在儿科环境中,两种不同的 PCA 泵在低流速时因极点位置而导致输液不准确的可能性--一项实验研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Judith E Riemer, Nathalie C Greber, Melanie Frühauf, Markus Weiss, Tobias Piegeler
{"title":"在儿科环境中,两种不同的 PCA 泵在低流速时因极点位置而导致输液不准确的可能性--一项实验研究。","authors":"Judith E Riemer, Nathalie C Greber, Melanie Frühauf, Markus Weiss, Tobias Piegeler","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01233-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertical displacement of infusion pumps used in patient-controlled analgesia can cause irregularities in drug delivery and is especially crucial at low flow rates, which are commonly used in pediatrics. There is only scarce data available regarding the extent of these inaccuracies. The current in vitro study therefore aimed at a comparison of the performance of two commonly used PCA pumps at different pole positions due to vertical displacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Syramed<sup>®</sup> µSP6000 Chroma syringe infusion pump featuring a stepper motor drive was compared to the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump utilizing a linear peristaltic pump system at two different flow rates (0.3 ml/h and 1 ml/h) and three different levels of height (0, + 50 and - 50 cm). Flow patterns and delivered volumes were measured after every change in position and infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Syramed<sup>®</sup> pump was more susceptible to vertical displacement than the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump and showed overall greater inaccuracies in the delivered volumes as well as higher infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time at both flow rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed differences between the pumps might be explained by the higher compliance of this syringe pump and the diverse working mechanisms. Overall, the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump might be considered a preferable option for patient-controlled analgesia in children. It is nonetheless essential for medical staff to be aware of the effects of vertical displacement of PCA pumps and to minimize these displacements as much as possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Susceptibility of two different PCA pumps to inaccurate delivery associated with pole position at low flow-rates in a pediatric setting - an experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Judith E Riemer, Nathalie C Greber, Melanie Frühauf, Markus Weiss, Tobias Piegeler\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01233-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Vertical displacement of infusion pumps used in patient-controlled analgesia can cause irregularities in drug delivery and is especially crucial at low flow rates, which are commonly used in pediatrics. There is only scarce data available regarding the extent of these inaccuracies. The current in vitro study therefore aimed at a comparison of the performance of two commonly used PCA pumps at different pole positions due to vertical displacement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Syramed<sup>®</sup> µSP6000 Chroma syringe infusion pump featuring a stepper motor drive was compared to the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump utilizing a linear peristaltic pump system at two different flow rates (0.3 ml/h and 1 ml/h) and three different levels of height (0, + 50 and - 50 cm). Flow patterns and delivered volumes were measured after every change in position and infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Syramed<sup>®</sup> pump was more susceptible to vertical displacement than the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump and showed overall greater inaccuracies in the delivered volumes as well as higher infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time at both flow rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The observed differences between the pumps might be explained by the higher compliance of this syringe pump and the diverse working mechanisms. Overall, the CADD<sup>®</sup>-Solis pump might be considered a preferable option for patient-controlled analgesia in children. It is nonetheless essential for medical staff to be aware of the effects of vertical displacement of PCA pumps and to minimize these displacements as much as possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01233-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01233-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:用于患者自控镇痛的输液泵的垂直位移会导致给药不正常,尤其是在儿科常用的低流速情况下。关于这些误差的程度,目前只有很少的数据。因此,目前的体外研究旨在比较两种常用 PCA 泵在不同极点位置因垂直位移而产生的性能:方法:在两种不同流速(0.3 毫升/小时和 1 毫升/小时)和三种不同高度(0、+ 50 和 - 50 厘米)下,将采用步进电机驱动的 Syramed® µSP6000 Chroma 注射器输液泵与采用线性蠕动泵系统的 CADD®-Solis 泵进行比较。每次改变位置后都测量流量模式和输送量,并计算输液量、逆行吸入量和零给药时间:结果:Syramed®泵比CADD®-Solis泵更容易受到垂直位移的影响,在两种流速下,输送量的误差更大,输液量、逆行吸入量和零给药时间也更长:结论:观察到的泵之间的差异可能是由于这种注射泵的顺应性更高以及工作机制不同。总之,CADD®-Solis 泵可被视为儿童患者自控镇痛的理想选择。不过,医务人员必须意识到 PCA 泵垂直位移的影响,并尽可能将这些位移降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Susceptibility of two different PCA pumps to inaccurate delivery associated with pole position at low flow-rates in a pediatric setting - an experimental study.

Purpose: Vertical displacement of infusion pumps used in patient-controlled analgesia can cause irregularities in drug delivery and is especially crucial at low flow rates, which are commonly used in pediatrics. There is only scarce data available regarding the extent of these inaccuracies. The current in vitro study therefore aimed at a comparison of the performance of two commonly used PCA pumps at different pole positions due to vertical displacement.

Methods: The Syramed® µSP6000 Chroma syringe infusion pump featuring a stepper motor drive was compared to the CADD®-Solis pump utilizing a linear peristaltic pump system at two different flow rates (0.3 ml/h and 1 ml/h) and three different levels of height (0, + 50 and - 50 cm). Flow patterns and delivered volumes were measured after every change in position and infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time were calculated.

Results: The Syramed® pump was more susceptible to vertical displacement than the CADD®-Solis pump and showed overall greater inaccuracies in the delivered volumes as well as higher infusion boluses, retrograde aspiration volumes and zero-drug delivery time at both flow rates.

Conclusion: The observed differences between the pumps might be explained by the higher compliance of this syringe pump and the diverse working mechanisms. Overall, the CADD®-Solis pump might be considered a preferable option for patient-controlled analgesia in children. It is nonetheless essential for medical staff to be aware of the effects of vertical displacement of PCA pumps and to minimize these displacements as much as possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信