Yiming Li , Qiang Wei , Xinghan Chen , Jianfu Li , Cui Tao , Hua Xu
{"title":"利用深度学习模型改进扫描实验室报告中的表格数据提取。","authors":"Yiming Li , Qiang Wei , Xinghan Chen , Jianfu Li , Cui Tao , Hua Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Medical laboratory testing is essential in healthcare, providing crucial data for diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, patients’ lab testing results are often transferred via fax across healthcare organizations and are not immediately available for timely clinical decision making. Thus, it is important to develop new technologies to accurately extract lab testing information from scanned laboratory reports. This study aims to develop an advanced deep learning-based Optical Character Recognition (OCR) method to identify tables containing lab testing results in scanned laboratory reports.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Extracting tabular data from scanned lab reports involves two stages: table detection (i.e., identifying the area of a table object) and table recognition (i.e., identifying and extracting tabular structures and contents). DETR R18 algorithm as well as YOLOv8s were involved for table detection, and we compared the performance of PaddleOCR and the encoder-dual-decoder (EDD) model for table recognition. 650 tables from 632 randomly selected laboratory test reports were annotated and used to train and evaluate those models. For table detection evaluation, we used metrics such as Average Precision (AP), Average Recall (AR), AP50, and AP75. For table recognition evaluation, we employed Tree-Edit Distance (TEDS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For table detection, fine-tuned DETR R18 demonstrated superior performance (AP50: 0.774; AP75: 0.644; AP: 0.601; AR: 0.766). In terms of table recognition, fine-tuned EDD outperformed other models with a TEDS score of 0.815. The proposed OCR pipeline (fine-tuned DETR R18 and fine-tuned EDD), demonstrated impressive results, achieving a TEDS score of 0.699 and a TEDS structure score of 0.764.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study presents a dedicated OCR pipeline for scanned clinical documents, utilizing state-of-the-art deep learning models for region-of-interest detection and table recognition. The high TEDS scores demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which has significant implications for clinical data analysis and decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 104735"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving tabular data extraction in scanned laboratory reports using deep learning models\",\"authors\":\"Yiming Li , Qiang Wei , Xinghan Chen , Jianfu Li , Cui Tao , Hua Xu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Medical laboratory testing is essential in healthcare, providing crucial data for diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, patients’ lab testing results are often transferred via fax across healthcare organizations and are not immediately available for timely clinical decision making. Thus, it is important to develop new technologies to accurately extract lab testing information from scanned laboratory reports. This study aims to develop an advanced deep learning-based Optical Character Recognition (OCR) method to identify tables containing lab testing results in scanned laboratory reports.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Extracting tabular data from scanned lab reports involves two stages: table detection (i.e., identifying the area of a table object) and table recognition (i.e., identifying and extracting tabular structures and contents). DETR R18 algorithm as well as YOLOv8s were involved for table detection, and we compared the performance of PaddleOCR and the encoder-dual-decoder (EDD) model for table recognition. 650 tables from 632 randomly selected laboratory test reports were annotated and used to train and evaluate those models. For table detection evaluation, we used metrics such as Average Precision (AP), Average Recall (AR), AP50, and AP75. For table recognition evaluation, we employed Tree-Edit Distance (TEDS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>For table detection, fine-tuned DETR R18 demonstrated superior performance (AP50: 0.774; AP75: 0.644; AP: 0.601; AR: 0.766). In terms of table recognition, fine-tuned EDD outperformed other models with a TEDS score of 0.815. The proposed OCR pipeline (fine-tuned DETR R18 and fine-tuned EDD), demonstrated impressive results, achieving a TEDS score of 0.699 and a TEDS structure score of 0.764.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our study presents a dedicated OCR pipeline for scanned clinical documents, utilizing state-of-the-art deep learning models for region-of-interest detection and table recognition. The high TEDS scores demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which has significant implications for clinical data analysis and decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15263,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"volume\":\"159 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104735\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biomedical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001539\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424001539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Improving tabular data extraction in scanned laboratory reports using deep learning models
Objective
Medical laboratory testing is essential in healthcare, providing crucial data for diagnosis and treatment. Nevertheless, patients’ lab testing results are often transferred via fax across healthcare organizations and are not immediately available for timely clinical decision making. Thus, it is important to develop new technologies to accurately extract lab testing information from scanned laboratory reports. This study aims to develop an advanced deep learning-based Optical Character Recognition (OCR) method to identify tables containing lab testing results in scanned laboratory reports.
Methods
Extracting tabular data from scanned lab reports involves two stages: table detection (i.e., identifying the area of a table object) and table recognition (i.e., identifying and extracting tabular structures and contents). DETR R18 algorithm as well as YOLOv8s were involved for table detection, and we compared the performance of PaddleOCR and the encoder-dual-decoder (EDD) model for table recognition. 650 tables from 632 randomly selected laboratory test reports were annotated and used to train and evaluate those models. For table detection evaluation, we used metrics such as Average Precision (AP), Average Recall (AR), AP50, and AP75. For table recognition evaluation, we employed Tree-Edit Distance (TEDS).
Results
For table detection, fine-tuned DETR R18 demonstrated superior performance (AP50: 0.774; AP75: 0.644; AP: 0.601; AR: 0.766). In terms of table recognition, fine-tuned EDD outperformed other models with a TEDS score of 0.815. The proposed OCR pipeline (fine-tuned DETR R18 and fine-tuned EDD), demonstrated impressive results, achieving a TEDS score of 0.699 and a TEDS structure score of 0.764.
Conclusions
Our study presents a dedicated OCR pipeline for scanned clinical documents, utilizing state-of-the-art deep learning models for region-of-interest detection and table recognition. The high TEDS scores demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach, which has significant implications for clinical data analysis and decision-making.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.