对于因躁动而无法配合 NIV 的患者,使用氯胺酮能否防止插管?

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Çağatay Nuhoğlu, Görkem Alper Solakoğlu, Ferhat Arslan, Ömer Faruk Gülsoy, Kamil Oğuzhan Döker
{"title":"对于因躁动而无法配合 NIV 的患者,使用氯胺酮能否防止插管?","authors":"Çağatay Nuhoğlu, Görkem Alper Solakoğlu, Ferhat Arslan, Ömer Faruk Gülsoy, Kamil Oğuzhan Döker","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01100-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory failure, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is applied when conventional oxygen support is not sufficient. Patients who are agitated often have very low NIMV compliance and a transition to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is often required. To avoid IMV, a suitable sedative agent can be utilized. The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between ketamine administration to patients who are non-compliant with NIMV due to agitation and the outcome of their intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the ED from 2021 to 2022 and used Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) to identify agitation level of patients. The relationship between ketamine administration in this patient group and NIMV compliance and intubation rate was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients, including 35 (43.2%) men and 46 (56.8%) women, were included in the study. Of these patients, 46 (56.8%) were intubated despite ketamine administration, while 35 (43.2%) were compliant with NIMV and were not intubated. When evaluating the RASS, which shows the agitation levels of the patients, the non-intubated group was found to be 2.17 ± 0.68, while the intubated group was 2.66 ± 0.73, and it was statistically significant that the NIMV intubated group was higher (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that agitation can impair NIMV compliance in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, a significant proportion of this patient group can be avoided through IMV with proper sedative agents.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"187"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can ketamine administration prevent intubation in patients who cannot comply with NIV due to agitation?\",\"authors\":\"Çağatay Nuhoğlu, Görkem Alper Solakoğlu, Ferhat Arslan, Ömer Faruk Gülsoy, Kamil Oğuzhan Döker\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-024-01100-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory failure, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is applied when conventional oxygen support is not sufficient. Patients who are agitated often have very low NIMV compliance and a transition to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is often required. To avoid IMV, a suitable sedative agent can be utilized. The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between ketamine administration to patients who are non-compliant with NIMV due to agitation and the outcome of their intubation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the ED from 2021 to 2022 and used Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) to identify agitation level of patients. The relationship between ketamine administration in this patient group and NIMV compliance and intubation rate was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 81 patients, including 35 (43.2%) men and 46 (56.8%) women, were included in the study. Of these patients, 46 (56.8%) were intubated despite ketamine administration, while 35 (43.2%) were compliant with NIMV and were not intubated. When evaluating the RASS, which shows the agitation levels of the patients, the non-intubated group was found to be 2.17 ± 0.68, while the intubated group was 2.66 ± 0.73, and it was statistically significant that the NIMV intubated group was higher (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study showed that agitation can impair NIMV compliance in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, a significant proportion of this patient group can be avoided through IMV with proper sedative agents.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11470658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01100-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01100-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在急诊科(ED)就诊的急性呼吸衰竭患者中,当常规氧气支持不足时就会使用无创机械通气(NIMV)。躁动不安的患者通常对 NIMV 的依从性很低,因此往往需要过渡到有创机械通气(IMV)。为避免 IMV,可使用合适的镇静剂。本研究旨在探讨对因躁动而不遵从 NIMV 的患者使用氯胺酮与插管结果之间的关系:这项回顾性研究纳入了2021年至2022年期间急诊科收治的急性呼吸衰竭患者,并使用里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)来确定患者的躁动程度。评估了该患者组氯胺酮用药与NIMV依从性和插管率之间的关系:共有 81 名患者参与了研究,其中男性 35 人(43.2%),女性 46 人(56.8%)。在这些患者中,有 46 人(56.8%)在使用氯胺酮后仍进行了插管,而有 35 人(43.2%)遵守了 NIMV 的规定,没有进行插管。在评估显示患者躁动程度的 RASS 时发现,未插管组的 RASS 为 2.17 ± 0.68,而插管组为 2.66 ± 0.73,且 NIMV 插管组的 RASS 更高有统计学意义(P = 0.003):本研究表明,躁动会影响急性呼吸衰竭患者对 NIMV 的依从性。结论:本研究表明,躁动会影响急性呼吸衰竭患者对 NIMV 的依从性,但通过使用适当的镇静剂进行 IMV,可以避免这一患者群体中的很大一部分人出现躁动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can ketamine administration prevent intubation in patients who cannot comply with NIV due to agitation?

Background: In patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute respiratory failure, non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) is applied when conventional oxygen support is not sufficient. Patients who are agitated often have very low NIMV compliance and a transition to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is often required. To avoid IMV, a suitable sedative agent can be utilized. The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between ketamine administration to patients who are non-compliant with NIMV due to agitation and the outcome of their intubation.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients with acute respiratory failure who were admitted to the ED from 2021 to 2022 and used Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) to identify agitation level of patients. The relationship between ketamine administration in this patient group and NIMV compliance and intubation rate was evaluated.

Results: A total of 81 patients, including 35 (43.2%) men and 46 (56.8%) women, were included in the study. Of these patients, 46 (56.8%) were intubated despite ketamine administration, while 35 (43.2%) were compliant with NIMV and were not intubated. When evaluating the RASS, which shows the agitation levels of the patients, the non-intubated group was found to be 2.17 ± 0.68, while the intubated group was 2.66 ± 0.73, and it was statistically significant that the NIMV intubated group was higher (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: This study showed that agitation can impair NIMV compliance in patients with acute respiratory failure. However, a significant proportion of this patient group can be avoided through IMV with proper sedative agents.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信