改变对话:旨在优化跨专业促进模拟团队培训的指导方针的影响。

IF 2.8 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mindy Ju, Naike Bochatay, Alexander Werne, Jenna Essakow, Lisa Tsang, Mary Nottingham, Deborah Franzon, Audrey Lyndon, Sandrijn van Schaik
{"title":"改变对话:旨在优化跨专业促进模拟团队培训的指导方针的影响。","authors":"Mindy Ju, Naike Bochatay, Alexander Werne, Jenna Essakow, Lisa Tsang, Mary Nottingham, Deborah Franzon, Audrey Lyndon, Sandrijn van Schaik","doi":"10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional simulation-based team training (ISBTT) is commonly used to optimize interprofessional teamwork in healthcare. The literature documents the benefits of ISBTT, yet effective interprofessional collaboration continues to be challenged by complex hierarchies and power dynamics. Explicitly addressing these issues during ISBTT may help participants acquire skills to navigate such challenges, but guidelines on how to do this are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied an educational design research approach to develop and pilot structured facilitator guidelines that explicitly address power and hierarchy with interprofessional teams. We conducted this work in a previously established ISBTT program at our institution, between September 2020 and December 2021. We first reviewed the literature to identify relevant educational theories and developed design principles. We subsequently designed, revised, and tested guidelines. We used qualitative thematic and content analysis of facilitator interviews and video-recording of IBSTT sessions to evaluate the effects of the guidelines on the pre- and debriefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative content analysis showed that structured guidelines shifted debriefing participation and content. Debriefings changed from physician-led discussions with a strong focus on medical content to conversations with more equal participation by nurses and physicians and more emphasis on teamwork and communication. The thematic analysis further showed how the conversation during debriefing changed and how interprofessional learning improved after the implementation of the guidelines. While power and hierarchy were more frequently discussed, for many facilitators these topics remained challenging to address.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully created and implemented guidelines for ISBTT facilitators to explicitly address hierarchy and power. Future work will explore how this approach to ISBTT impacts interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72108,"journal":{"name":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","volume":"9 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training.\",\"authors\":\"Mindy Ju, Naike Bochatay, Alexander Werne, Jenna Essakow, Lisa Tsang, Mary Nottingham, Deborah Franzon, Audrey Lyndon, Sandrijn van Schaik\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interprofessional simulation-based team training (ISBTT) is commonly used to optimize interprofessional teamwork in healthcare. The literature documents the benefits of ISBTT, yet effective interprofessional collaboration continues to be challenged by complex hierarchies and power dynamics. Explicitly addressing these issues during ISBTT may help participants acquire skills to navigate such challenges, but guidelines on how to do this are limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We applied an educational design research approach to develop and pilot structured facilitator guidelines that explicitly address power and hierarchy with interprofessional teams. We conducted this work in a previously established ISBTT program at our institution, between September 2020 and December 2021. We first reviewed the literature to identify relevant educational theories and developed design principles. We subsequently designed, revised, and tested guidelines. We used qualitative thematic and content analysis of facilitator interviews and video-recording of IBSTT sessions to evaluate the effects of the guidelines on the pre- and debriefs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitative content analysis showed that structured guidelines shifted debriefing participation and content. Debriefings changed from physician-led discussions with a strong focus on medical content to conversations with more equal participation by nurses and physicians and more emphasis on teamwork and communication. The thematic analysis further showed how the conversation during debriefing changed and how interprofessional learning improved after the implementation of the guidelines. While power and hierarchy were more frequently discussed, for many facilitators these topics remained challenging to address.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We successfully created and implemented guidelines for ISBTT facilitators to explicitly address hierarchy and power. Future work will explore how this approach to ISBTT impacts interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"43\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in simulation (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in simulation (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-024-00313-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:跨专业模拟团队培训(ISBTT)通常用于优化医疗保健领域的跨专业团队合作。文献记载了 ISBTT 的益处,但有效的跨专业合作仍然受到复杂的等级制度和权力动态的挑战。在 ISBTT 过程中明确解决这些问题可能有助于参与者掌握应对这些挑战的技能,但如何做到这一点的指导原则却很有限:我们采用教育设计研究方法,制定并试行了结构化的主持人指南,明确解决跨专业团队的权力和等级问题。2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 12 月期间,我们在本机构先前设立的 ISBTT 项目中开展了这项工作。我们首先查阅了相关文献,确定了相关的教育理论,并制定了设计原则。随后,我们设计、修订并测试了指南。我们对主持人访谈和 IBSTT 课程视频录像进行了定性主题分析和内容分析,以评估指南对课前和课后汇报的影响:定性内容分析显示,结构化指南改变了汇报的参与方式和内容。汇报从以医生为主导、重点关注医疗内容的讨论转变为护士和医生更平等参与、更强调团队合作和沟通的对话。专题分析进一步显示了汇报期间的对话是如何发生变化的,以及在实施指南后跨专业学习是如何得到改善的。虽然权力和等级制度被更频繁地讨论,但对许多主持人来说,这些话题仍然具有挑战性:我们成功地为 ISBTT 促进者制定并实施了明确解决等级和权力问题的指南。未来的工作将探索这种 ISBTT 方法如何影响临床实践中的跨专业合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing the conversation: impact of guidelines designed to optimize interprofessional facilitation of simulation-based team training.

Background: Interprofessional simulation-based team training (ISBTT) is commonly used to optimize interprofessional teamwork in healthcare. The literature documents the benefits of ISBTT, yet effective interprofessional collaboration continues to be challenged by complex hierarchies and power dynamics. Explicitly addressing these issues during ISBTT may help participants acquire skills to navigate such challenges, but guidelines on how to do this are limited.

Methods: We applied an educational design research approach to develop and pilot structured facilitator guidelines that explicitly address power and hierarchy with interprofessional teams. We conducted this work in a previously established ISBTT program at our institution, between September 2020 and December 2021. We first reviewed the literature to identify relevant educational theories and developed design principles. We subsequently designed, revised, and tested guidelines. We used qualitative thematic and content analysis of facilitator interviews and video-recording of IBSTT sessions to evaluate the effects of the guidelines on the pre- and debriefs.

Results: Qualitative content analysis showed that structured guidelines shifted debriefing participation and content. Debriefings changed from physician-led discussions with a strong focus on medical content to conversations with more equal participation by nurses and physicians and more emphasis on teamwork and communication. The thematic analysis further showed how the conversation during debriefing changed and how interprofessional learning improved after the implementation of the guidelines. While power and hierarchy were more frequently discussed, for many facilitators these topics remained challenging to address.

Conclusion: We successfully created and implemented guidelines for ISBTT facilitators to explicitly address hierarchy and power. Future work will explore how this approach to ISBTT impacts interprofessional collaboration in clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信