脾切除术对胃癌胃切除术后长期疗效的影响--基于人群的研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-10 DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009
Anna Junttila, Olli Helminen, Mika Helmiö, Heikki Huhta, Aapo Jalkanen, Raija Kallio, Vesa Koivukangas, Arto Kokkola, Simo Laine, Elina Lietzen, Johanna Louhimo, Sanna Meriläinen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Tuomo Rantanen, Ari Ristimäki, Jari V Räsänen, Juha Saarnio, Eero Sihvo, Vesa Toikkanen, Tuula Tyrväinen, Antti Valtola, Joonas H Kauppila
{"title":"脾切除术对胃癌胃切除术后长期疗效的影响--基于人群的研究","authors":"Anna Junttila, Olli Helminen, Mika Helmiö, Heikki Huhta, Aapo Jalkanen, Raija Kallio, Vesa Koivukangas, Arto Kokkola, Simo Laine, Elina Lietzen, Johanna Louhimo, Sanna Meriläinen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Tuomo Rantanen, Ari Ristimäki, Jari V Räsänen, Juha Saarnio, Eero Sihvo, Vesa Toikkanen, Tuula Tyrväinen, Antti Valtola, Joonas H Kauppila","doi":"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2090-2096"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Junttila, Olli Helminen, Mika Helmiö, Heikki Huhta, Aapo Jalkanen, Raija Kallio, Vesa Koivukangas, Arto Kokkola, Simo Laine, Elina Lietzen, Johanna Louhimo, Sanna Meriläinen, Vesa-Matti Pohjanen, Tuomo Rantanen, Ari Ristimäki, Jari V Räsänen, Juha Saarnio, Eero Sihvo, Vesa Toikkanen, Tuula Tyrväinen, Antti Valtola, Joonas H Kauppila\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2090-2096\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2024.10.009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:目前尚无国内研究比较全胃或部分胃切除术后因损伤、肿瘤或保留脾脏而行脾切除术的长期生存率。本研究的目的是在全国范围内研究因损伤或肿瘤原因或保留脾脏而接受全胃或部分胃切除术并行脾脏切除术的胃腺癌患者的总体 5 年生存率:该研究纳入了2005-2016年芬兰所有因胃腺癌接受全胃或部分胃切除术并行脾脏切除或保留脾脏的患者,随访至2019年12月31日。登记处共确认了2196名确诊胃癌并接受全胃或部分胃切除术的患者。其中,2118 名患者适用于本研究。Cox比例危险模型提供了总体5年生存率的危险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。结果根据年龄、性别、手术年份、合并症、肿瘤位置、病理分期和新辅助治疗进行了调整:结果:无脾损伤或轻微脾损伤患者的观察总5年生存率为38.7%,因损伤而切除脾脏的患者为39.7%,因肿瘤原因切除脾脏的患者为30.8%(P=0.032)。与保留脾脏的患者相比,因肿瘤原因行R0胃切除术并切除脾脏的患者5年死亡率更高(调整模型HR为1.26,95% CI为1.01-1.56):结论:因肿瘤原因切除脾脏的胃切除术患者的总生存率最差,这凸显了晚期胃癌患者的预后较差。因损伤而切除脾脏不会影响预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of splenectomy on long-term outcomes after gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a population-based study.

Background: No national studies comparing long-term survival after total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation exist. This study aimed to examine the 5-year overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy due to injury or oncologic reasons or spleen preservation in a population-based nationwide setting.

Methods: This study included all patients undergoing total or partial gastrectomy with splenectomy or spleen preservation for gastric adenocarcinoma in Finland from 2005 to 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2019. A total of 2196 patients with gastric cancer diagnosis and total or partial gastrectomy were identified in the registries. Of these patients, 2118 were applicable for this study. Cox proportional hazard models provided hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of 5-year OS. The results were adjusted for age, sex, year of operation, comorbidities, tumor location, pathologic stage, and neoadjuvant therapy.

Results: The observed 5-year OS rates were 38.7% in patients with no or minor spleen injury, 39.7% in patients with splenectomy due to injury, and 30.8% in patients with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons (P = .032). Patients who underwent R0 gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons had higher 5-year mortality (the adjusted model HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.01-1.56) than patients who underwent spleen preservation.

Conclusion: The OS was worst in patients who underwent gastrectomy with splenectomy due to oncologic reasons, highlighting the poor prognosis in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Splenectomy due to injury does not compromise the prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that updates the surgeon on the latest developments in gastrointestinal surgery. The journal includes original articles on surgery of the digestive tract; gastrointestinal images; "How I Do It" articles, subject reviews, book reports, editorial columns, the SSAT Presidential Address, articles by a guest orator, symposia, letters, results of conferences and more. This is the official publication of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract. The journal functions as an outstanding forum for continuing education in surgery and diseases of the gastrointestinal tract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信