis structures, and resonance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Chemical Education
Journal of Chemical Education 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
50.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信