脓毒性休克患者使用 oXiris 连续血液滤过吸附的临床疗效:回顾性分析

Yuxin Yang, Qionglan Dong, Jianpeng Su, Hongjun Xiao, Dan Zan, Jinfeng Chen, Xue Chen, Fan Wei, Cheng Zeng, Yanyan Yong
{"title":"脓毒性休克患者使用 oXiris 连续血液滤过吸附的临床疗效:回顾性分析","authors":"Yuxin Yang, Qionglan Dong, Jianpeng Su, Hongjun Xiao, Dan Zan, Jinfeng Chen, Xue Chen, Fan Wei, Cheng Zeng, Yanyan Yong","doi":"10.1016/j.medine.2024.09.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption on patients with septic shock and their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The oXiris group underwent hemofiltration adsorption using oXiris hemofilters and septic shock standard treatment, while the control group received septic shock standard treatment.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>The changes in inflammatory indicators and short-term mortality rate were evaluated. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted based on the 1:2 ratio between the oXiris and control groups to account for any baseline data differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment, PCT, IL-6, and hs-CRP levels in the oXiris group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in norepinephrine equivalents and organ function status (APACHE II score, SOFA score, Lac) between the two groups at the same time points. The 72-h mortality rate (21.88% vs. 34.04%) and the 7-day mortality rate (28.12% vs. 44.68%) were lower in the oXiris group compared to the control group, but not statistically significant. The 28-day mortality rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups (53.19% vs. 56.25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>oXiris continuous hemofiltration adsorption technology may reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in patients with septic shock; however, it does not appear to enhance organ function or improve the 28-day mortality rate in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94139,"journal":{"name":"Medicina intensiva","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical efficacy of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption in septic shock patients: A retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuxin Yang, Qionglan Dong, Jianpeng Su, Hongjun Xiao, Dan Zan, Jinfeng Chen, Xue Chen, Fan Wei, Cheng Zeng, Yanyan Yong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medine.2024.09.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption on patients with septic shock and their prognosis.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Septic shock patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The oXiris group underwent hemofiltration adsorption using oXiris hemofilters and septic shock standard treatment, while the control group received septic shock standard treatment.</p><p><strong>Main variables of interest: </strong>The changes in inflammatory indicators and short-term mortality rate were evaluated. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted based on the 1:2 ratio between the oXiris and control groups to account for any baseline data differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment, PCT, IL-6, and hs-CRP levels in the oXiris group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in norepinephrine equivalents and organ function status (APACHE II score, SOFA score, Lac) between the two groups at the same time points. The 72-h mortality rate (21.88% vs. 34.04%) and the 7-day mortality rate (28.12% vs. 44.68%) were lower in the oXiris group compared to the control group, but not statistically significant. The 28-day mortality rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups (53.19% vs. 56.25%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>oXiris continuous hemofiltration adsorption technology may reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in patients with septic shock; however, it does not appear to enhance organ function or improve the 28-day mortality rate in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2024.09.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medine.2024.09.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估奥希瑞斯-连续性血液滤过吸附对脓毒性休克患者的临床影响及其预后:参与者:脓毒性休克患者脓毒性休克患者:oXiris组使用oXiris血液过滤器进行血液过滤吸附,并接受脓毒性休克标准治疗,对照组接受脓毒性休克标准治疗:主要研究变量:评估炎症指标和短期死亡率的变化。根据 oXiris 组和对照组 1:2 的比例进行倾向得分匹配(PSM),以考虑任何基线数据差异:结果显示,治疗 24 小时、48 小时和 72 小时后,oXiris 组的 PCT、IL-6 和 hs-CRP 水平显著低于对照组(P 结论:oXiris 连续血液过滤吸附技术可降低脓毒性休克患者的炎症因子水平,但似乎并不能增强这些患者的器官功能或改善其 28 天死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical efficacy of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption in septic shock patients: A retrospective analysis.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the clinical impact of oXiris-continuous hemofiltration adsorption on patients with septic shock and their prognosis.

Design: A retrospective study.

Participants: Septic shock patients.

Interventions: The oXiris group underwent hemofiltration adsorption using oXiris hemofilters and septic shock standard treatment, while the control group received septic shock standard treatment.

Main variables of interest: The changes in inflammatory indicators and short-term mortality rate were evaluated. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted based on the 1:2 ratio between the oXiris and control groups to account for any baseline data differences.

Results: Results showed that after 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h of treatment, PCT, IL-6, and hs-CRP levels in the oXiris group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in norepinephrine equivalents and organ function status (APACHE II score, SOFA score, Lac) between the two groups at the same time points. The 72-h mortality rate (21.88% vs. 34.04%) and the 7-day mortality rate (28.12% vs. 44.68%) were lower in the oXiris group compared to the control group, but not statistically significant. The 28-day mortality rate did not show a significant difference between the two groups (53.19% vs. 56.25%).

Conclusions: oXiris continuous hemofiltration adsorption technology may reduce the levels of inflammatory factors in patients with septic shock; however, it does not appear to enhance organ function or improve the 28-day mortality rate in these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信