干预的特点和机制及其与社会处方影响的关系:系统回顾

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Eveline M. Dubbeldeman, Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong, Frank H. Ardesch, Mirte Boelens, Laura A. van der Velde, Sophie G. L. van der Steen, Miriam L. Heijnders, Mathilde R. Crone
{"title":"干预的特点和机制及其与社会处方影响的关系:系统回顾","authors":"Eveline M. Dubbeldeman,&nbsp;Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong,&nbsp;Frank H. Ardesch,&nbsp;Mirte Boelens,&nbsp;Laura A. van der Velde,&nbsp;Sophie G. L. van der Steen,&nbsp;Miriam L. Heijnders,&nbsp;Mathilde R. Crone","doi":"10.1155/2024/5597259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Social prescribing (SP) is an integrated care program aimed to improve individuals’ health and wellbeing. Understanding the influence of SP and determining best practices and processes are challenging due to variability in its delivery, implementation, and intervention characteristics between different studies and countries. This study aimed to identify the intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes associated with SP research and explore how these factors relate to the influence of SP on health and wellbeing, healthcare utilization, and care experiences. <i>Method</i>. A comprehensive search was conducted in twelve databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant studies published from January 2010 up to April 2023. Searches were limited to literature written in English or Dutch. We utilized ASReview, an open-source machine learning tool, to conduct title and abstract screening. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 and the ROBINS-I. We coded all intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and relevant outcomes. Quantitative data were visually presented using Harvest Plots, and qualitative data were narratively summarized. <i>Results and Discussion</i>. In total, 49 papers were included, of which seven qualitative, seventeen quantitative, and 25 mixed method studies. The findings highlight the importance of social-related mechanisms, including loneliness and social connectedness, in contributing to the observed positive influence of SP on mental health and wellbeing. The observed outcomes seem to be influenced by various characteristics, including gender, age, the presence of a link worker, and the use of behavior change techniques. However, we should be cautious when interpreting these results due to limitations in study designs, such as the lack of controlled trials and statistical considerations. Further rigorous research is needed to comprehensively understand the impact and potential benefits of SP.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5597259","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intervention Characteristics and Mechanisms and Their Relationship with the Influence of Social Prescribing: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Eveline M. Dubbeldeman,&nbsp;Jessica C. Kiefte-de Jong,&nbsp;Frank H. Ardesch,&nbsp;Mirte Boelens,&nbsp;Laura A. van der Velde,&nbsp;Sophie G. L. van der Steen,&nbsp;Miriam L. Heijnders,&nbsp;Mathilde R. Crone\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/5597259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Introduction</i>. Social prescribing (SP) is an integrated care program aimed to improve individuals’ health and wellbeing. Understanding the influence of SP and determining best practices and processes are challenging due to variability in its delivery, implementation, and intervention characteristics between different studies and countries. This study aimed to identify the intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes associated with SP research and explore how these factors relate to the influence of SP on health and wellbeing, healthcare utilization, and care experiences. <i>Method</i>. A comprehensive search was conducted in twelve databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant studies published from January 2010 up to April 2023. Searches were limited to literature written in English or Dutch. We utilized ASReview, an open-source machine learning tool, to conduct title and abstract screening. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 and the ROBINS-I. We coded all intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and relevant outcomes. Quantitative data were visually presented using Harvest Plots, and qualitative data were narratively summarized. <i>Results and Discussion</i>. In total, 49 papers were included, of which seven qualitative, seventeen quantitative, and 25 mixed method studies. The findings highlight the importance of social-related mechanisms, including loneliness and social connectedness, in contributing to the observed positive influence of SP on mental health and wellbeing. The observed outcomes seem to be influenced by various characteristics, including gender, age, the presence of a link worker, and the use of behavior change techniques. However, we should be cautious when interpreting these results due to limitations in study designs, such as the lack of controlled trials and statistical considerations. Further rigorous research is needed to comprehensively understand the impact and potential benefits of SP.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/5597259\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health & Social Care in the Community\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5597259\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/5597259","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介社会处方(Social Prescribing,SP)是一项旨在改善个人健康和福祉的综合护理计划。由于不同的研究和国家在社会处方的提供、实施和干预特点方面存在差异,因此了解社会处方的影响并确定最佳实践和流程具有挑战性。本研究旨在确定与 SP 研究相关的干预特点、机制和结果,并探讨这些因素与 SP 对健康和福祉、医疗保健利用率和护理体验的影响之间的关系。研究方法在十二个数据库、谷歌学术和参考文献列表中对 2010 年 1 月至 2023 年 4 月发表的相关研究进行了全面检索。搜索仅限于用英语或荷兰语撰写的文献。我们利用开源机器学习工具 ASReview 进行了标题和摘要筛选。我们使用混合方法评估工具(Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool)评估了纳入研究的方法学质量,并使用 Cochrane RoB2 和 ROBINS-I 评估了偏倚风险。我们对所有干预特点、机制和相关结果进行了编码。定量数据采用收获图直观呈现,定性数据采用叙述性总结。结果与讨论。共收录了 49 篇论文,其中 7 篇为定性研究,17 篇为定量研究,25 篇为混合方法研究。研究结果凸显了社会相关机制的重要性,包括孤独感和社会联系,这有助于观察到 SP 对心理健康和幸福的积极影响。观察到的结果似乎受到各种特征的影响,包括性别、年龄、是否有联系工作者以及行为改变技术的使用。然而,由于研究设计的局限性,如缺乏对照试验和统计方面的考虑,我们在解释这些结果时应该谨慎。要全面了解 SP 的影响和潜在益处,还需要进一步开展严格的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intervention Characteristics and Mechanisms and Their Relationship with the Influence of Social Prescribing: A Systematic Review

Intervention Characteristics and Mechanisms and Their Relationship with the Influence of Social Prescribing: A Systematic Review

Introduction. Social prescribing (SP) is an integrated care program aimed to improve individuals’ health and wellbeing. Understanding the influence of SP and determining best practices and processes are challenging due to variability in its delivery, implementation, and intervention characteristics between different studies and countries. This study aimed to identify the intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and outcomes associated with SP research and explore how these factors relate to the influence of SP on health and wellbeing, healthcare utilization, and care experiences. Method. A comprehensive search was conducted in twelve databases, Google Scholar, and reference lists of relevant studies published from January 2010 up to April 2023. Searches were limited to literature written in English or Dutch. We utilized ASReview, an open-source machine learning tool, to conduct title and abstract screening. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane RoB2 and the ROBINS-I. We coded all intervention characteristics, mechanisms, and relevant outcomes. Quantitative data were visually presented using Harvest Plots, and qualitative data were narratively summarized. Results and Discussion. In total, 49 papers were included, of which seven qualitative, seventeen quantitative, and 25 mixed method studies. The findings highlight the importance of social-related mechanisms, including loneliness and social connectedness, in contributing to the observed positive influence of SP on mental health and wellbeing. The observed outcomes seem to be influenced by various characteristics, including gender, age, the presence of a link worker, and the use of behavior change techniques. However, we should be cautious when interpreting these results due to limitations in study designs, such as the lack of controlled trials and statistical considerations. Further rigorous research is needed to comprehensively understand the impact and potential benefits of SP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信